medigraphic.com
ISSN 2448-8909 (Print)

2000, Number 6

Next >>

Med Crit 2000; 14 (6)

Validation of Simplified Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (TISS-28) in Mexican population. Multicenter study

Sánchez VLD, Reyes SME, DEctor LDM, González GA, Magdaleno PML, González VMG

Language: Spanish
References: 10
Page: 191-196
PDF size: 180.86 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective: To evaluate the Simplified Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (TISS-28) in Mexico.
Design: Prospective multicentric study.
Setting: Four ICUs of a tertiary hospitals of Mexico City.
Patients and methods: Three hundred eighty five were enrolled. Demographic variables, and scores of APACHE II, TISS-76 and TISS-28 were registered daily.
Interventions: None.
Results: A total of 1,298 pairs of TISS-28 and TISS-76 measurements were made. The value of TISS-28 was 26.5 ± 8.5 (range 5-61) and TISS-76 26.5 ± 8.8 (range 3-62). The Pearson coefficient was 0.929 (p ‹ 0.01).
Conclusion: A good correlation between TISS-28 and TISS-76 was observed. TISS-28 may be applied in our country.


REFERENCES

  1. Cullen DJ, Civetta JM et al. Therapeutic intervention scoring system: A method for quantitative comparison of patient care. Crit Care Med 1974; 2: 57-60.

  2. Keene AR, Cullen DJ. Therapeutic intervention scoring system: Update 1983. Crit Care Med 1983; 11(1): 1-3.

  3. Slatyer MA, James OF, Moore PG et al. Costs, severity of illnesss and outcome in intensive care. Anaesth Intensive Care 1986: 14: 381-9.

  4. Miranda DR, Williams A, Loirat P. Management of Intensive Care: Guidelines for better use of resources, Dordrecht. Kluwer Academic Publishers 1990.

  5. Mälstam J, Lind L. Therapeutic intervention scoring system (TISS) -a method for measuring workload and calculating cost in the ICU. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1992; 36: 758-63.

  6. Miranda DR, Rijk AS. Simplified therapeutic intervention scoring system. The TISS-28 items-results from a multicenter study. Crit Care Med 1996; 24(1): 64-73.

  7. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP et al. APACHE II. A severity of disease classification. Crit Care Med 1985; 13: 818-29.

  8. Knaus WA, Wagner DP, Draper EA et al. The APACHE III prognostic system: Risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults. Chest 1991; 100: 1619-36.

  9. Sage WM, Rosenthal MH, Silverman JF. Is intensive care worth it? An assessment of input and outcome for the criticallyill. Crit Care Med 1986; 14: 777-82.

  10. Horst HM, Mild LJ, Farouck NO et al. The relationship of scoring systems and mortality in the surgical intensive care unit. Am Surg 1987; 53: 456-9.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com