Avendaño BRA, Vivian Patricia Cruz Minoli, Gabriel Rojas Poceros

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 25
Paginas: 215-221
Archivo PDF: 54.53 Kb.

RESUMEN

Objetivo: Revisión bibliográfica del desarrollo de los métodos anticonceptivos realizados por histeroscopia, su tasa de éxito y sus complicaciones. Conclusiones: La anticoncepción por histeroscopia es una alternativa viable para las mujeres en México. Solamente se necesita el entrenamiento y la difusión de estos sistemas para poder disminuir el costo del procedimiento y posibilitar su desarrollo y empleo en las instituciones de salud pública. Es un método de alta eficacia, mínima anestesia, sin incisiones quirúrgicas, fácil de aplicar, ambulatorio, con rápida recuperación, que permite la práctica de otros métodos quirúrgicos intrauterinos en el futuro de la paciente.

REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

1. Sociedad Española de Ginecología y Obstetricia. Tratado de Ginecología, Obstetricia y Medicina Reproductiva. España: Editorial Panamericana; Tomo II. 2004. p. 1490-1525.

2. Alvarado DA. Anticoncepción en México. Ginec Obstet Mex 2002; 70: 227.

3. Quiñones R, Alvarado A, Ley E. Hysteroscopic sterilization. Internat J Gynec Obstet 1976; 14 (1): 27-34.

4. Uribe RL, Ramírez AJ, Martínez OS, Esparza GJ. Esterilización femenina por laparoscopia. Ginec Obstet Mex 1975: 105-109.

5. Brueschke EE, Fadel HE. Mayerhofer K. Transcervical tubal occlusion with steerable hysteroscope: Implantation of devices into extirpated uteri. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1977; 127: 118-131.

6. Quiñones GR, Alvarado AD, Ley EC. Tubal electrocoagulation under hysteroscopic control (three hundred and fifty cases). Am J Obstet Gynecol 1975; 121 (8): 111-123.

7. Quiñones GR, Alvarado-Durán A, Ley CE, Sciarra JJ. Hysteroscopic sterilization, follow-up of 800 cases. In: Advances in female sterilization techniques. Gagestown, Maryland: Harper and Row; 1976. P. 162-168.

8. Zaneveld L. Transcervical tubal occlusion with a steerable hysteroscope: Implantation of devices into extirpated human uteri. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1977; 127 (2): 118-125.

9. Reed TP, Erb R. Hysteroscopic tubal occlusion with silicone rubber. Obstet Gynecol 1983; 61 (3): 388-392.

10. Cooper JM, Carignan ChS, Cher D, Kerin JF. Microinsert nonincisional hysteroscopic sterilization. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 102: 59-67.

11. Darabi KF, Richart RM. Collaborative study on hysteroscopic sterilization procedures. Preliminary Report. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 49: 48-54.

12. Sciarra JJ, Keith L. Hysteroscopic sterilization. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am 1995; 22: 581-589.

13. Ligt Veneman NGP, Tinga DJ, Kragt H, Brandsma G, Van Der Leij G. The efficacy of intratubal silicone in the Ovabloc hysteroscopic method of sterilization. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999; 78: 824-825.

14. Brundin J. Transcervical sterilization in the human female by hysteroscopic application of hidrogelic occlusive devices into the intramural parts of the Fallopian tubes: 10 years experience of the P block. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1991; 39: 41-49.

15. Hart R, Magos A. Development of a novel method of female sterilization: 1. The development of a novel method of hysteroscopic sterilization. J Laparoendosc Advan Sur Tech 2002; 12: 365-370.

16. Kerin JF, Carignan CS, Cher D. The safety and effectiveness of a new hysteroscopic method for permanent birth control: Results of the first Essure TM pbc clinical study. Aus NZJ Obstet Gynaecol 2001; 41: 364-370.

17. Houck RM, Cooper JM, Rigberg HS. Hysteroscopic tubal occlusion with formed in place silicone plugs: A clinical review. Obstet Gynecol 1983; 62 (5): 587-591.

18. Brundin J. Observations on the mode of action of an intratubal device, the P block. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 156 (4): 997-1000.

19. Valle RF. Future growth and, development of hysteroscopy. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am 1988; 15 (1): 111-126.

20. Brumsted JR, Shirk G, Soderling MJ, Reed T. Attempted transcervical occlusion of the fallopian tube with the nd:yag laser. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 77 (2): 327-328.

21. Bradley LD, Widrich T. State of the art flexible hysteroscopy for office gynecologic evaluation. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparoscop 1995; 2 (3): 263-267.

22. Peterson HB, Xia Z, Hughes JM et al. The risk of pregnancy after tubal sterilization: Findings from the U. S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 174 (4): 1161-1170.

23. Van der Leij G, Lammes FB. Office hysteroscopic tubal occlusion with siloxane intratubal devices (The Ovabloc method). Internat J Gynaecol Obstet 1996; 53 (3): 253 260.

24. Valle RF, Carignan CS, Wright TC. Tissue response to the STOP microcoil transcervical permanent contraceptive device: Results from a prehysterectomy study. Fertility and Sterility 76 (5): 974-979.

25. Jamieson DJ, Hillis SD. Complications of interval laparoscopic tubal sterilization: Findings from the United States Collaborative Review of Sterilization. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 96 (6): 997-1002.