2019, Number 3
<< Back Next >>
Revista Cubana de Cirugía 2019; 58 (3)
Fibrous tumor of the vaginal tunic
Sagué LJL, Proaño LS, Gómez LB, Díaz AMT
Language: Spanish
References: 17
Page: 1-8
PDF size: 295.91 Kb.
ABSTRACT
We present the case of a 21-year-old patient who reports a gradual increase in the scrotum of several months of evolution, without pain or other symptoms. In order to expose a benign paratesticular lesion classified as fibrous tumor of the vaginal tunic, a scrototomy was performed with biopsy, excision of the tumor and the testicle was preserved. The fibrous tissue was revealed with the intraoperative biopsy, later histopathology made the diagnosis of fibrous tumor. Orchiectomy can be avoided when we are faced with paratesticular lesions that are benign in most cases.
REFERENCES
López Aramburu MA, Viguri Díaz A, Peña Pérez P, Rosa Arias J, Saiz Camin M. Pseudotumor fibroso paratesticular. Arch. Esp. Urol. 2008 Oct [acceso 26/02/2018];61(8):932-6. Disponible en: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-06142008000800012&lng=es.
Rodríguez Collar TL. Tumores del cordón espermático y las túnicas escrotales. Rev Cub Med Mil. 2014 [acceso 25/02/2018];43(4):481-98. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0138-65572014000400008&lng=es.
Puttemans T1, Ingabire MI, Jorion JL, Draguet AP. Fibrous pseudotumor of the tunica vaginalis: contrast enhanced sonography with pathologic correlation. BR-BTR. 2014 Jul-Aug;97(4):259-61.
García Carriazo M, Bustos Gómez C, Domínguez Franjo E, Recio Gallardo S. A fibrous pseudotumor of the tunica vaginalis testis. A report of a new case and a review of the literature. Actas Urol Esp. 1999 Jan;23(1):68-70.
Zhang Z, Yang J, Li M, Cai W, Liu Q, Wang T, et al. Paratesticular fibrous pseudotumor: a report of five cases and literature review. Front Med. 2014 Dec;8(4):484-8.
Kern SQ, McMann LP. Bilateral fibrous pseudotumors of the tunica albuginea in a pediatric patient pseudotumor, previously named nodular fibrous periorchitis, is a very rare disease entity in the pediatric patient. This is the first reported case of bilateral synchronous fibrous pseudotumors in the testes of a pediatric patient. J Pediatr Urol. 2012 Feb;8(1):1-3.
Xambre L, Lages R, Cerqueira M, Silva V, Prisco R, Santos R, et al. Tumor fibroso solitario. Dos casos adicionales con implicaciones urológicas. Actas Urol Esp. 2003;27:832.
Parveen T, Fleischmann J, Petrelli M. Benign fibrous tumor of the tunica vaginalis testis. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 1992;116:277.
Goodwin WE. Multiple, benign, fibrous tumors of tunica vaginalis testis. J. Urol. 1946;56:438.
García Torrelles M, Beltrán Armada JR, Santolaya García I, Carrascosa Lloret V, Tarín Planes M. Tumor fibroso solitario de la túnica vaginal. Archivos Españoles de Urología. 2006;59(2):186-9.
Morgan AD. Inflammatory lesions simulating malignancy. Brit J Urol. 1964;36:95-102.
Puttemans T1, Ingabire MI, Jorion JL, Draguet AP. Fibrous pseudotumor of the tunica vaginalis: contrast enhanced sonography with pathologic correlation. BR-BTR. 2014;97(4):259-61.
lbey YO, Ozbek E, Polat EC, Simşek A, Somay A. Fibrous pseudotumor originating from tunica albuginea testis: a case report. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2010;82(3):178-80.
Diego Leonardo J, Patricia Ramos S, Verónica Millán R, Jorge Valenzuela T, Alejandra Zárate O. Tumor fibroso solitario. Estudio histopatológico e inmunohistoquímico de 18 casos de localización extrapleural. Revista latinoamericana Patología. 2010;48(2):73-81.
Silverio PC, Schoofs F, Iselin CE, Tille JC. Fourteen-year experience with the intraoperative frozen section examination of testicular lesion in a tertiary university center. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2015;19(3):99-102.
DeCoste RC, Carter MD, Merrimen J. Paratesticular fibrous pseudotumour: Intraoperative frozen section analysis can help prevent unnecessary orchiectomy. Can Urol Assoc J. 2015;9(10):731-3.
Gordetsky J, Findeis-Hosey J, Erturk E, Edward M. Role of frozensection analysis of testicular/paratesticular fibrous pseudotumours: a five-case experience Can Urol Assoc J. 2011;5(4):47–51.