medigraphic.com
Federación Mexicana de Ginecología y Obstetricia, A.C.

2023, Número 12

<< Anterior Siguiente >>

Ginecol Obstet Mex 2023; 91 (12)


Doppler de la arteria oftálmica: un modelo para predicción de preeclampsia

Sanabria VLC, Santiago SL, Malfavón FM, Herrera EJP, Jiménez CD, Zatarain BNC, Gaona TCJ

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 71
Paginas: 885-902
Archivo PDF: 264.76 Kb.


RESUMEN

Antecedentes: En México, la preeclampsia sigue siendo un problema de salud pública; en la actualidad es la principal causa de muerte materna. Su incidencia es de 47.3 casos por cada 1000 nacimientos. La preeclampsia trae consigo repercusiones en la madre y el feto; de ahí la necesidad de la validación de modelos de tamizaje efectivos que permitan su diagnóstico oportuno. La evaluación Doppler de la arteria oftálmica sigue siendo motivo de diversas investigaciones porque aporta información valiosa de los cambios hemodinámicos intracraneales que suceden, incluso, antes del curso sintomático de la enfermedad.
Objetivo: Analizar las recomendaciones emitidas por diferentes autores que han evaluado la utilización del Doppler de la arteria oftálmica como modelo de tamizaje para la predicción y diagnóstico tempranos de preeclampsia.
Metodología: Estudio retrospectivo basado en la búsqueda exhaustiva en diferentes bases de datos de metanálisis y estudios clínicos aleatorizados que describieran, detalladamente, la población estudiada y los parámetros de la arteria oftálmica evaluados.
Resultados: Se identificaron 22 publicaciones y en el cribado se excluyeron 8 artículos que estaban duplicados, 2 por no cumplir con los criterios de inclusión y 1 por encontrarse en otro idioma diferente al inglés; al final se revisaron 11 títulos y para complementar el tema de estudio se revisaron otros 60 artículos.
Conclusiones: La evaluación mediante Doppler de la arteria oftálmica es un examen simple, rápido, reproducible, seguro y no invasivo que puede incorporarse a la predicción y diagnóstico temprano de pacientes con alto riesgo de preeclampsia.


REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

  1. Chaemsaithong P, Sahota DS, Poon LC. First trimesterpreeclampsia screening and prediction. Am J ObstetGynecol 2022; 226 (2): S1071-S1097.e2. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2020.07.020

  2. Velumani V, Durán Cárdenas C, Hernández Gutiérrez LS.Preeclampsia: una mirada a una enfermedad mortal. Rev laFac Med Mex 2021; 64 (5): 7-18. https://doi.org/10.22201/fm.24484865e.2021.64.5.02

  3. Franco GM, De Oliveira Falco M, Do Amaral WN. Usingultrasound and Doppler ultrasound to assess vascularchanges in pre-eclampsia and eclampsia: A systematicreview. Reprod e Clim 2015; 30 (1): 33-41. doi:10.1016/j.recli.2015.04.002

  4. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.Gestacional Hypertension and Preeclampsia. ObstetGynecol 2020; 135 (6): e237-e260. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003891.

  5. Dai X, Kang L, Ge H. Doppler parameters of ophthalmicartery in women with preeclampsia: A meta-analysis. JClin Hypertens 2023; 25 (1): 5-12. doi:10.1111/jch.14611

  6. Gibbone E, Sapantzoglou I, Nuñez-Cerrato ME, WrightA, Nicolaides KH, Charakida M. Relationship betweenophthalmic artery Doppler and maternal cardiovascularfunction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2021; 57 (5): 733-38.doi:10.1002/uog.23601

  7. Lau K, Wright A, Sarno M, Kametas NA, Nicolaides KH.Comparison of ophthalmic artery Doppler with PlGF andsFlt-1/PlGF ratio at 35–37 weeks’ gestation in prediction ofimminent pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2022;59 (5): 606-612. doi:10.1002/uog.24874

  8. Zapata Marín MF, Giraldo Ramírez JE, Román Murillo LT,Pacheco Narváez E, Echavez Agudelo AR. Doppler de arteriaoftálmica como método electivo para predicción depreeclampsia. Arch Med 2022; 22 (2): 191-97. https://doi.org/10.30554/archmed.22.2.4536.2022

  9. Freytez J. Caracterización ultrasonográfica Doppler de lasarterias oftálmica y uterina en gestantes con factores deriesgo para preeclampsia. Boletín Médico Postgrado 2022;38 (1): 36-42. doi:10.5281/zenodo.6468844

  10. Gonser M, Vonzun L, Ochsenbein-Kölble N. Ophthalmicartery Doppler in prediction of pre-eclampsia: insights fromhemodynamic considerations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol2021; 58 (1): 145-47. doi:10.1002/uog.23665

  11. Oviedo Guarino JC, Uribe Portilla LK, Moreira W. EcoDoppler de la arteria oftálmica en pacientes con trastorno.Rev Obstet Ginecol Venez 2016; 76 (3): 188-95. https://ve.scielo.org/pdf/og/v76n3/art07.pdf

  12. Lara Flores LM. Doppler de arteria uterina y Doppler dela arteria oftálmica como predictores de preeclampsia.Rev Divers Científica 2022; 2 (2): 9-17. doi:10.36314/diversidad.v2i2.33

  13. Rolnik DL, Wright D, Poon LCY, et al. ASPRE trial: performanceof screening for preterm pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound ObstetGynecol 2017; 50 (4): 492-95. doi:10.1002/uog.18816

  14. Porter TF, Gyamfi-Bannerman C, Manuck T. ACOG COMMITTEEOPINION Number 743. Low-dose aspirin useduring pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2018; 132 (1): E44-E52.doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000002708

  15. Dimitriadis E, Rolnik DL, Zhou W, Estada-Gutiérrez G, KogaK, Francisco RPV, et al. Pre-eclampsia. Nat Rev Dis Prim2023; 9 (1): 1-22. doi:10.1038/s41572-023-00417-6

  16. Lagerweij GR, Brouwers L, De Wit GA, Moons KGM, BenschopL, Maas AHEM, et al. Impact of preventive screeningand lifestyle interventions in women with a history ofpreeclampsia: A micro-simulation study. Eur J Prev Cardiol2020; 27 (13): 1389-99. doi:10.1177/2047487319898021

  17. Phipps EA, Thadhani R, Benzing T, Karumanchi SA. Preeclampsia:pathogenesis, novel diagnostics and therapies.Nat Rev Nephrol 2019; 15 (5): 275-89. doi:10.1038/s41581-019-0119-6

  18. Ives CW, Sinkey R, Rajapreyar I, Tita ATN, Oparil S. Preeclampsia-Pathophysiology and Clinical Presentations: JACCState-of-the-Art Review. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020; 76 (14):1690-702. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2020.08.014

  19. Paauw ND, Lely AT. Cardiovascular sequels during andafter preeclampsia. Adv Exp Med Biol 2018; 1065: 455-70.doi:10.1007/978-3-319-77932-4_28

  20. Wang Y, Li B, Zhao Y. Inflammation in preeclampsia: Geneticbiomarkers, mechanisms, and therapeutic strategies. FrontImmunol 2022; 13: 1-14. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2022.883404

  21. Myatt L. The prediction of preeclampsia: the way forward.Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022; 226 (2): S1102-S1107.e8.doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2020.10.047

  22. Zakiyah N, Tuytten R, Baker PN, Kenny LC, Postma MJ, vanAsselt ADI. Early cost-effectiveness analysis of screening forpreeclampsia in nulliparous women: A modelling approachin european high-income settings. PLoS One 2022; 17: 1-20.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0267313

  23. Lorber Rolnik D, Burlacchini de Carvalho MH, Rago LoboGA. Preeclampsia: universal screening or universal preventionfor low and middle-income settings? Rev Bras GinecolObs 2021; 43 (4): 334-38. doi:10.1055/s-0041-1729953

  24. Poon LC, Shennan A, Hyett JA, Kapur A, Hadar E, DivakarH, et al. The International Federation of Gynecology andObstetrics (FIGO) initiative on pre-eclampsia: A pragmaticguide for first-trimester screening and prevention. Int JGynaecol Obstet 2019; 145 (Suppl 1): 1-33. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12802.

  25. Bibbins-Domingo K, Grossman DC, Curry SJ, et al. Screeningfor preeclampsia US preventive services task force recommendationstatement. JAMA 2017; 317 (16): 1661-67.doi:10.1001/jama.2017.3439

  26. Ma´ayeh M, Constantine MM. Prevention of preeclampsia.Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2020; 25 (5): 139-48.doi:10.1016/j.siny.2020.101123

  27. Loussert L, Vidal F, Parant O, Hamdi SM, Vayssiere C,Guerby P. Aspirin for prevention of preeclampsia and fetalgrowth restriction. Prenat Diagn 2020; 40 (5): 519-27.doi:10.1002/pd.5645

  28. Ibarra-Estrada M, Mijangos-Méndez JC, Aguirre-ÁvalosG, Ortiz-Larios F. Evaluación de la hemodinamia cerebralmediante ecografía Doppler transcraneal en pacientes conpreeclampsia/eclampsia. Med Crítica 2022; 36 (6): 363-70.doi:10.35366/107459

  29. Cipolla MJ. Cerebrovascular function in pregnancy andeclampsia. Hypertension 2007; 50 (1): 14-24. doi:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.106.079442

  30. Zunker P, Ley-Pozo J, Louwen F. Cerebral hemodynamicsin preeclampsia-eclampsia syndrome. UltrasoundObs Gynecol 1995; 6 (1): 411-15. doi:10.1046/j.1469-0705.1995.06060411.x

  31. Martínez-Martínez MM, Fernández-Travieso J, GómezMuñoz N, Varela Mezquita B, Almarcha-Menargues ML,Miralles Martínez A. Cerebral hemodynamics and vasoconstrictionin preeclampsia: From diagnosis to resolution.Pregnancy Hypertens 2021; 26: 42-47. doi:10.1016/j.preghy.2021.08.114

  32. Qureshi AI, Frankel MR, Ottenlips JR, Stern BJ. Cerebralhemodynamics in preeclampsia and eclampsia. ArchNeurol 1996; 53 (12): 1226-31. doi:10.1001/archneur.1996.00550120034013

  33. Demarin V, Rundek T, Hodek B. Maternal cerebralcirculation in normal and abnormal pregnancies.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1997; 76 (7): 619-24.doi:10.3109/00016349709024600

  34. Sidorova I, Nikitina N, Tardov M. Cerebral blood flow insevere pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. Obstet Gynecol 2020;12: 90-99. doi:10.18565/aig.2020.12.90-99

  35. Kaneda H, Irino T, Arita N, Minami T, Taneda M, ShiraishiJ. Relationship between ophthalmic artery blood flowand recanalization of occluded carotid artery. Ultrasonicdoppler study. Stroke 1978; 9 (4): 360-63. doi:10.1161/01.STR.9.4.360

  36. Sanguil P, Castillo A, Arellano P, Leon C, Mena G. SpectralDoppler Central Artery of the Retina and Ophthalmic arteryin patients with diabetic diagnosis retinopathy. Rev la FedEcuatoriana Radiol 2012; 5 (1): 32-35.

  37. de Fátima Ribeiro dos Anjos G, de Freitas MAR, dos SantosMCA, Diniz ALD. Doppler indices of the ophthalmic arteryin pregnant women with pregestational diabetes mellituswith and without retinopathy. J Ultrasound Med 2021; 40(2): 251-57. doi:10.1002/jum.15393

  38. Nicolaides KH, Sarno M, Wright A. Ophthalmic arteryDoppler in the prediction of preeclampsia. Am J ObstetGynecol 2022; 226 (2): S1098-S1101. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2020.11.039

  39. Wójtowicz A, Zembala-Szczerba M, Babczyk D, Kołodziejczyk-Pietruszka M, Lewaczyńska O, Huras H. Early-and late-onsetpreeclampsia: a comprehensive cohort study of laboratoryand clinical findings according to the new ISHHP criteria. IntJ Hypertens 2019. doi:10.1155/2019/4108271

  40. American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologist Hypertensionin Pregnancy. Am Coll Obstet Gynecol 2013; 30(3): 407-23. doi:10.1016/j.ccl.2012.04.005

  41. Tomimatsu T, Mimura K, Matsuzaki S, Endo M, KumasawaK, Kimura T. Preeclampsia: Maternal systemic vasculardisorder caused by generalized endothelial dysfunctiondue to placental antiangiogenic factors. Int J Mol Sci 2019;20 (17): 1-18. doi:10.3390/ijms20174246

  42. Diniz ALD, Paes MMBM, Diniz AD. Analyzing PE as the tip of theiceberg represented by women with long-term cardiovasculardisease, atherosclerosis, and inflammation. Curr AtherosclerRep 2020; 22 (3). doi:10.1007/s11883-020-0830-6

  43. Diniz ALD, Menêses VFS de C, Freitas MAR de, Paes MMBM,Naves WU, Sass N. Performance of ophthalmic arteryDoppler velocimetry in the complementary diagnosis ofPE. J Matern Neonatal Med 2022; 35 (25): 9078-85. doi:10.1080/14767058.2021.2014452

  44. Alves Borges JH, Goes DA, De Araújo LB, Dos Santos MC,Debs Diniz AL. Prospective study of the hemodynamic behaviorof ophthalmic arteries in postpartum preeclampticwomen: A doppler evaluation. Hypertens Pregnancy 2016;35 (1): 100-111. doi:10.3109/10641955.2015.1116553

  45. Hata T, Senoh D, Hata K, Kitao M. Ophthalmic artery velocimetryin pregnant women. Lancet 1992; 340: 182-83.doi:10.1016/0140-6736(92)93268-r

  46. de Melo PFMV, Roever L, Mendonça TMS, da Silva CostaF, Rolnik DL, Diniz ALD. Ophthalmic artery Doppler in thecomplementary diagnosis of preeclampsia: a systematicreview and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2023;23 (1): 1-11. doi:10.1186/s12884-023-05656-9

  47. Cazarez-Ávalos IA, García-Benavente D, Toledo-Lorenzo CN,Valle-Leal JG, López-Valenzuela DM. Desempeño diagnósticodel modelo FullPIERS como predictor de complicacionesperinatales en pacientes con preeclampsia. Ginecol ObstetMex 2020; 88 (1): 1-7. doi:10.24245/gom.v88i1.3253

  48. Gonser M. Hemodynamic relationship between ophthalmicartery and uterine artery in pre-eclampsia: pulse wavereflection and transmission might provide the missinglink. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019; 53 (1): 135-36.doi:10.1002/uog.20121

  49. Gurgel Alves JA, Praciano De Sousa PC, Bezerra Maia EHolanda Moura S, Kane SC, Da Silva Costa F. First-trimestermaternal ophthalmic artery Doppler analysis for predictionof pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 44 (4):411-18. doi:10.1002/uog.13338

  50. Madina SR, Bacha R, Gilani SA, Fatima W, Awais W, FatimaH, et al. Comparison of the resistive indices obtained in theuterine artery and the ophthalmic artery in preeclampticand normotensive patients in Doppler US. J Ultrason 2020;20 (81): e95-e99. doi:10.15557/JOU.2020.0015

  51. Porto LB, Brandão AHF, Leite HV, Cabral ACV. Longitudinalevaluation of uterine perfusion, endothelial functionand central blood flow in early onset pre-eclampsia.Pregnancy Hypertens 2017; 10: 161-64. doi:10.1016/j.preghy.2017.08.005

  52. Aasaarikudiyil Vijayan M. Doppler sonography of maternalopthalmic, cubital and uterine arteries in hypertensivedisorders of pregnancy and normotensive pregnancy-across sectional study. Int J Toxicol Pharmacol Res 2022;12 (11): 109-19. http://impactfactor.org/PDF/IJTPR/12/IJTPR,Vol12,Issue11,Article14.pdf

  53. Barcelos Porto L, Fulgêncio Brandão AH, Leite HV, VieiraCabral AC. Longitudinal evaluation of uterine perfusion,endothelial function and central blood flow in early onsetpre-eclampsia. Pregnancy Hypertens 2017; 10: 161-64.doi:10.1016/j.preghy.2017.08.005

  54. Sinkey RG, Battarbee AN, Bello NA, Ives CW. Prevention,diagnosis and management of hypertensive disordersof pregnancy: a comparison of International Guidelines.Curr Hypertens Rep 2021; 22 (9): 139-48. doi:10.1007/s11906-020-01082-w.

  55. MacDonald TM, Walker SP, Hannan NJ, Tong S, Kaitu’u-Lino TJ. Clinical tools and biomarkers to predict preeclampsia.eBioMedicine 2022; 75: 103780. doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103780

  56. Ramos JGL, Sass N, Costa SMH. Preeclampsia: definitionsof hypertensive states during pregnancy pathophysiologicalfoundations. UpToDate 2017; 39: 496-512. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28793357/

  57. Sperling J, Gosset DR. Screening for Preeclampsia and theUSPSTF Recommendations. JAMA 2017; 317 (16): 1629-30.doi:10.1001/jama.2016.18315

  58. Brown MA, Magee LA, Kenny LC, et al. The hypertensivedisorders of pregnancy: ISSHP classification, diagnosis andmanagement recommendations for international practice.Pregnancy Hypertens 2018; 13: 291-310. doi:10.1016/j.preghy.2018.05.004

  59. Perry H, Khalil A, Thilaganathan B. Preeclampsia and thecardiovascular system: An update. Trends Cardiovasc Med2018; 28 (8): 505-13. doi:10.1016/j.tcm.2018.04.009

  60. Bokslag A, van Weissenbruch M, Mol BW, de Groot CJM.Preeclampsia: short and long-term consequences formother and neonate. Early Hum Dev 2016; 102: 47-50.doi:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2016.09.007

  61. Sapantzoglou I, Wright A, Arozena MG, Campos RV, CharakidaM, Nicolaides KH. Ophthalmic artery Doppler incombination with other biomarkers in prediction of preeclampsiaat 19-23 weeks’ gestation. Ultrasound ObstetGynecol 2021; 57 (1): 75-83. doi:10.1002/uog.23528

  62. Oliveira De Aquino L, Leite HV, Cabral ACV, Brandão AHF.Doppler flowmetry of ophthalmic arteries for prediction ofpre-eclampsia. Rev Assoc Med Bras 2014; 60 (6): 538-41.doi:10.1590/1806-9282.60.06.011

  63. Matias DS, Santos R, Ferreira T, Matias BS, Correia LCL.Predictive value of ophthalmic artery Doppler velocimetryin relation to hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. J ClinUltrasound 2020; 48 (7): 388-95. doi:10.1002/jcu.22823

  64. Praciano De Souza PC, Gurgel Alves JA, Bezerra Maia EHolanda Moura S, Araujo Júnior E, Martins WP, Da SilvaCosta F. Second trimester screening of preeclampsia usingmaternal characteristics and uterine and ophthalmic arteryDoppler. Ultraschall der Medizin 2018; 39 (2): 190-97.doi:10.1055/s-0042-104649

  65. Melo PFMV, Roever L, Mendonça TMS, Silva Costa F, RolnikDL, Diniz ALD. Ophthalmic artery Doppler in the complementarydiagnosis of Preeclampsia: a systematic reviewand meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2022; 9:1-11. doi:10.1186/s12884-023-05656-9

  66. Kalafat E, Laoreti A, Khalil A, Da Silva Costa F, ThilaganathanB. Ophthalmic artery Doppler for prediction of pre-eclampsia:systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound ObstetGynecol 2018; 51 (6): 731-37. doi:10.1002/uog.19002

  67. Matias DS, Costa RF, Matias BS, Gordiano L, Correia LCL.Predictive value of ophthalmic artery Doppler velocimetryin relation to development of pre-eclampsia. UltrasoundObstet Gynecol 2014; 44 (4): 419-26. doi:10.1002/uog.13313

  68. Selima ER, Abar AM, Dessouky BAE. Role of OphthalmicArtery Doppler in Prediction of Preeclampsia. EgyptJ Hosp Med 2022; 87 (1): 1944-52. doi:10.21608/EJHM.2022.231664

  69. Sarno M, Wright A, Vieira N, Sapantzoglou I, Charakida M,Nicolaides KH. Ophthalmic artery Doppler in combinationwith other biomarkers in prediction of pre-eclampsia at35-37 weeks’ gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2021;57 (4): 600-6. doi:10.1002/uog.23517

  70. Gana N, Sarno M, Vieira N, Wright A, Charakida M, NicolaidesKH. Ophthalmic artery Doppler at 11-13 weeks’gestation in prediction of pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound ObstetGynecol 2022; 59 (6): 731-36. doi:10.1002/uog.24914

  71. Olatunji RB, Adekanmi AJ, Obajimi MO, Roberts OA, OjoTO. Maternal ophthalmic artery Doppler velocimetry in preeclampsiain Southwestern Nigeria. Int J Womens Health2015; 7: 723-34. doi:10.2147/IJWH.S86314




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com