medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Medicina Interna de México

Colegio de Medicina Interna de México.
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2021, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Med Int Mex 2021; 37 (1)

Scientific retractions in the era COVID-19

Del Carpio-Orantes L
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 8
Page: 119-121
PDF size: 315.92 Kb.


Key words:

COVID-19, Preprint, Peer review.

ABSTRACT

We carry out this document based on the phenomenon of scientific retractions that have arisen during the pandemic, favored by the dissemination of preprints that sometimes have not had meritorious peer review of all scientific documentation and that leads to the premature publication of findings or data that many times, after a formal analysis, it is shown that they do not provide the comments; on other occasions, these publications are influenced by pharmacists or groups of researchers who seek to dominate the area with anomalous data and which they cannot demonstrate to the public light for analysis. This phenomenon has been observed previously; however, during the COVID-19 pandemic, it has boomed and increased.


REFERENCES

  1. Bunge MA. El planteamiento científico. Rev Cubana Salud Pública 2017; 43 (3): 1-29.

  2. Gutiérrez, Sneider A, Barbosa, Hamilton J, et al. La retractación y la corrección de la literatura científica para conservar la integridad y la confianza en la ciencia: un análisis de retractaciones de publicaciones biomédicas de libre acceso en PubMed, 1959-2015. Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales 2016; 40 (157): 568-579. https://dx.doi.org/10.18257/raccefyn.399.

  3. Wakefield AJ, Murch SH, Anthony A, Linnell J, et al. RETRACTED: Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children. Lancet 1998; 351 (9103): 637-641. doi. 10.1016/S0140- 6736(97)11096-0.

  4. Fanelli D, Tregenza T. How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey Data. PLoS ONE 2009; 4 (5). doi. 10.1371/journal. pone.0005738.

  5. Benson PJ. Seven sins in publishing (but who’s counting…). Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2016; 98 (1): 1-5. doi. 10.1308/ rcsann.2016.0046.

  6. Chan G. Top 10 retractions of 2017. The Scientist 2017 https://www.the-scientist.com/research-round-up/top- 10-retractions-of-2017-29834.

  7. Retraction Watch via CDC; https://retractionwatch.com/ retracted-coronavirus-covid-19-papers/

  8. https://publons.com/publon/covid-19/?sort_by=date.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Med Int Mex. 2021;37