medigraphic.com
ISSN 1561-2937 (Print)

2019, Number S1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Cubana Cardiol Cir Cardiovasc 2019; 25 (S1)

Cuban registry of acute myocardial infarction (RECUIMA), the first 1000 cases

Santos MM, Rodríguez RM, Prohias MJ, Mata CLA, Martínez GG, Sellen SE, López RM, Padrosa SD

Language: Spanish
References: 33
Page:
PDF size: 941.39 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction. Most countries have health records of acute myocardial infarction that serve to make health decisions.
Objetive. To characterize the patients who graduated with acute myocardial infarction included in the Cuban registry of infarction.
Methods. A prospective, longitudinal, multicenter study was carried out in 7 health units in the period between January 2018 and April 2019. The universe of study was the patients admitted with acute coronary syndrome and the sample was the 1000 patients who were They graduated with a confirmed diagnosis of infarction, who were able to collect the study variables and have their data emptied in the RESCUE software. Descriptive statistics were used through percentage analysis for descriptive variables and arithmetic mean with standard deviation for quantitative variables.
Results. The 68.2% were male. The average age was 65 + 7 years. 78.0% were hypertensive. 30.4% of patients came late. 79.1% presented IMA CEST. The reperfusion treatment was performed at 46.4%. Only 5.2% were able to have coronary angiography during admission. 29.8% presented left ventricular dysfunction. ASA, clopidogrel and statins were prescribed at hospital discharge 96.2%, 95.5% and 94.5% respectively. 45.6% of patients referred to cardiac rehabilitation.
Conclusions. The majority of the patients were male, with ST-segment elevation infarction, with a low percentage of reperfusion and coronary angiography. Hypertension was the most frequent associated factor. At hospital discharge ASA, clopidogrel and statins are prescribed to more than 90% of patients.


REFERENCES

  1. Dionisio GF, Gómez G, Maris Machin S,Geronazzo RJ, Kevorkian R, Ferreiros E, et al. Comparación de dos registros de síndrome coronario agudo en la Argentina: STRATEG – SIA y SCAR (1999-2011). Rev Argent Cardiol 2015. 83(4): 300-304. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.7775/rac.es.v83.i4.6218.

  2. Posnenkova OM, Kiselev AR, Popova YV, GridnevVI, Prokhorov MD, Dovgalevsky PY, et al. Impact of patient-related and treatment-related factors on in-hospital mortality of patients with ST- elevation myocardial infarction: Data of Russian Acute Coronary Syndrome Registry. COR ET VASA. 2014;56 (3): e2127-e227. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crvasa.2014.03.004

  3. Prakash CN, Merwaha R, Panday D, Chauhan V,Guleri R. Multicenter HP ACS Registry. Indian Heart Journal. 2016; 68(2): i18-i27. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ihj.2015.07.027.

  4. Fiol M, Cabadés A, Sala J, Marrugat J, Elosua R,Vega G, et al. [Variability in the in-hospital management of acute myocardial infarction in Spain. IBERICA Study (Investigación, Búsqueda Específica y Registro de Isquemia Coronaria Aguda)] Spanish. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2001. 54(4): 443-52.

  5. Cabadés A, López-Bescós L, Arós F, Loma-Osorio A, Bosch X, Pabón P, et al. Variabilidad en el manejo y pronóstico a corto Y medio plazo del infarto de miocardio en España: el estudio PRIAMHO. Rev Esp Cardiol. 1999;52(10 ):767-75.

  6. Ferreira-González I, Permanyer-Miralda G, Marrugat J, Heras M,Cunat J, Civeira E, et al. Estudio MASCARA (Manejo del Síndrome Coronario Agudo. Registro Actualizado). Resultados globales. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2008; 61(8):803 -16.

  7. Barrabés JA, Bardají A, Jiménez-Candil J, delNogal Sáez F, Bodí V, Basterra N, et al. Pronostico y manejo del síndrome coronario agudo en España en 2012: estudio DIOCLES. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2015;68 (2):98 - 106. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.recesp.2014.03.010.

  8. Ruiz Bailén M, Rucabado Aguilar M, la Rosa SalasFJ, Galindo Rodríguez S, Castillo Rivera AM. Proyecto ARIAM: décimo aniversario. Med Intensiva. 2005; 29(8): 434 -6.

  9. Fernández S, Monreal M. Los registros depacientes y la investigación clínica. Rev Clin Esp. 2017; 217(1): 23-24. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rce.2017.11.005.

  10. Fothergill R, Brace-McDonnell SJ, Perkins GD.Resuscitation 2014;85: 1610-11.

  11. Socias L, Frontera G, Rubert C, Carrillo A, Peral V,Rodríguez A, et al. Análisis comparatives de 2 registros de infarto agudo de miocárdico tras una década de cambios. Estudio IBERICA (1996-1998) y Código Infarto – Illes Balears (2008-2010). Med Intensiva. 2016; 40(9):541-549. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.medin. 2016. 04.001.

  12. Ministerio de Salud Pública. Anuario Estadístico2016. La Habana: MINSAP; 2017. Disponible en: http://files.sld.cu/dne/files/2017/04/Anuario_2016_electronico-1.pdf.

  13. Armas Rojas NB, Ortega Torres YY, de la NovalGarcía R, Suarez Medina R, Llerena Rojas L, Dueñas Herrera AF. Letalidad por infarto agudo de miocárdico en Cuba, 1999-2008. Rev Cubana Cardiol Cir Cardiovasc 2011; 17(1):4-10.

  14. Braunwald E, Zipes D, Libby P. Braunwald´sCardiología: El libro de medicina cardiovascular. 10ma Ed. Massachussets: W.B.Saunders Company, 2016; 1266-1352.

  15. Morales Salinas A, Ramírez Gómez JI, CastañedaCasarvilla L, Machín Cabrera W, Álvarez Guerra L, Angulo Pardo R, et al. Registro hospitalario de infarto agudo de miocárdico en Santa Clara 2007-2008. CorSalud 2010;2(3):197-207.

  16. Ortega Torres YY, Armas Rojas NB, de la NovalGarcía R, Castillo Arocha I, Suarez Medina R, Dueñas Herrera AF. Incidencia del infarto agudo de miocárdico. Revista Cubana de Investigaciones Biomédicas 2011;30(3):345-353.

  17. Santos Medina M, Rodríguez Ramos M, ProhiasMartínez JA, Ochoa Montes LA, Dueñas Herrera A, De Lara Abad J. Bases metodológicas del registro cubano de infarto agudo del miocardio: de la utopía a la realidad. Rev Cubana Cardiol Cir Cardiovasc 2017; 24(2):4-10

  18. Santos Medina M, Parra Siscar JL, RabertFernández AR, Góngora Cortes D. Factores predictivos de eventos cardiacos adversos mayores en pacientes con infarto agudo del miocardio. Rev Cubana Cardiol Cir Cardiovasc 2018; 24(3):4-10

  19. García Castillo A, Jerjes Sánchez C, MartínezBermúdez P, Azpiri López R, Autrey Caballero A, Martínez Sánchez C, et al. Registro Mexicano de Síndromes Coronarios Agudos. RENASICA II. Arch Cardiol Mex 2005; 75: S6-S19.

  20. Roblova L, Tousek F, Tousek P, Pesl L, Horak D,Rokyta R, et al. Outcomes of patients hospitalized for suspected acute coronary syndrome, in whom the diagnosis was not confirmed: Results from the CZECH-1 and CZECH-2. COR ET VASA. 2015;57: e1-e-5. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10/1016/j.crvasa.2014.11.002

  21. Manemann SM, Gerber Y, Chamberlain AM,Dunlay SM, Bell M, Jaffe AS, et al. Acute Coronary Syndrome in the Community. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015; 90(5): 597-605. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10/1016/j.mayocp.2015.02.015.

  22. The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee. Myocardial infarction redefined—a consensus document of the Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the Redefinition of Myocardial Infarction. Eur Heart J. 2000;21:1502–13. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36: 959–69.

  23. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, White HD, Joint ESC/ACC/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Redefinition of Myocardial Infarction. Universal definition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:2525–38. Circulation 2007;116:2634–53; J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:2173–95.

  24. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Simoons ML,Chaitman BR, White HD. Writing Group on the Joint ESC/ACC/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction.Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J.2012;33:2551–67. Circulation 2012;126:2020–2035;J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;60:1581–98.

  25. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Chaitman BR,Bax JJ, Morrow DA, et al. Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2018). JACC 2018. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.08.1038

  26. Nallamothu BK, Bates ER, Wang T. Driving timesand distances to hospitals with percutaneous coronary intervention in the United States: implications for prehospital triage of patients with ST-elevatios myocardial infarction 2006;113(9):1189-1195.

  27. Franken M, Lima FG, Baracioli LM, Moreira HG,Nicolau JC. In- Hospital management of acute coronary syndromes in Brazil in comparison with other BRIC countries: analysis of the Brazilian registry of acute coronary syndromes. JACC. 2013; 61(10): E 1508.

  28. Steg PG, Bonnefoy E, Chabaud S, Lapostolle F,Dubien PY, Cristofini P, et al. Impact of time to treatment on mortality after prehospital fibrinolysis or primary angioplasty: data from the CAPTIM randomized clinical trial. Circulation. 2003 [citado el 12 de jun de 2016] ;108:2851-6. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14623806.

  29. Steg G, James SK, Atar D, Badano LP, BlomstromC, Borger MA, et al. Guía de práctica clínica de ESC para el manejo del infarto agudo de miocardio en pacientes con elevación del segmento ST. Rev Esp Cardiol [Internet].2013 [citado el 12 de ene de 2017]; 66(1): 53e1-e46. Disponible en: http://www.revespcardiol.org/en/guia-practica-clinica-esc-el/articulo/90180910/.

  30. Yusuf S, Zhao F, Mehta SR, et al. Effects ofclopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. N Engl J Med 2001;345:494-502

  31. Sabatine MS, Cannon CP, Gibson CM, et al.Addition of clopidogrel to aspirin and fibrinolytic therapy for myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation. N Engl J Med 2005;352:1179-89.

  32. López Sendón J, González Juanatey JR, PintodF.Indicadores de calidad en cardiología. Principalesindicadores para medir la calidad de los resultados (indicadores de resultados) y parámetros de calidad relacionados con mejores resultados en la práctica clínica (indicadores de práctica asistencial). INCARDIO (Indicadores de Calidad en Unidades Asistenciales del Área del Corazón): declaración de posicionamiento de consenso de SEC/SECTCV. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2015;68:976-95.) (Fernández Olmo MR. Situación actual de las Unidades de Rehabilitación Cardiaca en Andalucía: Estudio EnANPREC. Cardiocore. 2016. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10/1016/j.carcor.2016.08.004.

  33. Chew D, Huikuri H, Schmidt G, Kavanagh K,Dommasch M, Thomsen PE, et al. The degree of the left ventricular ejection fraction change following myocardial infarction predictor risk of sudden cardiac arrest. JACC 2015; 65(10S): 105.E, et al. The degree of the left ventricular ejection fraction change following myocardial infarction predictor risk of sudden cardiac arrest. JACC 2015; 65(10S): 105.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com