2020, Number 1
<< Back Next >>
Rev Cub Oftal 2020; 33 (1)
Donor cornea characterization by endothelial microscopy
Castillo PAC, Pérez PZ, Noriega MJ, Jareño OM, Benítez MMC, García MJ
Language: Spanish
References: 23
Page: 1-10
PDF size: 312.10 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Objective: Determine the characteristics of the corneal endothelium by endothelial
microscopy.
Methods: A retrospective descriptive study was conducted of donor corneas from the eye bank of Ramón Pando Ferrer Cuban Institute of Ophthalmology from January to June 2019. The
sample was 224 donor corneas. The variables analyzed were age, previous surgery, gerontoxon, pterygium, epithelial defects, corneal infiltrate, corneal opacity, edema, endothelial pigments, guttae, Descemet's membrane detachment, cell density, hexagonality and polymegethism.
Results: Gerontoxon was the most common finding (56.69%), mean cell density was 2 501
cell/mm2, mean variation coefficient was 43.32 and mean hexagonality was 50.02. Endothelial
cell density from 2 000 to 2 500 cell/mm2 was more common in the 60-79 years age group
(76.72%), whereas in the 20-29 years age group all the donor corneas had an endothelial
density above 2 500 cell/mm2.
Conclusions: Gerontoxon was the most common finding in the biomicroscopic examination of
the cornea. Endothelial microscopy found that most corneas were suitable for corneal
transplantation. A corneal endothelium with a cell density above 2 500 cell/mm2 is not
exclusive of corneas under 60 years of age.
REFERENCES
Rodríguez Díaz WLV. Percepción de los medios de comunicación sobre la donación y trasplantes de órganos y tejidos en la República Dominicana. Tesis de Maestría; 2013 [acceso: 12/01/2020]. Disponible en: http://masteralianza.ont.es/download/tesinas_master_2013/Wanda%20Rodriguez.pdf
Cunningham WJ, Brookes NH, Twohill HC, Moffatt SL, Pendergrast DG, Stewart JM, et al. The New Zealand National Eye Bank Study: Trends in the Acquisition and Storage of Cornea Tissue over the Decade 2000 to 2009. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2012;40(2):141-7.
Sharma N, Agarwal P, Titiyal JS, Kumar C, Sinha R, Vajpayee RB. Optimal Use of Donor Corneal Tissue: One Cornea for Two Recipients. Cornea. 2011;30(10):1140-4.
Zhang J, Sisley AM, Anderson AJ, Taberner AJ, McGhee CN, Patel D. Characterization of a novel collagen scaffold for corneal tissue engineering. Eng Part C Meth. 2016;22(2):165-72.
Gain P, Jullienne R, He Z, Aldossary M, Acquart S, Cognasse F, et al. Global survey of corneal transplantation and eye banking. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016;134:167-73.
Claesson M, Armitage WJ, Fagerholm P, Stenevi U. Visual outcome in corneal grafts: a preliminary analysis of the Swedish Corneal Transplant Register. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86:174- 80.
Ewete T, Alabi A, Ani E. Normal corneal endothelial cell density in Nigerians. Clin Ophthalmol [Internet]. 2016 [acceso: 12/01/2020];10:497. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27051271%5Cnhttp://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articleren der.fcgi?artid=PMC4807938
McCarey BE, Edelhauser HF, Lynn and MJ. Review of Corneal Endothelial Specular Microscopy for FDA Clinical Trials of Refractive Procedures, Surgical Devices and New Intraocular Drugs and Solutions. Cornea. 2008;27(1):1-16.
Bruinsma M, Lie JT, Groeneveld-van Beek EA, Liarakos VS, van der Wees J, Melles GR. Are Polymegethism, Pleomorphism and “Poor Swelling” Valid Discard Parameters in Immediate Postmortem Evaluation of Human Donor Corneal Endothelium? Cornea. 2013;32(3):285-9.
Cunningham WJ, Brookes NH, Twohill HC, Moffatt SL, Pendergrast DG, Stewart JM, et al. The New Zealand National Eye Bank Study: Trends in the Acquisition and Storage of Corneal Tissue over the Decade 2000 to 2009. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2012;40(2):141-7.
Gasser L, Reinhard T, Böhringer D. Comparison of corneal endothelial cell measurements by two non-contact specular microscopes. BMC Ophthalmol [Internet]. 2015 [acceso: 12/01/2020];15(1):87. Disponible en: http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/s12886-015- 0068-1.pdf
Verdiguel-Sotelo K. Calidad de tejido corneal procurado por personal médico capacitado. Rev Med Inst Mex Seg Soc. 2016;54(6):688-95.
Gain P, Thuret G, Chiquet C, Rizzi P, Pugniet JL, Acquart S, et al. Cornea procurement from very old donors: post organ culture cornea outcome and recipient graft outcome. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86(4):404-11.
Espinosa Barberi G. Estudio descriptivo de los donantes y receptores de un banco de ojos. Arch Soc Canar Oftalmol. 2019;30:27-32.
Jabbar A, Nagpure S. Quality control of corneal tissue processed and issued by a reference eye bank. Ker J Ophthalmol. 2012;24(1):56-60.
Rootman DB, Wankiewicz E, Sharpen L, Baxter SA. In situ versus whole-globe harvesting of corneal tissue from remote donor sites: effects on initial tissue quality. Cornea. 2007;26(3):270-3.
Abib FC, Holzchuh R, Schaefer A, Schaefer T, Godois R. The endothelial sample size analysis in corneal specular microscopy clinical examinations. Cornea [Internet]. 2012 [acceso: 12/01/2020];31(5):546-50. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22333658
Márquez Villalón S. Modificaciones del endotelio corneal en el paciente adulto mayor. Rev Cubana Oftalmol. 2014;27(4):2.
Contreras-Corona RG, Anaya-Pavab EJ, Gallegos-Valencia AJ, Villarreal-Maíz JA. Densidad y morfología de células del endotelio corneal en adultos jóvenes del norte de México. Rev Mex Oftalmol. 2014 [acceso: 12/01/2020];88(3). Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mexoft.2014.02.002
Guerra Almaguer M. Morfología y morfometría del endotelio corneal. Rev Cubana Oftalmol. 2015;28(3):366-73.
Contreras-Corona RG. Densidad y morfología de células del endotelio corneal en adultos jóvenes del norte de México. Rev Mex Oftalmol. 2014;88(3):99-103.
Mokey Castellanos MO. El banco de ojos y el donante idóneo. Rev Cubana Oftalmol. 2007 [acceso: 12/01/2020];20(2). Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0864-21762007000200019
Gal RL, Dontchev M, Beck RW. The effect of donor age on corneal transplantation outcome results of the cornea donor study. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:620-6.