de Lima NAV, da Fonseca SM, Pereira SVE

Language: Portugués
References: 22
Page: 1-14
PDF size: 336.04 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The use of technologies in the field of health is a reality and contributes to the promotion of patient safety. Objective: To identify, in the scientific literature, the relationship between the types of technologies and patient safety.
Methods: This is an integrative review carried out between November and December 2016, based on the search in the databases Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature, Web of science, SCOPUS, and Latin American and Caribbean Literature in Health Sciences. The gathering of articles was carried out with the use of descriptors controlled within health sciences: seguridad del paciente [patient safety], tecnologías en salud [health technologies],servicios de salud [health services], and MeSH. Publications available for free in full text and electronic media were included, together with articles that address the topic of interest in the Portuguese, English and Spanish languages, without temporal delimitation. Publications in editorial format, letter to the editor, review and opinion articles and duplicate articles were excluded from the study. The selected articles were analyzed by descriptive statistics and presented in tables.
Conclusion: Although it has been shown that the use of technologies improves safety and quality in care, a greater focus on mild and mild-hard technologies is necessary, once they are essential for care.

REFERENCES

1. Brasil. Decreto n° 7.646, de 21 de dezembro de 2011. Regulamenta a composição, as competências e o funcionamento da Comissão Nacional de Incorporação de Tecnologias no Sistema Único de Saúde e sobre o processo administrativo para incorporação, exclusão e alteração de tecnologias em saúde pelo Sistema Único de Saúde - SUS, e dá outras providências. Brasília (DF). 2011 [acesso: 23/12/2016]. Disponible en: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_Ato2011-2014/2011/Decreto/D7646.htm

2. Franco TB, Merhy EE. Cartografias do trabalho e cuidado em saúde. Tempus. 2012;6(2):151-63.

3. Ministério da Saúde (BR). Portaria n. 529 do Ministério da Saúde, de 1º de abril de 2013. Institui o Programa Nacional de Segurança do Paciente (PNSP). Brasília (DF). 2013 [acesso: 23/12/2016]. Disponible en: bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/gm/2013/prt0529_01_04_2013.html.

4. Koivunen M, Niemi A, Hupli M. The use of electronic devices for communication with colleagues and other healthcare professionals–nursing professionals’ perspectives. J. adv. nurs. 2015;71(3):620-31.

5. Orbaek J, Gaard M, Fabricius P, Lefevre RS, Moller T. Patient safety and technology-driven medication–A qualitative study on how graduate nursing students navigate through complex medication administration. Nurse educ. pract. 2015;15(3):203-11.

6. Mason JJ, Roberts-Turner R, Amendola V, Sill AM, Hinds PS. Patient Safety, Error Reduction, and Pediatric Nurses' Perceptions of Smart Pump Technology. J. pediatr. nurs. 2014;29(2):143-51.

7. Soares CB, Hoga LAK, Peduzzi M, Sangaleti C, Yonekura T, Silva DRAD. Revisão integrativa: conceitos e métodos utilizados na enfermagem. Rev. Esc. Enferm. USP. 2014;48(2):335-45.

8. Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). Levels of Evidence 2013. 2013 [acesso: 01/04/2015]. Disponible en: http://joannabriggs.org/jbi-approach.html#tabbed-nav = Levels-of-Evidence

9. Mendes ME, Ebner PAR, Romano P, Pacheco NM, Sant’anna A. Practical aspects of the use of FMEA tool in clinical laboratory risk management. J. Bras. Patol. Med. Lab. 2013;49(3):174-81.

10. Encinosa WE, Bae J. Health information technology and its effects on hospital costs, outcomes, and patient safety. Inquiry. 2011;48(4):288-303.

11. Fowler SB, Sohler P, Zarillo DF. Bar-code technology for medication administration: medication errors and nurse satisfaction. Medsurg nurs. 2009;18(2):103-9.

12. Trbovich PL, Pinkney S, Cafazzo JA, Easty AC. The impact of traditional and smart pump infusion technology on nurse medication administration performance in a simulated inpatient unit. Qual. saf. health care. 2010;19(1):430-4

13. Balka E, Doyle-Waters M, Lecznarowiczc D, FitzGerald JM. Technology, governance and patient safety: systems issues in technology and patient safety. Int. j. med. inf. 2007;76(1):35-47.

14. Rajkomar A, Farrington K, Mayer A, Walker D, Blandford A. Patients’ and carers’ experiences of interacting with home hemodialysis technology: implications for quality and safety. BMC nephrology. 2014;15(1):1-12.

15. Holden RJ. What stands in the way of technology-mediated patient safety improvements? A study of facilitators and barriers to physicians' use of electronic health records. J. patient saf. 2011;7(4):193-203.

16. Khunlertkit A, Carayon P. Contributions of tele–intensive care unit (Tele-ICU) technology to quality of care and patient safety. J. crit. care. 2013;28(3):315-26.

17. Poon EG, Keohane CA, Yoon CS, Ditmore M, Bane A, Levtzion-Korach O, et al. Effect of bar-code technology on the safety of medication administration. N. Engl. j. med. 2010; 362(18):1698-707.

18. Parente ST, Mccullough JS. Health information technology and patient safety: evidence from panel data. Health aff. 2009;28(2):357-60.

19. Appari,A, Johnson ME, Anthony DL. Information Technology and Hospital Patient Safety: A Cross-Sectional Study of US Acute Care Hospitals. The American J. of M. C. 2010;0(Spe):39-47.

20. Larsen GY, Parker HB, Cash J, O’Connell M, Grant MJC. Standard drug concentrations and smart-pump technology reduce continuous-medication-infusion errors in pediatric patients. Pediatrics. 2005;116(1):21-5.

21. Chaoa CC, Jenb WY, Hungc MC, Lid YC, Chie YP. An innovative mobile approach for patient safety services: The case of a Taiwan health care provider. Technovation. 2007;27(6):342-51.

22. World Alliance For Patient Safety. Forward Programme 2008-2009. Geneva (Swi): World Health Organization; 2010 [acesso: 23/12/2016]. Disponible en: http://www.who.int/patientsafety/information_centre/reports/Alliance_Forward_Programme_2008.pdf.