Carrillo SC

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 26
Paginas: 201-204
Archivo PDF: 108.52 Kb.

RESUMEN

Se presenta una revisión de la literatura donde se comparan diferentes mecanismos de adhesión para la amalgama dental.

REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

1. Baum L, Lund M, Phillips R. Textbook of Operative Dentistry. W.B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia, 1981; 12: 276.

2. Phillips RW. Skinner’s Science of Dental Materials. 8th Edition. W.B. Saunders Co. St. Louis, 1983.

3. Anusavice K. Phillips’ Science of Dental Materials. 11th Edition Saunders Publishing Co. (Elsevier) St. Louis, 2003; 17: 495.

4. Summitt JB, Osborne JW. Amalgam Restorations. In: Summitt JB, Robbins JW, Schwartz RS. Fundamentals of Operative Dentistry. A contemporary approach. Second Edition. Quintessence Publishing Co., Inc. Chicago, IL. 2001:306.

5. Craig R. Dental materials. C.V. Mosby, Co. St. Louis, 1989; 9: 227.

6. Summitt J, Burgess J, Berry T. Three year evaluation of Amalgambond Plus and pin retained restorations. J Dent Res (Abstract 2716), 78: Special Issue, 445, 1999.

7. Setcos JC, Staninec M, Wilson NH. Clinical evaluation of bonded amalgam restorations over two years. J Dent Res (Abstract 2589) 77, (Special Issue B) 955, 1998.

8. Mach Z, Ruzickova T, Staninec M, Setcos J. Bonded amalgam restorations: Three year clinical results. J Dent Res (Abstract 3106) 77, (Special Issue B) 1020, 1998.

9. Belcher M, Stewart G. Two-year clinical evaluation of an amalgam adhesive. J Am Dent Assoc 1997; 128: 309-3 14.

10. Santos A, Meiers J. Fracture resistance of premolars with MOD amalgam restorations lined with Amalgambond. Oper Dent 1994; 19: 2-6.

11. Lo C, Milistein P, Nathanson D. In vitro shear strength of bonded amalgams cores with and without pins. J Prosth Dent 1995; 74: 385-391.

12. Staninec M, Marshall G, Lowe A, Ruzickova T. Clinical research on bonded amalgam restorations, Part 1: SEM study of in vivo bonded amalgam restorations. Gen Dent 1997; 45(4): 356-362.

13. Imbery T, Burgess J, Batzer R. Comparing the resistance of dentin bonding agents and pins in amalgam restorations. JADA 1995; 126: 753-758.

14. Imbery T, Hilton T, Reagan S. Retention of complex amalgam restorations using self-threading pins, amalgam pins and Amalgambond. Am J Dent 1995; 8: 117-121.

15. Boyer D, Roth L. Fracture resistance of teeth with bonded amalgams. Am J Dent 1994; 7: 91-94.

16. Bonilla E, White S. Fatigue of resin-bonded amalgam restorations. Oper Dent 1996; 21: 122-126.

17. Eakle W, Staninec M, Lacy A. Effect of bonded amalgam on the fracture resistance of teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 68: 257-260.

18. Oliveira J, Cochran M, Moore K. Influence of bonded amalgam restorations on the fracture strength of teeth. Oper Dent 1996; 21: 111-115.

19. Korale M, Meiers J. Microleakage of dentin bonding systems used with spherical and admixed amalgams. Am J Dent 1996; 9: 249-252.

20. Ruzickova T, Staninec M, Marshall G. SEM analysis of resin-amalgam adhesion after debonding. J Dent Res (Abstract 2289), 73: (Special Issue), 388 1994.

21. Tangsgoolwatana J, Cochran M, Moore K, Li Y. Microleakage evaluation of bonded amalgam restorations: confocal microscopy versus radioisotope. Quintessence Int 1997; 28: 467-477.

22. Pilo R, Brosh T, Chweidan H. Cusp reinforcement by bonding of amalgam restorations. J Dent Res 1998; 26: 467-472.

23. Burgess J, Alvarez A, Summitt J. Fracture resistance of complex amalgams. Oper Dent 1997; 22: 128- 132.

24. Berry F, Tjan A. Microleakage of amalgam restorations lined with dentin adhesives. Am J Dent 1994; 7: 333-336.

25. Chariton D, Moore K, Swartz M. In vitro evaluation of the use of resin liners to reduce microleakage and improve retention of amalgam restorations. Oper Dent 1992; 17: 112-119.

26. Dutton F, Summitt J, Chan D, Garcia-Godoy F. Effect of a resin lining and rebonding on the marginal leakage of amalgam restorations. J Dent 1993; 21: 52-56.