medigraphic.com
ISSN 1659-1046 (Impreso)
Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences

2023, Número 3

<< Anterior Siguiente >>

Odovtos-Int J Dent Sc 2023; 25 (3)


Resistencia de unión en microtracción de cementos resinosos a resinas para provisionales impresas y fresadas

Soto-Montero J, de Cassia RB, dos Santos NM, Bosso AC, Giannini M

Idioma: Ingles.
Referencias bibliográficas: 56
Paginas: 82-98
Archivo PDF: 686.32 Kb.


RESUMEN

Evaluar la resistencia adhesiva en microtracción (µTBS) de dos cementos resinosos a resinas CAD/CAM impresas y fresadas indicadas para restauraciones provisionales. Bloques (5 x 5 x 5mm) de tres resinas impresas (Cosmos3DTemp / Yller; Resilab3D Temp / Wilcos and SmartPrint BioTemp, / MMTech) y una resina fresada (VitaCAD-Temp, VITA) fueron fabricados. La mitad de los especímenes fueron arenados y el resto no recibió tratamiento mecánico. Dos bloques con condiciones de tratamiento iguales fueron cementados con cemento resinoso (PanaviaV5 / Kuraray Noritake y RelyX Ultimate / 3M Oral Care). Después de 24 horas los bloques fueron seccionados en palitos de 1 mm² de área. En la mitad de los especímenes se midió la TBS inmediatamente y el resto fue termociclado (5000 ciclos, 30s remojo, 5s transferencia) antes de la prueba de TBS. Se aplica un análisis estadístico por Modelo Linear General con 4 factores (material*arenado*cemento*termociclado). La resina VITA presentó la menor µTBS, independientemente del cemento usado, el arenado y el termociclado. Sin embargo, el arenado aumentó la µTBS de VIT, especialmente después del termociclado. Por otro lado, el arenado no resultó en un aumento significativo de la µTBS de las resinas impresas. El arenado no fue beneficiosos para las resinas impresas, aunque es un paso crucial para la cementación adhesive de las resinas fresadas. El arenado afecta la integridad de las capas de las resinas impresas, sin generar un beneficio en la TBS.


REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

  1. Gratton D.G., Aquilino S.A. Interim restorations. Dent Clin North Am. 2004; 48: 487-97.

  2. Miura S., Fujisawa M., Komine F., et al. Importance of interim restorations in the molar region. J Oral Sci. 2019; 61: 195-9.

  3. Tarnow D., Chu S., Salama M., et al. Flapless postextraction socket implant placement in the esthetic zone: part 1. the effect of bone grafting and/or provisional restoration on facial-palatal ridge dimensional change - a retrospective cohort study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2014; 34: 323-31.

  4. Winter A., Erdelt K., Giannakopoulos N., et al: Impact of different types of dental prostheses on oral health-related quality of life: a prospective bicenter study of definitive and interim restorations. Int J Prosthodont. 2021; 34: 441-7.

  5. Hahnel S., Scherl C., Rosentritt M. Interim rehabilitation of occlusal vertical dimension using a double-crown-retained removable dental prosthesis with polyetheretherketone framework. J Prosthet Dent. 2018; 119: 315-8.

  6. Peng M., Li C., Huang C., Liang S. Digital technologies to facilitate minimally invasive rehabilitation of a severely worn dentition: A dental technique. J Prosthet Dent. 2021; 126: 167-72.

  7. Skorulska A., Piszko P., Rybak Z., Szymonowicz M., Dobrzyński M. Review on Polymer, Ceramic and Composite Materials for CAD/CAM Indirect Restorations in Dentistry-Application, Mechanical Characteristics and Comparison. Materials (Basel) 2021; 14: 1592. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14071592

  8. Ruse N.D., Sadoun M.J. Resin-composite blocks for dental CAD/CAM applications. J Dent Res. 2014; 93: 1232-4.

  9. Mainjot A.K., Dupont N.M., Oudkerk J.C., et al: From artisanal to CAD-CAM blocks: state of the art of indirect composites. J Dent Res. 2016; 95: 487-95.

  10. Huettig F., Prutscher A., Goldammer C., et al: First clinical experiences with CAD/CAM-fabricated PMMA-based fixed dental prostheses as long-term temporaries. Clin Oral Investig. 2016; 20: 161-8.

  11. Çagri Ural, Burgaz Y., Saraç D. In vitro evaluation of marginal adaptation in five. Quintessence Int (Berl). 2010; 41: 585-90.

  12. Başaran E.G., Ayna E., Vallittu P.K., Lassila L.V.J. Load bearing capacity of fiber-reinforced and unreinforced composite resin CAD/CAM-fabricated fixed dental prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 2013; 109: 88-94.

  13. da Silva L.H., de Lima E., Miranda R.B. de P., et al. Dental ceramics: a review of new materials and processing methods. Braz Oral Res. 2017; 31: 133-46.

  14. Della Bona A., Cantelli V., Britto V.T., et al: 3D printing restorative materials using a stereolithographic technique: a systematic review. Dent Mater. 2021; 37: 336-50.

  15. Kessler A., Hickel R., Reymus M. 3D printing in dentistry-state of the art. Oper Dent. 2020; 45: 30-40.

  16. Alsandi Q., Ikeda M., Arisaka Y., et al. Evaluation of mechanical and physical properties of light and heat polymerized udma for dlp 3d printer. Sensors. 2021; 21: 1-10.

  17. Lin CH., Lin Y.M., Lai Y.L., Lee S.Y. Mechanical properties, accuracy, and cytotoxicity of UV-polymerized 3D printing resins composed of Bis-EMA, UDMA, and TEGDMA. J Prosthet Dent. 2020; 123: 349-54.

  18. Palin W.M., Leprince J.G., Hadis M.A. Shining a light on high volume photocurable materials. Dent Mater. 2018; 34: 695-710.

  19. Wilson N.H.F., Lynch C.D. The teaching of posterior resin composites: Planning for the future based on 25 years of research. J Dent. 2014; 42: 503-16.

  20. Tahayeri A., Morgan M.C., Fugolin A.P., et al. 3D printed versus conventionally cured provisional crown and bridge dental materials. Dent Mater. 2018; 34: 192-200.

  21. Osman R., Alharbi N., Wismeijer D. Build Angle: Does It Influence the Accuracy of 3D-Printed Dental Restorations Using Digital Light-Processing Technology? Int J Prosthodont. 2017; 30: 182-8.

  22. Revilla-León M., Jordan D., Methani M.M., Piedra-Cascón W., Özcan M., Zandinejad A. Influence of printing angulation on the surface roughness of additive manufactured clear silicone indices: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2021; 125: 462-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.02.008

  23. Reymus M., Stawarczyk B. In vitro study on the influence of postpolymerization and aging on the Martens parameters of 3D-printed occlusal devices. J Prosthet Dent. 2020; 125: 817-23.

  24. Soto-Montero J., de Castro E.F., Romano B.C., Nima G., Shimokawa C.A.K., Giannini M. Color alterations, flexural strength, and microhardness of 3D printed resins for fixed provisional restoration using different post-curing times. Dent Mater 2022; 38 (8): 1271-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2022.06.023

  25. Soto-Montero J., Nima G., Dias C.T.D.S., et al: Influence of beam homogenization on bond strength of adhesives to dentin. Dent Mater. 2021; 37: e47-58.

  26. Bedran-Russo A., Leme-Kraus A.A., Vidal C.M.P., Teixeira E.C. An Overview of Dental Adhesive Systems and the Dynamic Tooth-Adhesive Interface. Vol. 61, Dental Clinics of North America. 2017. p. 713-31.

  27. Sanares A.M.E., Itthagarun A., King N.M., et al: Adverse surface interactions between one-bottle light-cured adhesives and chemical-cured composites. Dent Mater. 2001; 17: 542-56.

  28. Reymus M., Fabritius R., Keßler A., et al: Fracture load of 3D-printed fixed dental prostheses compared with milled and conventionally fabricated ones: the impact of resin material, build direction, post-curing, and artificial aging-an in vitro study. Clin Oral Investig. 2020; 24: 701-10.

  29. Mayer J., Stawarczyk B., Vogt K., et al: Influence of cleaning methods after 3D printing on two-body wear and fracture load of resin-based temporary crown and bridge material. Clin Oral Investig. 2021; 25: 5987-5996.

  30. Revilla-León M., Meyers M.J., Zandinejad A., Özcan M. A review on chemical composition, mechanical properties, and manufacturing work flow of additively manufactured current polymers for interim dental restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019; 31: 51-7.

  31. Kim D., Shim J.S.J.S., Lee D., et al. Effects of post-curing time on the mechanical and color properties of three-dimensional printed crown and bridge materials. Polymers (Basel). 2020; 12: 1-20.

  32. Park S.M., Park J.M., Kim S.K., et al: Flexural strength of 3D-printing resin materials for provisional fixed dental prostheses. Materials (Basel). 2020; 13 (18): 1-14.

  33. Keßler A., Hickel R., Ilie N. In vitro investigation of the influence of printing direction on the flexural strength, flexural modulus and fractographic analysis of 3D-printed temporary materials. Dent Mater J. 2021; 40: 641-9

  34. Alharbi N., Osman R., Wismeijer D. Effects of build direction on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed complete coverage interim dental restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2016; 115: 760-7.

  35. Revilla-León M., Morillo J.A., Att W., Özcan M. Chemical composition, knoop hardness, surface roughness, and adhesion aspects of additively manufactured dental interim materials. J Prosthodont. 2020; 0: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13302

  36. Grzebieluch W., Kowalewski P., Grygier D., Rutkowska-Gorczyca M., Kozakiewicz M., Jurczyszyn K. Printable and Machinable Dental Restorative Composites for CAD/CAM Application-Comparison of Mechanical Properties, Fractographic, Texture and Fractal Dimension Analysis. Materials (Basel) 2021; 14: 4919. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14174919

  37. Simoneti D.M., Pereira-Cenci T., dos Santos M.B.F. Comparison of material properties and biofilm formation in interim single crowns obtained by 3D printingand conventional methods. J Prosthet Dent 2022; 127: 168-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.06.026

  38. Perea-Lowery L., Gibreel M., Vallittu P.K., Lassila L. Evaluation of the mechanical properties and degree of conversion of 3D printed splint material. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2021; 115: 104254.

  39. Mayer J., Reymus M., Mayinger F., Edelhoff D., Hickel R., Stawarczyk B. Temporary 3D-Printed Fixed Dental Prosthesis Materials: Impact of Postprinting Cleaning Methods on Degree of Conversion and Surface and Mechanical Properties. Int J Prosthodont 2021; 34: 784-95. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.7048

  40. Revilla-León M., Umorin M., Özcan M., Piedra-Cascón W. Color dimensions of additive manufactured interim restorative dental material. J Prosthet Dent. 2020; 123: 754-60.

  41. Choi J.W., Ahn J.J., Son K., Huh J.B. Three-dimensional evaluation on accuracy of conventional and milled gypsum models and 3D printed photopolymer models. Materials (Basel). 2019; 12: 1-10.

  42. Nestler N., Wesemann C., Spies B.C., et al: Dimensional accuracy of extrusion- and photopolymerization-based 3D printers: In vitro study comparing printed casts. J Prosthet Dent. 2021; 125: 103-10.

  43. Kim J., Lee D-H. Influence of the Postcuring Process on Dimensional Accuracy and Seating of 3D-Printed Polymeric Fixed Prostheses. Biomed Res Int 2020; 2020: 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2150182

  44. Lim N.-K., Shin S.-Y. Bonding of conventional provisional resin to 3D printed resin: the role of surface treatments and type of repair resins. J Adv Prosthodont. 2020; 12: 322.

  45. Jeong K.W., Kim S.H. Influence of surface treatments and repair materials on the shear bond strength of CAD/CAM provisional restorations. J Adv Prosthodont. 2019; 11: 95-104.

  46. Zalkind M., Hochman N. Laminate veneer provisional restorations: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 1997; 77: 109-10.

  47. Soares C.J., Giannini M., de Oliveira M.T., et al: Effects of surface treatments of laboratory-fabricated composites on the microtensile bond strength to a luting resin cement. J Appl Oral Sci. 2004; 12: 45-50.

  48. Spitznagel F.A., Horvath S.D., Guess P.C., Blatz M.B. Resin bond to indirect composite and new ceramic/polymer materials: A review of the literature. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2014; 26: 382-93.

  49. Makishi P., André C.B., Silva J.P.L.E., et al: Effect of storage time on bond strength performance of multimode adhesives to indirect resin composite and lithium disilicate glass ceramic. Oper Dent. 2016; 41: 541-51.

  50. Tokunaga E., Nagaoka N., Maruo Y., et al: Phosphate group adsorption capacity of inorganic elements affects bond strength between cad/cam composite block and luting agent. Dent Mater J. 2021; 40: 288-96.

  51. Nagasawa Y., Eda Y., Shigeta H., Ferrari M., Nakajima H., Hibino Y. Effect of sandblasting and/or priming treatment on the shear bond strength of self-adhesive resin cement to CAD/CAM blocks. Odontology 2022;110: 70-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-021-00635-y

  52. D’Arcangelo C., Vanini L. Effect of three surface treatments on the adhesive properties of indirect composite restorations. J Adhes Dent. 2007; 9: 319-26.

  53. de Araújo Neto V.G., Soto-Montero J., Castro E.F., Feitosa V.P., Rueggeberg F.A., Giannini M. Effects of shades of a multilayered zirconia on light transmission, monomer conversion, and bond strength of resin cement. J Esthet Restor Dent 2022; 34: 412-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12821

  54. Gale M.S., Darvell B.W. Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent. 1999; 27: 89-99.

  55. Armstrong S., Breschi L., Ozcan M., et al. Academy of Dental Materials guidance on in vitro testing of dental composite bonding effectiveness to dentin/enamel using micro-tensile bond strength (TBS) approach. Dent Mater. 2017; 33: 133-43.

  56. Poitevin A., De Munck J., Van Landuyt K., et al. Influence of three specimen fixation modes on the micro-tensile bond strength of adhesives to dentin. Dent Mater J. 2007; 26: 694-9.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com