Table 5: Incremental cost-effectiveness analyses: evolocumab added to SoC vs SoC alone. |
||||||
Scenarios |
PHMD plus history of MI or IS |
HeFH |
||||
Δ Cost |
Δ LY |
ICER |
Δ Cost |
Δ LY |
ICER |
|
Base-case |
$554,560 |
1.59 |
$348,629 |
$683,660 |
2.29 |
$298,148 |
5% increase in EVO price |
$582,237 |
1.59 |
$366,029 |
$719,364 |
2.29 |
$313,719 |
5% decrease in EVO price |
$526,883 |
1.59 |
$331,230 |
$647,956 |
2.29 |
$282,578 |
High discount rates* |
$474,304 |
1.26 |
$376,837 |
$560,506 |
1.70 |
$329,364 |
Low discount rates‡ |
$661,415 |
3.15 |
$209,861 |
$860,832 |
5.58 |
$154,371 |
Use of CTTC rate ratios§ |
$474,681 |
1.23 |
$384,626 |
$567,491 |
1.83 |
$310,261 |
PHMD = primary hypercholesterolemia and mixed dyslipidemia; HeFH = heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia; LY = life years; ICER = incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; EVO = evolocumab. The symbol Δ denotes incremental. * An annual rate of 7% for both costs and LY.32 ‡ Annual rates of 3% and 0% (i.e., undiscounted) for costs and LY,32 respectively. § 0.73 (myocardial infarction), 0.79 (ischemic stroke), and 0.86 (cardiovascular death) per 1 mmol/L of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction.21 Note: All costs and ICER values are expressed in Mexican pesos. |