medigraphic.com
ISSN 1726-6718 (Electronic)
Revista Cubana de Anestesiología y Reanimación

2020, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Revista Cubana de Anestesiología y Reanimación 2020; 19 (1)

Total intravenous anesthesia: propofol/remifentanil vs midazolam/remifentanil in thoracic surgery

Falcón GM, Orizondo PSA, Alonso VJA, Nicolau CI

Language: Spanish
References: 35
Page: 1-17
PDF size: 315.05 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: Anesthesia administration techniques in thoracic surgery have undergone great evolution and greater scientific foundation. Total intravenous anesthesia based on analgesia favors the perioperative period without pain and recovery without complications.
Objective: To compare the effectiveness and safety of two techniques of total intravenous anesthesia in elective thoracic surgery with remifentanil as an analgesic base.
Methods: Prospective and causiexperimental study carried out at Dr. Salvador Allende Clinical-Surgical Teaching Hospital, in the period from January 2013 to January 2015, with 45 patients scheduled for elective thoracic surgery, who were divided into two groups according to the hypnotic drug used. Group A: propofol/remifentanil, and group B: midazolam/remifentanil. Hemodynamic variables were evaluated at different times during the intraoperative period. Oxygenation variables (PaO2 and SaO2) during unipulmonary ventilation and anesthetic recovery times.
Results: Patients older than 60 years predominated in the two groups, with a physical status of ASA III. There were no differences in arterial oxygenation between the groups. There was a decrease in systolic blood pressure in group A without significant differences. The recovery of anesthesia was significantly more delayed in group B.
Conclusions: The total intravenous anesthesia technique with remifentanil as an analgesic base associated with propofol was safe and effective in patients undergoing thoracic surgery.


REFERENCES

  1. Slinger PD, Campos JH. Anesthesia for Thoracic Surgery. En: Miller´s Anesthesia 7ma. Edición. Cap 59, Edit. Elsevier. 2009; pp: 1819-87.

  2. Ojeda González J, Paret Correa N, Ojeda Delgado L. Consideraciones sobre anestesia en cirugía torácica. Medisur. 2013 [acceso: 16/05/2019];11(5):[aprox. 21 p.]. Disponible en: http://medisur.sld.cu/index.php/medisur/article/view/2568

  3. Egan TD. Total intravenous anesthesia versus inhalation anesthesia: a drug delivery perspective. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2015; 29(Suppl 1): S3-6.

  4. Delgado R, Martínez R. Anestesia total intravenosa manual: pro y contras. Farmacología en Anestesia. 2013;36:259-61.

  5. Saavedra VA. Drogas en la TIVA. En: Saavedra VA. Anestesia Intravenosa. 2da ed. Med Panam. 2011; 245-53.

  6. Tafur L, Lema E. Anestesia total intravenosa: de la farmacéutica a la farmacocinética. Rev Colomb Anestesiol. 2010;38(2):215-31.

  7. Jaramillo JJ. TCI (Infusión controlada a objetivo) con propofol-fentanyl y cambios asociados en el índice biespectral en pacientes neuroquirúrgicos. Anestesia intravenosa guiada por BIS. Rev Mex Anestesiol. 2012;35(1):26-39.

  8. Glass PS, Shafer SL, Reves JG. Sistemas de administración de fármacos intravenosos. En: Miller RD. Anestesia. 6ta edición. Madrid. España: Elsevier; 2005, pp: 439-80.

  9. Capria JJ. Nuevos paradigmas en anestesia. ¿Por qué intravenosa total? Rev Mex Anestesiol. 2014 [acceso: 16/05/2019];37(Supl 1): S293. Disponible en: https://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/rma/cma-2014/cmas141bx.pdf

  10. El-Tahan MR, Regal M. Target-Controlled Infusion of Remifentanil without muscle relaxants allows acceptable surgical conditions during thoracotomy performed under sevoflurane anesthesia. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2015;29(6):1557-66.

  11. Scarci M, Joshi A, Attia R. In patients undergoing thoracic surgery is paravertebral block as effective as epidural analgesia for pain management? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010;10(1):92-6.

  12. Longas VJ, Cuartero LJ. Manual Anestesiólogo. URPA y REA. Madrid, Ed Ergon. 2012. pp. 205-6.

  13. Barash P, Cullen B, Stoelting RK, Cahalan MK, Stock MC. Anesthesia for Thoracic Surgery. En: Clinical Anesthesia. Cap 40. Ed Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Publishers 2011, pp: 635-50.

  14. Song SY, Jung JY, Cho MS, Kim JH, Ryu TH, Kim BI. Volume-controlled versus pressure-controlled ventilation-volume guaranteed mode during one-lung ventilation. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2014;67(4):258-63.

  15. Ulusoy H, Cekic B, Besir A, Geze S, Hocaoglu C, Akdogan A. Sevoflurane/remifentanil versus propofol/remifentanil for electroconvulsive therapy: comparison of seizure duration and haemodynamic responses. J Int Med Res. 2014;42(1):111-9.

  16. Labrada Despaigne A, Domínguez García Y, Fernández Wong R. Anestesia intravenosa total en pacientes con factores de riesgo coronario. Rev Cubana Anestesiol Reanimac. 2012 [acceso: 16/05/2019];11(2):81-88. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_ arttext&pid=S1726-67182012000200003

  17. Marana E, Colicci S, Meo F, Marana R, Proietti R. Neuroendocrine stress response in gynecological laparoscopy: TIVA with propofol versus sevoflurane anesthesia. J Clin Anesth. 2010;22(4):250-5.

  18. Masui K, Upton RN, Doufas AG, Coetzee JF, Kazama T, Mortier EP, et al. The performance of compartmental and physiologically based recirculatory pharmacokinetic models for propofol: A comparison using bolus, continuous, and target-controlled infusion data. Anesth Analg. 2010;111(2):368-79.

  19. Calvo R, Telletxea S, Leal N, Aguilera L, Suárez E, de la Fuente L, et al. Influence of formulation on propofol pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in anesthetized patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2004 [acceso: 16/05/2019];48(8):1038-48. Disponible en: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.00015172.2004.00467.x

  20. Fabbri LP, Nucera M, Marsili M, Al Malyan M, Becchi C. Ketamine, propofol and low dose remifentanil versus propofol and remifentanil for ERCP outside the operating room: Isketaminenot only a “rescuedrug”?. Med Sci Monit. 2012;18(9):575-80.

  21. Verdejo M. Eficiencia y seguridad de remifentanilo-propofol vs fentanilo-propofol para anestesia general intravenosa en legrado uterino instrumentado. Rev Med UAS. 2010;1(1):21-28.

  22. Yang XY, Xu X, Wu XM. A comparison of remifentanil versus sufentanil with target-controlled infusion in combined inhalation anesthesia forsurgical patients: effects on hemodynamics and postoperative recovery. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2011;91(12):828-31. (In Chinese).

  23. Gómez JM, Tafur LA, Quintero I, Figueroa S, Serna A. Gutiérrez A. Infusión manual única de remifentanil y propofol para anestesia en cirugía laparoscópica ginecológica: serie de casos. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2010;57(4):71-8.

  24. Caballero A. ¿Propofol-remifentanilo en cirugía laparoscópica? Rev Mex Anestesiol. 2014; 37(Supl. 1): S49-S50.

  25. Welzing L, Oberthuer A, Junghaenel S, Harnischmacher U, Stutzer H, Roth B. Remifentanil/midazolam versus fentanyl/midazolam for analgesia and sedation of mechanically ventilated neonates and young infants: a randomized controlled trial. Intensive Care Med. 2012;38(6):1017-24.

  26. Rosa Díaz J, Navarrete Zuazo V, Fernández Sanchez E. Variante de cálculo de infusión de midazolam en la TIVA manual. Rev Cubana Anestesiol Reanimac. 2013 [acceso: 16/05/2019];12(3):198-209. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract &pid=S172667182013000300004&lng=pt&nrm=iso&tlng=es

  27. Jun NH, Lee JW, Song JW, Koh JC, Park WS, Shim YH. Optimal effect-site concentration of remifentanil for preventing cough during emergence from sevoflurane-remifentanil anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 2010;65(9):930-5.

  28. Li C, Xu M, Wu Y, Li YS, Huang WQ, Liu KX. Limbremote ischemic preconditioning attenuates lung injury after pulmonary resection under propofol-remifentanil anesthesia: a randomized controlled study. Anesthesiology. 2014;121(2):249-59.

  29. Tang JX, Baranofv D, Hammond M. Human Alzheimer and inflammation biomarkers after anesthesia and surgery. Anesthesiology. 2011 [acceso: 16/05/2019];115(4):727-32. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3429370/

  30. Criollo FH, Muñoz JH. Perfusiones intravenosas en modo manual: una estrategia simplificada mediante sistemas de gravedad. Rev Mex Anestesiol. 2014;37(Supl. 1):299-304.

  31. Martínez Segura RT. TIVA-TCI, en pocas palabras. Rev Mex de Anestesiol. Farmacología en anestesia. 2013 [acceso: 16/05/2019];36(Supl. 1):262-66. Disponible en: https://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/rma/cma-2013/cmas131bh.pdf

  32. Rosa Díaz J, Navarrete Zuazo V. Diseño de una estrategia de infusión de midazolam ajustada al modelo farmacocinético de Greenblatt. Rev Cubana Anestesiol Rean. 2014 [acceso: 16/05/2019]; 13(3):220-30. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/pdf/scar/v13n3/ scar02314.pdf

  33. Crawford ME, Carl P, Andersen RS. Comparison between midazolam and thiopentone based balanced an aesthesia for daycare surgery. Br J Anaesth. 1984 [acceso: 16/05/2019];56:165-69. Disponible en: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/060d/ 0f6a71482315e8aec64d9a2c1e8cdec71a18.pdf

  34. Takayama A, Yamaguchi S, Ishikawa K, Shinozaki M, Kimura Y, Nagao M, et al. Recovery of psychomotor function after total intravenous anesthesia with remifentanil-propofol or fentanyl-propofol. J Anesth. 2012;26(1):34-8.

  35. Coskun D, Celebi H, Karaca G, Karabiyik L. Remifentanil versus fentanyl compared in a target-controlled infusion of Propofol anesthesia: quality of anesthesia and recovery profile. J Anesth. 2010;24(3):373-9.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com