medigraphic.com
ISSN 2594-1518 (Digital)
ISSN 1405-0099 (Impreso)

2011, Número S2

<< Anterior Siguiente >>

Cir Gen 2011; 33 (S2)


Toma de decisiones y dilemas éticos en cirugía

Rodríguez OG

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 17
Paginas: 173-177
Archivo PDF: 80.15 Kb.


FRAGMENTO

Introducción
La ética médica incorpora principios, virtudes y valores inherentes a la ciencia médica; su complejidad ha incrementado exponencialmente en la última mitad del siglo pasado debido a los nuevos desarrollos científicos, médicos y tecnológicos que pueden sobrepasar la comprensión de cómo y cuándo utilizarlos.


REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

  1. Mahoney JT. The relevance of Chester I Barnard’ teachings to contemporary management education: communicating the aesthetics of management. Theory and Behav 2002; 5: 159-172.

  2. Starbuck W. A brief history of decision making. (Abstract-Internet) http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/unssc/unpan022443.pdf

  3. Neuman VJ, Mongenstern O. Theory of games and economic behavior Princeton, Princeton, U. P. 1944.

  4. Simon HA. Theories of decision-making in economics and behavioral science. The American economic review 1959; XLIX: 253-283.

  5. Reyna VF. How people make decisions that involve risk. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2004; 13: 60-66.

  6. Sanderson C, Gruen R. Models and decision making in health care. En: Sanderson C, Gruen R. Analytical Models for Decision Making; New York; Open University Press McGraw-Hill Education; 2006: 7-43.

  7. Stacey L, Sheridan MD, Russell P. Harris MD, Steven H. Woolf MD. Shared decision making about screening and chemoprevention. A suggested approach from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2004; 26: 56-66.

  8. Orth-Gomér K. The significance of interaction in behavioral medicine. Homeostasis 1984; 35: 6-15.

  9. Rodríguez Ortega G. Desarrollo de la Medicina Conductual en México. Revista Latinoamericana de Medicina Conductual 2010; 1: 5-12.

  10. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavior change. Psychological Review 1977; 84: 191–215.

  11. Dickinson I. Guide to the Assessment of Competence and Performance in Practising Surgeons. ANZ J Surg 2009, 79: 198–204.

  12. Youngson GG, Flin R. Patient safety in surgery: non-technical aspects of safe surgical performance. Patient safety in surgery 2010, 4: 1-3 (Abstract-Internet) http://www.pssjournal.com/content/4/1/4.

  13. Torres F. El problema ético de la cirugía innecesaria. Seminario “El ejercicio actual de la medicina”. Facultad de Medicina. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México 2002; (Abstract-Internet) http://www.facmed.unam.mx/eventos/seam2k1/2004/ponencia_oct_2k4.htm.

  14. WHO: WHO Guidelines for Safe Surgery 2009. Safe Surgery Saves Lives; World Health Organization; 2009.

  15. Hundert EM. A model for ethical problem solving in medicine, with practical applications. FOCUS The journal of lifelong learning in psychiatry 2003; 1, 4: 427–435.

  16. Reitsma AM, Moreno JD. Ethical guidelines for innovative surgery. Hagerstown, Maryland; University Publishing Group; 2006; 212.

  17. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics; sixth edition; New York; Oxford University Press, Inc.; 2009; 417.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com