medigraphic.com
Colegio de Medicina Interna de México.

2009, Número 5

<< Anterior Siguiente >>

Med Int Mex 2009; 25 (5)


Pie diabético: reporte de un caso y criterios de amputación

Padierna LJL

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 45
Paginas: 404-411
Archivo PDF: 291.63 Kb.


RESUMEN

Se reporta un caso de pie diabético en un paciente de 48 años de edad, con antecedentes de diabetes mellitus tipo 2 desde hacía 13 años, con varios episodios de pie diabético y neuro osteoartropatía de Charcot, úlcera plantar crónica recurrente y necrobiosis. En tres ocasiones se le propuso amputación mayor (supracondílea), pero el paciente sólo aceptó amputaciones menores, con resultados clínicos aceptables.


REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

  1. Powers AC. Complicaciones crónicas de la diabetes mellitus. En: Kasper DL, et al. Harrison: Principios de Medicina Interna. México: McGraw-Hill, 2006;pp:2377-86.

  2. Martínez-Valdéz E, Frati-Munari AC. Pie diabético. En: Ramiro HM, Lifshitz GA, Halabe Cherem J, Frati Munari A. El Internista. 3ª ed. México: Nieto Editores, 2008;pp:132-34.

  3. Lipsky BA, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of diabetic foot infections. Clin Infect Dis 2004;39:885-910.

  4. Shank CF, Feibel JB. Osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot: diagnosis and management. Foot Ankle Clin 2006;11(4):775-789.

  5. Crawford F, Inkster M, Kleijnen J, Fahey T. Predicting foot ulcer in patients with diabetes: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Q J Med 2007;100:65-86.

  6. Khan NA, Rahim SA, Anand SS, et al. Does the clinical examination predict lower extremity peripheral arterial disease? JAMA 2006;295(5):536-46.

  7. Vinyoles E, Pujol E, Casermeiro J, et al. Ankle-brachial index to detect peripheral arterial disease: concordance and validation study between Doppler and an oscillometric device. Med Clin (Barc) 2007;128(3): 92-94.

  8. Premalatha G, Ravikumar R, Sanjay R, et al. Comparison of colour duplex ultrasound and ankle-brachial pressure index measurements in peripheral vascular disease in type 2 diabetic patients with foot infections. J Assoc Physicians India 2002;50:1240-44.

  9. Migliacci R, Nasorri R, Ricciarini P, Gresele P. Ankle-brachial index measured by palpation for the diagnosis of peripheral arterial disease. Fam Pract 2008;25(4):228-32.

  10. Benchimol A, Bernard B, Pillois X, et al. Validation of a new method of detecting peripheral artery disease by determination of ankle-brachial index using an automatic blood pressure device. Angiology 2004;55(2):127-34.

  11. Takahashi O, et al. Validation of auscultatory method for diagnosing peripheral arterial disease. Family Practice 2006;23(1):10-14.

  12. Nicolai SP, et al. Pocket Doppler and vascular laboratory equipment yield comparable results for ankle brachial index measurement. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders 2008;8:26-30.

  13. Collins R, et al. Duplex ultrasonography, magnetic resonance angiography, and computed tomography angiography for diagnosis and assessment of symptomatic, lower limb peripheral arterial disease: a systematic review. BMJ 2007;334:1257-66.

  14. Favaretto E, et al. Analysis of agreement between Dupplex ultrasound scanning and arteriography in patients with lower limb artery disease. J Cardiovasc Med 2007;8(5):337-41.

  15. Rossi P, Tauzin L, Boussuges A, Frances Y. Conventional ultrasonography Doppler in the assessment of arterial peripheral circulation. Rev Med Interne 2004;25(2):135-40.

  16. Lavery LA, Armostrong DG, Wunderlich RP, et al. Diabetic foot syndrome. Diabetes Care 2003;26:1435-38.

  17. Rajbhandari SM, Jenkins RC, Davies C, Tesfaye S. Charcot neuroarthropathy in diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia 2002;45:1085-96.

  18. Petrova NL, Edmonds ME. Charcot neuro-osteoarthropathycurrent standards. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2008;24 (Supp1): S58-61.

  19. Boulton AJ. The diabetic foot: from art to science. The 18th Camilo Golgi lecture. Diabetologia 2004;47(8):1343-53.

  20. Badlissi F, et al. Foot musculoeskeletal disorders, pain, and foot-related functional limitation in olders persons. JAm Geriatr Soc 2005;53(6):1029-33.

  21. Arana-Conejo V, Méndez-F JD. Fisiopatología de las complicaciones vasculares del pie diabético. Gac Méd Méx 2003;139(3):255-64.

  22. García-Rodríguez JA (Coordinador). Documento de consenso sobre el tratamiento antimicrobiano de las infecciones en el pie diabético. Rev Esp Quimioterap 2007;20(1):77-92.

  23. International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot. International consensus on the diabetic foot (CD-ROM). Brussels: International Diabetes Foundation, 2003.

  24. Peters EJ, Lavery LA. Effectivenss of the diabetic foot classification system of the International Working Group on the diabetic foot. Diabetes Care 2001;24:1442-47.

  25. Lavery LA, Peters EJ, et al. Reevaluating the way we classify the diabetic foot. Diabetes Care 2008;31:154-56.

  26. Armstrong DG, Frykberg RG. Classifying diabetic foot surgery: toward a rational definition. Diabet Med 2003;20(4):329-31.

  27. Dalla PL, Faglia E. Treatment of diabetic foot ulcer: an overview strategies for clinical approach. Curr Diabetes Rev 2006;2(4):431-37.

  28. Armstrong DG, Lavery LA, Frykberg RG,et al. Validation of a diabetic foot surgery classification. Int Wound J 2006;3(3):240- 46.

  29. Eckardt A, et al. Interdisciplinary treatment of diabetic foot syndrome. Orthopade 2003;32(3):190-98.

  30. Mendoza-Romo MA, Ramírez-Arriola MC. Abordaje multidisciplinario del pie diabético. Revista de Endocrinología y Nutrición 2005;13(4):165-79.

  31. Schofield CJ, et al. Mortality and hospitalization in patients after amputation. Diabetes Care 2006; 29:2252-56.

  32. Van Damme H, et al. Amputations in diabetic patients: a plea for footsparing surgery. Acta Chir Belg 2001;101(3):123- 29.

  33. Eskelinen E, Eskelinen A, Albäck A, Lepäntalo M. Mayor amputation incidence decreases both in non-diabetic and in diabetic patients in Helsinki. Scand Jorunal Surg 2006;95(3):185-89.

  34. Singhan Krishnan et al. Reduction in diabetic amputations over 11 years in a defined U.K. population. Diabetes Care 2008;31:99-101.

  35. Nigel Unwin. The diabetic foot in the depeloping world. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2008; 24 (Suppl 1):S31-S33.

  36. Jan Apelqvist. The foot in perspective. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2008;24 (Suppl 1) S110-S115.

  37. Boulton Andrew JM. The diabetic foot: grand overview, epidemiology and pathogenesis. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2008; 24 (Suppl 1): S3-S6.

  38. Fuente: egresos hospitalarios. Sistema de Información Médica Operativa (SIMO), 2007

  39. van Houtum William H. Amputations and ulceration; pitfalls in assessing incidence. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2008; 24: S14-S18.

  40. División Técnica de Información Estadística en Salud. El IMSS en cifras. Las intervenciones quirúrgicas. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc 2005; 43(6): 511-20.

  41. Fuente: Sistema de Información Médica Operativa (SIMO), 2008.

  42. Brem H. Sheehan P, Rosenberg H, Schneider JS, Boulton AJ. Evidence-based protocol for diabetic foot ulcers. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117 (Supp 7): 193S-209S.

  43. División Técnica de Información y Estadísticas en Salud. El IMSS en cifras: El censo de pacientes diabéticos 2004. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc 2006; 44(4): 375-82.

  44. Sabag-Ruiz E, Álvarez-Felix A, Celiz-Zepeda S, Gómez-Alcalá AV. Complicaciones crónicas de la diabetes mellitus. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc 2006; 44(5):415-21.

  45. Jeffcoate WJ, van Houtum WH. Amputation as a marker of the quality of foot care in diabetes. Diabetologia 2004; 47:2051-58.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com