medigraphic.com
ISSN 2683-2348 (Digital)
Federación Latinoamericana de Simulación Clínica y Seguridad del Paciente

2024, Número 2

<< Anterior Siguiente >>

Simulación Clínica 2024; 6 (2)


Simulador de baixo curso para o ensino em saúde: análise do conceito

de Oliveira-Costa RR, Knobel R, de-Medeiros SM, Medeiros-Araújo MC, Morais-de Araújo W, de Souza-Reinaldo PV, Souto-de Araújo M

Idioma: Portugués
Referencias bibliográficas: 88
Paginas: 85-94
Archivo PDF: 457.79 Kb.


RESUMEN

Sin resumen.


REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

  1. Costa RRO, Medeiros SM, Martins JCA, Enders BC, Lira ALBC, Araújo MS. Simulação no ensino de enfermagem: uma análise conceitual. Rev Enferm Cent Oest Min. 2018; 8: e1928. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.19175/recom.v7i0.1928

  2. Salvador CAB, Toniosso JP, Nogueira LDP, Laredo SP. Simulação realística, estratégia metodológica para a formação de profissionais na área da saúde: Uma revisão integrativa. Rev Bra de Edu Saude. 2019; 9 (4): 58-54. doi: https://doi.org/10.18378/rebes.v9i4.6466.

  3. Shah A, Mai CL, Shah R, Levine AI. Simulation-based education and team training. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2019; 52 (6): 995-1003. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2019.08.002.

  4. Seropian MA, Brown K, Gavilanes JS, Driggers B. Simulation: not just a manikin. J Nurs Educ. 2004; 43 (4): 164-169. doi: https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20040401-04

  5. Souza FX, Rodrigues JC, Andrade JS, Oliveira CMO, Barbosa ALG, Brandão AS. Modelo simulador de baixo custo para treinamento de septoplastia. Rev Eletr Acervo Saud. 2020; (42). doi: https://doi.org/10.25248/reas.e2827.2020.

  6. Temperly KS, Yaegashi CH, Silva AML, Novak EM. Development and validation of a low-cost tracheostomy simulator. Sci Med. 2018; 28(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-6108.2018.1.28845.

  7. Meakim C, Boese T, Decker S, et al. Standards of best practice: simulation standard i: terminology. Clin Simul Nurs. 2013; 9 (6): 3-11. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2013.04.001.

  8. Morillo N, Bravo N, Prudencio C, Vassallo JC, Ponce M, Santos S, et al. Simulador de bajo costo para el entrenamiento en la colocación de accesos vasculares periféricos (AVP) en pediatría. Medic Infan. 2016; 23 (3): 213-216. Disponible en: http://www.medicinainfantil.org.ar/images/stories/volumen/2016/xxiii_3_213.pdf

  9. FLASIC. Simuladores de Bajo Costo Realizado en casa – design make share – diseñar construir compartir. [Acesso em: 1 fev. 2021] Disponível em: http://www.designmakeshare.org/share/flasic-simuladores-de-bajo-costo-realizado-en-casa/

  10. Walker LO, Avant KC. Concept analysis. In: Strategies for theory construction in nursing. 4th ed. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall; 2019. p. 149-160.

  11. Whittemore R, Knafl K. The integrative review: updated methodology. J Adv Nursing. 2005; 52 (5): 546-553. doi: http://dx.doi:.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x.

  12. Whittemore R. Combining evidence in nursing research: methods and implications. Nurs Res. 2005; 54 (1): 56-62. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006199-200501000-00008.

  13. Bardin L. Análise de conteúdo. Lisboa: Edições, 1977, 70.

  14. Silva JP, Pereira Junior GA, Meska MHG, Mazzo A. Construction and validation of a low-cost simulator for training patients with diabetes mellitus and/or their caregivers in insulin administration. Esc Anna Nery. 2018; 22 (3): e20170387. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-9465-EAN-2017-0387.

  15. Knobel R, Costa RRO. Confecção e uso de simuladores de baixo custo: experiências da medicina e enfermagem. In: Associação Brasileira de Educação Médica Simulação em saúde para ensino e avaliação: conceitos e práticas. São Carlos, SP: Cubo Multimídia; 2021.

  16. Teixeira CRS, Kusumota L, Braga FTMM, Gaioso VP, Santos CB, Silva VLS, Carvalho EC. O uso de simulador no ensino de avaliação clínica em enfermagem. Texto Contexto-Enferm. 2011; 20 (spe): 187-193. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-07072011000500024.

  17. Ellinas H, Denson K, Simpson D. Low-cost simulation: how-to guide. J Grad Med Educ. 2015; 7 (2): 257-258. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-15-00082.1.

  18. Hartwell DA, Grayling M, Kennedy RR. Low-cost high-fidelity anaesthetic simulation. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2014; 42 (3): 371-377. doi: https://doi:.org/10.1177/0310057X1404200315.

  19. Harbison RA, Dunlap J, Humphreys IM, Davis GE. Skills transfer to sinus surgery via a low-cost simulation-based curriculum. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2018; 8 (4): 537-546. doi: https://doi:.org/10.1002/alr.22069.

  20. Ritter KA, Leifer D, Orabi D, Prabhu A, French J, Lipman JM. How We Do It: Creation of a Low-Cost Endoscopic Skills Model for Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery Training. J Surg Educ. 2019; 76 (6): 1456-1459. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.06.005.

  21. Hossien A. Low-fidelity simulation of mitral valve surgery: simple and effective trainer. J Surg Educ. 2015; 72 (5): 904-909. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.04.010.

  22. King N, Kunac A, Johnsen E, Gallina G, Merchant AM. Design and validation of a cost-effective physical endoscopic simulator for fundamentals of endoscopic surgery training. Surg Endosc. 2016; 30 (11): 4871-4879. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4824-y.

  23. Byrne T, Yong SA, Steinfort DP. Development and assessment of a low-cost 3d-printed airway model for bronchoscopy simulation training. J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2016; 23 (3): 251-254. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/LBR.0000000000000257.

  24. Clark MP, Westerberg BD, Mitchell JE. Development and validation of a low-cost microsurgery Ear Trainer for low-resource settings. J Laryngol Otol. 2016; 130 (10): 954-961. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215116008811.

  25. Lerner DJ, Gifford SE, Olafsen N, Mileto A, Soloff E. Lumbar puncture: creation and resident acceptance of a low-cost, durable, reusable fluoroscopic phantom with a fluid-filled spinal canal for training at an academic program. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020; 41 (3): 548-550. doi: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6439.

  26. Chang DR, Lin RP, Bowe S, et al. Fabrication and validation of a low-cost, medium-fidelity silicone injection molded endoscopic sinus surgery simulation model. Laryngoscope. 2017; 127 (4): 781-786. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.26370.

  27. Williams TP, Snyder CL, Hancock KJ, et al. Development of a low-cost, high-fidelity skin model for suturing. J Surg Res. 2020; 256: 618-622. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2020.07.051.

  28. Kaneko N, Mashiko T, Ohnishi T, et al. Manufacture of patient-specific vascular replicas for endovascular simulation using fast, low-cost method. Sci Rep. 2016; 6. doi: https://doi:.org/10.1038/srep39168.

  29. Buscaglia JM, Fakhoury J, Loyal J, et al. Simulated colonoscopy training using a low-cost physical model improves responsiveness of surgery interns. Colorectal Dis. 2015; 17 (6): 530-535. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.12883.

  30. Pywell MJ, Evgeniou E, Highway K, Pitt E, Estela CM. High fidelity, low cost moulage as a valid simulation tool to improve burns education. Burns. 2016; 42 (4): 844-852. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2015.12.013.

  31. Reino-Pires P, Lopez M. Validation of a low-cost do-it-yourself model for neonatal thoracoscopic congenital diaphragmatic hernia repair. J Surg Educ. 2018; 75 (6): 1658-1663. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.04.005.

  32. Ng V, Plitt J, Biffar D. Development of a Novel Ultrasound-guided Peritonsillar Abscess Model for Simulation Training. West J Emerg Med. 2018; 19 (1): 172-176. doi: https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2017.11.36427.

  33. Cleary DR, Siler DA, Whitney N, Selden NR. A microcontroller-based simulation of dural venous sinus injury for neurosurgical training. J Neurosurg. 2018; 128 (5): 1553-1559. doi: https://doi:.org/10.3171/2016.12.JNS162165.

  34. Pedersen TH, Gysin J, Wegmann A, et al. A randomised, controlled trial evaluating a low cost, 3D-printed bronchoscopy simulator. Anaesthesia. 2017; 72 (8): 1005-1009. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.13951.

  35. York SL, Migas S, Haag J, et al. Creation and initial assessment of a second-trimester uterine model. Simul Healthc. 2014; 9 (3): 199-202. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000042.

  36. Augenstein JA, Yoshida H, Lo MD, Solari P. A Readily Available, Inexpensive, and Reusable Simulation Model for Teaching Ultrasound-Guided Abscess Identification and Drainage. J Emerg Med. 2016; 50 (3): 462-465. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.12.020

  37. Lopez G, Martin DF, Wright R, et al. Construct validity for a cost-effective arthroscopic surgery simulator for resident education. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2016; 24 (12): 886-894. doi: https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-16-00191.

  38. Bengiamin DI, Toomasian C, Smith DD, Young TP. Emergency department thoracotomy: a cost-effective model for simulation training. The Journ Emer Med. 2019; 57 (3): 375-379. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2019.06.022.

  39. Knobel R, Volpato LK, Gervasi LC, Viergutz RA, Trapani Júnior A. A simple, reproducible and low-cost simulator for teaching surgical techniques to repair obstetric anal sphincter injuries. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2018; 40 (8): 465-470. doi: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1668527.

  40. Silva AA, Lanzoni GMM, Sousa LP, Barra DCC, Lazzari DD, Nascimento KC. Development of a cardiopulmonary resuscitation prototype for health education. Rev Enferm UERJ. 2020; 28: 1-7. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12957/reuerj.2020.53033.

  41. Morillo N, Bravo N, Prudencio C, et al. Low-cost simulator for the training of peripheral venous access (PVA) placement in pediatrics. Med Infant. 2016; 23 (3): 213-216. Available in: https://www.medicinainfantil.org.ar/images/stories/volumen/2016/xxiii _3_213.pdf

  42. Samsudin K, Rafi A, Ali AZM, Rashid NA. Enhancing a low-cost virtual reality application through constructivist approach: the case of spatial training of middle graders. TOJET. 2014; 13 (3): 50-57.

  43. Reweti S, Gilbey A, Jeffrey L. Efficacy of low-cost pc-based aviation training devices. Journ Inform Techn Educat Res. 2017; 16: 127-142.

  44. Lee M, Ang C, Andreadis K, Shin J, Rameau A. An open-source three-dimensionally printed laryngeal model for injection laryngoplasty training. Laryngoscope. 2021; 131 (3): 890-895. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.28952.

  45. Alvarez-Lopez F, Maina MF, Arango F, Saigí-Rubió F. Use of a low-cost portable 3D virtual reality simulator for psychomotor skill training in minimally invasive surgery: task metrics and score validity. JMIR Serious Games. 2020; 8 (4): e19723. doi: https://doi.org/10.2196/19723.

  46. Agyeman KD, Summers SH, Massel DH, Mouhanna J, Aiyer A, Dodds SD. Innovation in orthopaedic surgery education: novel tools for modern times. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020; 28 (18): e782-e792. doi: https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00411.

  47. Chen WH, Radzi S, Chiu LQ, Yeong WY, Mogali SR. Development of a 3-dimensional printed tube thoracostomy task trainer: an improved methodology. Semantic Scholar; 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.29060/TAPS.2021-6-1/SC2243

  48. Evans LM, Owens D. Enhancement of a low-fidelity surgical simulator. Is it possible? J Laryngol Otol. 2021; 135 (2): 179-181. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215120002613.

  49. Alvarez-Lopez F, Maina MF, Saigí-Rubió F. Use of a low-cost portable 3D virtual reality gesture-mediated simulator for training and learning basic psychomotor skills in minimally invasive surgery: development and content validity study. J Med Internet Res. 2020; 22 (7): e17491. doi: https://doi.org/10.2196/17491.

  50. Ho M, Goldfarb J, Moayer R, et al. Design and printing of a low-cost 3D-printed nasal osteotomy training model: development and feasibility study. JMIR Med Educ. 2020; 6 (2): e19792. doi: https://doi.org/10.2196/19792.

  51. Johnson GGRJ, Jelic T, Derksen A, et al. A new inexpensive simulation model for ultrasound assessment of optic nerve sheath diameter. Can J Neurol Sci. 2020; 47 (4): 543-548. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2020.37.

  52. Oussi N, Enochsson L, Henningsohn L, Castegren M, Georgiou E, Kjellin A. Trainee performance after laparoscopic simulator training using a blackbox versus lapmentor. J Surg Res. 2020; 250: 1-11. doi: https://doi:.org/10.1016/j.jss.2019.12.039.

  53. Cantillon-Murphy P, Jaeger HA, Donovan M, et al. A novel simulated training platform and study of performance among different levels of learners in flexible cystoscopy. Simul Healthc. 2020; 15 (3): 214-220. doi: https://doi:.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000430.

  54. Nataraja RM, Oo YM, Kyaw KK, et al. Clinical impact of the introduction of pediatric intussusception air enema reduction technology in a low- to middle-income country using low-cost simulation-based medical education. Simul Healthc. 2020; 15 (1): 7-13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000397.

  55. Santos DR, Teixeira RKC, Pimentel ALJC, Corrêa WJP, Araújo NP, Calvo FC, Barros RSM. The ophthalmologist and the grapes: a microsurgical training model. Rev Bras Oftalmol. 2020; 79 (6): 366-369. doi: https://doi.org/10.5935/0034-7280.20200080.

  56. McClelland TJ, Ford K, Dagash H, Lander A, Lakhoo K. Low-fidelity paediatric surgical simulation: description of models in low-resource settings. World J Surg. 2019; 43 (5): 1193-1197. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-019-04921-3.

  57. Alvarez-Lopez F, Maina MF, Saigí-Rubió F. Use of commercial off-the-shelf devices for the detection of manual gestures in surgery: systematic literature review. J Med Internet Res. 2019; 21 (5): e11925. doi: https://doi.org/10.2196/11925.

  58. Parham G, Bing EG, Cuevas A, et al. Creating a low-cost virtual reality surgical simulation to increase surgical oncology capacity and capability. Ecancermedicalscience. 2019; 13: 910. doi: https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2019.910.

  59. Turkot O, Banks MC, Lee SW, et al. A review of anesthesia simulation in low-income countries. Curr Anesthesiol Rep. 2019; 9: 1-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40140-019-00305-4.

  60. Nourian MM, Kolbay P, Hoehne S, et al. Investigating capnography innovation for better patient monitoring in the resource limited surgical setting. Surg Innov. 2019; 26 (1): 124-128. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1553350618813252.

  61. Cid FF, Vargas J, Melillanca G, Schleyer PG, Sanhueza G. An inexpensive and novel phantom prototype for auscultation in simulation-based training for medical processes, 2018. IEEE International Conference on Automation/XXIII Congress of the Chilean Association of Automatic Control (ICA-ACCA); 2018. p. 1-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICA-ACCA.2018.8609759.

  62. Lima DS, Almeida YAS, Cid DMC, Cardoso LC, Braga CS, Regis FGS. Modelo sintético de baixo custo para treinamento do uso de torniquete. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2019; 46 (6). doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-6991e-20192324.

  63. Oskar P, Kemmling A, Rostalski P. Low-cost physiological simulation system for endovascular treatment of aneurysms. Cur Direct Biomed Engineer. 2018; 4 (1): 37-40.

  64. Mashari A, Montealegre-Gallegos M, Jeganathan J, et al. Low-cost three-dimensional printed phantom for neuraxial anesthesia training: Development and comparison to a comercial model. PLoS ONE. 2018; 13 (6): e0191664. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/cdbme-2018-0010.

  65. Rocha IRO, Oliveira MHB, Bengtson KL, et al. Modelo artesanal para treinamento de acesso vascular periférico. Jorn Vasc Bras. 2017; 16 (3): 195-198. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1677-5449.010216.

  66. Harbison RA, Johnson KE, Miller C, Sardesai MG, Davis GE. Face, content, and construct validation of a low-cost, non-biologic, sinus surgery task trainer and knowledge-based curriculum. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2017; 7 (4): 405-413. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.21883.

  67. Malekzadeh S, Pfisterer MJ, Wilson B, Na H, Steehler MK. A novel low-cost sinus surgery task trainer. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011; 145 (4): 530-533. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599811413373.

  68. Alfa-Wali M, Antoniou A. Eco-friendly laparoscopic home trainer. Simul Healthc. 2011; 6 (3): 176-179. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0b013e318208549b.

  69. Overby DW, Watson RA. Hand motion patterns of Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery certified and noncertified surgeons. Amer Jour Surg. 2014; 207 (2): 226-230. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.10.007.

  70. Cristián J, Inzunza M, Bellolio F, et al. Desarrollo y evaluación de modelo ex vivo para entrenamiento de anastomosis intracorpórea en hemicolectomía derecha laparoscópica. Rev Cir. 2020; 72 (3): 209-216. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.35687/s2452-45492020003554.

  71. Artifon ELA, Cheng S, Nakadomari T, et al. Ex vivos models to teaching therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound (T-EUS). Ex vivos models to teaching therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound (T-EUS). Rev Gastroenterol Peru. 2018; 38 (1): 103-110. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.47892/rgp.2018.381.877

  72. Prada-Mancilla WA, Gutiérrez-López A, Durán-Torres M, Valencia-Castrillón A, Bustos-Martínez Y. Comparison of effectiveness between a conventional catheter and a manual commercial catheter: randomized trial of simulation of intraosseous access in a biological model. Rev Colomb Anestesiol. 2019; 47 (2): 92-99. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/cj9.0000000000000101.

  73. Nunes CP, Kulcheski AL, Almeida PA, et al. Creation of a low-cost endoscopic flavectomy training model. Coluna. 2020; 19 (3): 223-227. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1808-185120201903227933.

  74. Javier C, Rodríguez G. Simulación en laparoscopía durante la formación del cirujano general. Revisión y experiencia inicial. Rev Méd Urug. 2018; 34 (4): 120-141. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.29193/rmu.34.4.7.

  75. Bedi MS, Bhavthankar TD, Girijala MR, et al. Lazy glass microsurgical trainer: a frugal solution for microsurgical training. World Neurosurg. 2019; 125: 433-442. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.141.

  76. Alsalemi A, Alhomsi Y, Bensaali F, Hssain AA. A high-realism and cost-effective training simulator for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. IEEE Access. 2021; 9: 20893-20901. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3052145.

  77. Riutort KT, Clifton W, Damon A, Dove C, Clendenen SR. Construction of an affordable lumbar neuraxial block model using 3D printed materials. Cureus. 2019; 11 (10) :e6033. doi: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.6033.

  78. Oberoi G, Eberspächer-Schweda MC, Hatamikia S, et al. 3D printed biomimetic rabbit airway simulation model for nasotracheal intubation training. Front Vet Sci. 2020; 7: 587524. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.587524.

  79. Xia P, Lopes M, Restivo MT. Virtual reality and haptics for dental surgery: a personal review. Vis Comput. 2013; 29: 433-447. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00371-012-0748-2.

  80. Rodríguez-Vila B, Gutiérrez A, Peral-Boiza M, et al. A low-cost pedagogical environment for training on technologies for image-guided robotic surgery. World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering; 2018, 821-824.

  81. Shahbazi B, Edalat-nejad M, Edalat-nejad N, Edalatnejad M. Introduction of clinical, simulation-based software for medical sciences teachings. Procedia Engin. 2012; 29: 43-47. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.12.665.

  82. Elias BL, Moss JA, Dillavou M, Shih A, Azuero A. Evaluation of nursing student perspectives of a simulated smart pump. Clin Simul Nurs. 2013; 9 (12): 599-606. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2013.04.018.

  83. Bhashyam AR, Logan C, Roberts HJ, Qudsi RA, Fils J, Dyer GSM. A randomized controlled pilot study of educational techniques in teaching basic arthroscopic skills in a low-income country. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2017; 5 (2): 82-88. Available in: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5410749/pdf/ABJS-5-82.pdf

  84. Knobel R, Menezes MO, Santos DS, Takemoto MLS. Planning, construction and use of handmade simulators to enhance the teaching and learning in obstetrics. Rev Latino-Am Enferm. 2020; 28: e3302. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.3684.3302.

  85. Giraldo-Gutiérrez DS, Arrendo-Verbel MA, Rincón-Valenzuela DA. Dantrolene reconstitution: description of a simulation model in malignant hyperthermia. Colomb Jour Anesth. 2018; 46 (2): 152-158. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/CJ9.0000000000000028.

  86. Rowse PG, Ruparel RK, Brahmbhatt RD, Dy BM, AlJamal YN, Abdelsattar J, Farley DR. Assimilating endocrine anatomy through simulation: a pre-emptive strike! Amer Jour Surg. 2015; 209 (3): 542-546. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.12.004

  87. Mücke U, Grigull L, Sanger B, et al. Introducing low-cost simulation equipment for simulation-based team training. Innovat Simul. 2020; 38: 18-22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2019.09.001.

  88. Costa RRO, Araújo MS, Medeiros SM, Mazzo A, Castro OP, Sanchez JMR. Development and content and face validation of low-cost simulators evaluation instrument. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2024; 91: 101539. doi: https://doi:.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2024.101539.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com