medigraphic.com
ISSN 1659-1046 (Impreso)
Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences

2021, Número 2

<< Anterior Siguiente >>

Odovtos-Int J Dent Sc 2021; 23 (2)


Evaluación de la resistencia adhesiva de las resinas bulk-fill a la dentina con diferentes tratamientos de superficie

Bas K, Uslu CE

Idioma: Ingles.
Referencias bibliográficas: 46
Paginas: 90-103
Archivo PDF: 494.25 Kb.


RESUMEN

Propósito: El objetivo de este estudio es comparar la resistencia adhesiva al cizallamiento de tres resinas compuestas de relleno de alta viscosidad aplicadas como capas individuales de 4 mm de espesor y de una resina compuesta microhíbrida aplicada de forma incremental con un espesor de 2mm en superficies de dentina preparadas con diferentes métodos de preparación de la superficie. Materiales y métodos: Se utilizaron un total de 132 molares humanos sin caries cuyas dentinas habían sido expuestas. Se formaron tres grupos, cada uno con 44 dientes. El grupo ácido se grabó con ácido fosfórico al 32%; el grupo láser se grabó con Er, Cr; el láser YSGG y el grupo de control se preparó con papel de carburo de silicio. Después de la aplicación del agente adhesivo, se aplicaron materiales de resina compuesta en los dientes utilizando moldes de teflón de 4x4mm. A continuación, las muestras se sometieron a pruebas de resistencia adhesiva al cizallamiento. Se aplicó el análisis de varianza bidireccional y la prueba de comparación múltiple Tukey HSD a los datos recogidos. Resultados: Hubo una diferencia significativa entre los métodos de tratamiento de superficie utilizados en cuanto a la resistencia adhesiva al cizallamiento (P‹0,001). Los valores más altos se detectaron en el grupo "Ácido" mientras que los valores más bajos se detectaron en el grupo "Control". Por otra parte, no hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre las resinas compuestas (P›0,05). Conclusiones: El grabado láser de los tejidos de la dentina no es tan eficaz como el grabado al ácido. Las resinas de relleno bulk-fill tuvieron efectos similares en comparación con las resinas compuestas convencionales en lo que respecta a la rsistencia adhesiva. Se necesitan más estudios in vitro apoyados con datos clínicos para investigar el rendimiento de los composites de relleno y el láser.


REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

  1. Kwon Y., Ferracane J., Lee I.B. Effect of layering methods, composite type, and flowable liner on the polymerization shrinkage stress of light cured composites. Dent Mater. 2012; 28: 801-809.

  2. Kim R.J., Son S.A., Hwang J.Y., et al. Comparison of photopolymerization temperature increases in internal and external positions of composite and tooth cavities in real time: Incremental fillings of microhybrid composite vs. bulk filling of bulk fill composite. J Dent. 2015; 43 (9): 1093-1098.

  3. Kim R.J., Kim Y.J., Choi N.S., et al. Polymerization shrinkage, modulus, and shrinkage stress related to tooth-restoration interfacial debonding in bulk-fill composites. J Dent. 2015; 43 (4): 430-439.

  4. Karadas M., Hatipoglu O., ER H., et al. Influence of different light-curing units on monomer elution from bulk fill composites. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2018; 32, (23): 2631-2646.

  5. Ilie N., Bucuta S., Draenert M. Bulk-fill resin-based composites: an in vitro assesment of their mechanical performance. Oper Dent. 2013; 38 (6): 618-625.

  6. Bucuta S., Ilie N. Light transmittance and micro-mechanical properties of bulk fill vs. conventional resin based composites. Clin Oral Invest. 2014; 18 (8): 1991-2000.

  7. Yousaf A., Aman N., Manzoor M.A., et al. Postoperative sensitivity of self etch versus total etch adhesive. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2014; 24 (6): 383-6.

  8. Dunn W.J., Davis J.T., Bush A.C. Shear bond strength and SEM evaluation of composite bonded to Er: YAG laser-prepared dentin and enamel. Dent Mater. 2005; 21 (7): 616-24.

  9. Yazici R., Karaman E., Tuncer D., et al. Er A. Effect of an Er,Cr:YSGG laser preparation on dentin bond strength of a universal adhesive. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2016; 30 (22): 2477-2484.

  10. Kilinc E., Roshkind D.M., Antonson S.A., et al. Thermal safety of Er:YAG and Er,Cr:YSGG lasers in hard tissue removal. Photomed Laser Surg. 2009; 27 (4): 565-70.

  11. Dederich D.N., Bushick R.D. Lasers in dentistry: separating science from hype. J Am Dent Assoc. 2004; 135 (2): 204-12; quiz 229.

  12. Hossain M., Nakamura Y., Yamada Y., et al. Effects of Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation in human enamel and dentin: ablation and morphological studies. J Clin Laser Med Surg. 1999; 17 (4): 155-9.

  13. Moritz A., Schoop U., Strapl M., Wintner E., Moritz A., Beer F., et al. Cavity preparation. Oral Laser Application Berlin: Quintessenz. 2006; 75-136.

  14. Van Meerbeek B., De Munck J., Mattar D., et al. Microtensile bond stregths of an etch and rinse and self-etch adhesives to enamel and dentin as a function of surface treatment. Oper Dent. 2003; 28 (5): 647-60.

  15. Marshall G.W. Dentine microhardnes and characterisation. Quintessence Int. 1993; 24 (9): 606-17.

  16. Versluis A., Tantbirojn D., Douglas W.H. Why do shear bond tests pull out dentin? J Dent Res. 1997; 76 (6): 1298-307.

  17. Ansari Z.J., Fekrazad R., Feizi S., et al. The effect of an Er,Cr:YSGG laser on the micro-shear bond strength of composite to the enamel and dentin of human permanent teeth. Lasers Med Sci. 2012; 27 (4): 761-5.

  18. Misilli T., Gönülol N., Cabadağ Ö.G., et al. The effect of curing lights and modes on dentin bond strength of bulk-fill composites applied in different thickness. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2019, 33 (10): 2281-91

  19. Tulga A., Saraç D. Effects of Dentin Surface Treatments on Hypersensitivity to Bond

  20. Strength of Restorations: An In Vitro Study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2015; 35 (5): e66-e74

  21. Shamrani A.S.A. An in-vitro assessment of micro-shear bond strength of a nano adhesive to dentin with different types of composite restorative systems. J Dent Health Oral Disord Ther. 2016; 5 (2): 240-244.

  22. Colak H., Ercan E., Hamidi M.M. Shear bond strength of bulk- fill and nano-restorative materials to dentin. Eur J Dent. 2016, 10 (1): 40-45.

  23. Takada M., Shinkai K., Kato C., et al. Bond strength of composite resin to enamel and dentin prepared with Er,Cr:YSGG laser. Dent Mater J. 2015; 34 (6): 863-71.

  24. Obeidi A., McCracken M.S., Liu P.R., Litaker M.S., Beck P., Rahemtulla F. Enhancement of bonding to enamel and dentin prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser. Lasers Surg Med. 2009 Aug; 41 (6): 454-62.

  25. Flury S., Peutzfoldt A. and Lussi A. Influnce of increment thickness on microhardness and dentin bond strength of bulk fill resin composites. Dent Mater. 2014; 30 (10):1104-12.

  26. Usumez A., Aykent F. Bond strengths of porcelain laminate veneers to tooth surfaces prepared with acid and Er,Cr:YSGG laser etching. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 90: 24-30.

  27. Martínez-Insua A., da Silva Dominguez L., Rivera F.G., et al. Differences in bonding to acid-etched or Er: YAG-laser-treated enamel and dentin surfaces. J Prosthet Dent. 2000; 84 (3): 280-8.

  28. Ceballos L., Toledano M., Osorio R., et al. ER-YAG laser pretreatment effect on in vitro secondary caries formation around composite restorations. Am J Dent. 2001; 14 (1): 46-9.

  29. Olivi M., Olivi G. Physics of Laser. Lasers in Restorative Dentistry, Berlin: Springer; 2015; 39-50.

  30. Carvalho A.O., Reis A.F., de Oliveira M.T., et al. Bond Strength of Adhesive Systems to Er, Cr:YSGG Laser-Irradiated Dentin. Photomed Laser Surg. 2011; 29 (11): 747-52.

  31. Jeevarathan J., Aravind I. , Ponnuduraiet A., et al. Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Composite Resin Bonded to Acid Etched and Lased Primary Enamel (Er, Cr: YSGG). Indian J Public Health Res Dev. 2019, 10 (6): 171-75.

  32. Lee B.S., Lin P.Y., Chen M.H., et al. Tensile bond strength of Er,Cr:YSGG laser-irradiated human dentin and analysis of dentin-resin interface. Dent Mater. 2007; 23 (5): 570-8.

  33. Pashley D.H., Carvalho R.M. Dentin permeability and dentin adhesion. J Dent. 1997; 25 (5): 355-72.

  34. Sung E.C., Chenard T., Caputo A.A., et al. Composite resin bond strength to primary dentin prepared with Er, Cr:YSSG laser. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2005; 30 (1): 45-9.

  35. Ilie N., Schoner C., Bucher K., et al. An in-vitro assessment of the shear bond strength of bulk-fill resin composites to permanent and deciduous teeth. J Dent. 2014; 42 (7): 850-5.

  36. Omran T.A., Garoushi S, Abdulmajeed AA, et al. Influence of increment thickness on dentin bond strength and light transmission of composite base materials. Clin Oral Investig. 2017; 21 (5): 1717-1724.

  37. Seyhan Cezairli N., Küçükekenci A.S., Başoğlu H. Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength Between Orthodontic Brackets and Three Aged Bulk Fill Composites. ODOVTOS-Int. J. Dent. Sc. | No. 21-3, 89-99, 2019.

  38. Guler C., Keskin G., Görgen V.A., et al. Süt Dişlerinde Farklı Renklerdeki Kompomerlerin Mikrogerilim Bağlanma Dayanımlarının Değerlendirilmesi. Turkiye Klinikleri J Dental Sci 2013; 19 (2): 106-12

  39. El Araby A.M., Talic Y.F. (2007). The effect of thermocycling on the adhesion ofselfetching adhesives on dental enamel and dentin. J Contemp Dent Pract, 8 (2): 17-24.

  40. Mandava J., Vegesna D.P., Ravi R., Boddeda M.R., et al. Microtensile bond strength of bulk-fill restorative compos¬ites to dentin. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017;9(8):e1023-8. 40. Yamanel K. Farklı restoratif materyallerle restore edilen abraksiyon lezyonlu dişlerde oluşan streslerin 3 boyutlu sonlu elemanlar analizi kullanılarak değerlendirilmesi. A.Ü. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg. 45 (3) 115-125, 2018.

  41. Rizzante F.A.P., Mondelli R.F.L., Furuse A.Y., et al. Shrinkage stress and elastic modulus assessment of bulk-fill composites. J Appl Oral Sci. 2019; 27: e20180132.

  42. Wieczkowski, G.Jr., Joynt R.B., Klockowski R., et al. Effects of incremental versus bulk fill technique on resistance to cuspal fracture of teeth restored with posterior composites. J Prosthet Dent. 1998; 60 (3). 283-287.

  43. Yap A.U. Effectiveness of polymerization in composite restoratives claiming bulk placement: impact of cavity depth and exposure time. Oper Dent. Mar-Apr 2000; 25 (2): 113-20.

  44. Benetti A.R., Havndrup-Pedersen C., Honoré D. et al. Bulk-fill resin composites: Polymerization contraction, depth of cure, and gap formation. Oper Dent. 2015; 40: 190-200.

  45. https://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/976634O/filtek-bulk-fill-posterior-restorative-technical-product-profile.pdf

  46. Leprince J.G., Palin W.M., Vanacker J., et al. Physicomechanical characteristics of commercially available bulk-fill composites. J Dent. 2014; 42 (8): 993-1000.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com