medigraphic.com
ISSN 2174-0798 (Print)
Organo oficial de la Asociación Latinoamericana de Odontopediatría (ALOP)

2014, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Odotopediatr Latinoam 2014; 4 (1)

Retention and anti-cariogenic effect of sealants in primary molars. Controlled trial

Luengo-J JA, Mena MS, Carlos MLE, Toscano GI

Language: Spanish
References: 40
Page: 29-40
PDF size: 241.61 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective: Evaluate retention and anti-cariogenic effect of sealants in primary molars. Material and Methods: A controlled, single -blind, split-mouth design, 320 seconds primary molars caries free of 80 healthy children aged 3 and 5 years clinical trial was conducted. They were sealed with glass ionomer Ketac Molar® 3M second molars rights and resin sealant 3M® Clinpro left second molar. After twelve months the retention and caries incidence was evaluated. Data were processed with SPSS V-19 program. The Chi square test and Fisher test was used. Results: The control group scored 20% overall retention and experimental 13.3%. The Clinpro® sealant showed 28.6% loss, and sealer Ketac Molar® 32%. Within the experimental molar presents no lesions, whereas the control group there was a 16.3% incidence of caries, these differences were statistically significant (p‹0.05). Conclusion: The resin sealant retention was higher than the glass ionomer cement after 1 year. Retention of sealants on the mandibular teeth was higher than that of the maxillary teeth. There was no incidence of dental caries lesions in the group of molars sealed with glass ionomer loss, contrary to the group receiving resin-based sealant which 7 cases of the disease were presented.


REFERENCES

  1. . Irigoyen ME, Zepeda MA, Sánchez TL, Molina N. Prevalencia e incidencia de caries dental y hábitos de higiene bucal en un grupo de escolares del sur de la Ciudad de México: estudio de seguimiento longitudinal. Rev ADM 2001;52(3):98-104.

  2. . Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social. Diagnóstico de salud bucal 1990. Encuesta Epidemiológica de Salud Bucal. México: Subdirección General Médica, IMSS.1991

  3. . Secretaría de Salud. Programa Nacional de Salud 2001-2006. México: SS.2006.

  4. . Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social. Programa institucional de salud bucal 2001-2006. México: IMSS; Coordinación de Salud Pública.2006.

  5. . Ekstrand K. Improving Clinical Visual Detection-Potential for Caries Clinical Trials. J Dent Res.2004; C: p.67-71.

  6. . Law V, Seow WK, Townsend G. Factors influencing oral colonization of mutans streptococci in young children. Aust Dent J. 2007Jun;52(2):93-100.

  7. . Zambrano O, Lozano M, Arraiz N, Rivera L, Aguilera L, Chourio G. Tratamiento ultraconservador en la remoción de caries dental: evaluación microbiológica. Rev Venez Invest Odont IADR 2013;1(1):3-15.

  8. . American academy of pediatric dentistry. Guideline on Behavior Guidance for the Pediatric Restorative Dentistry. 2011;Vol 33, No. 6.

  9. . Aguilar FG, Drubi-Filho B, Casemiro LA, Watanabe M, Pires-de-Souza F. Retention and penetration of a conventional resin-based sealant and a photochromatic flowable composite resin placed on occlusal pits and fissures. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2007;25:169-73.

  10. . Welbury R, Raadal M, Lygidakis N. EAPD guidelines for the use of pit and fissure sealants. European journal of paediatric dentistry. 2004;3/p.179-184.

  11. . Oulis C, Berdouses E, Mamai Homata E, Polychoronopoulou A. Prevalence of sealants in relation to dental caries on the permanent molars of 12 and 15 year old Greek adolescents. A national Pathfinder survey. BMC Public Health. 2011;Vol11:100

  12. . Beauchamp J, Caufield P, Crall J, Donly K, Feigal R, Gooch B, Ismail A, Kohn W, Siegal M, Simonsen R. Evidence-Based Clinical Recommendations for the Use of Pit-and-Fissure Sealants: A Report of the American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008;139; 257-268.

  13. . Kavaloglu S, Sandalli N. Compressive Strength, Surface Roughness, Fluoride Release and Recharge of FourNew Fluoride-releasing Fissure Sealants. Dental Materials Journal. 2007;26(3): 335-341.

  14. . Ahovuo-Saloranta, Hiiri A, Nordbland A, Makela M, Worthington HV. Pit and fissure sealants for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth of children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010,8(4):CD001830.

  15. . Azarpazhooh A, Main PA. Pit and fissure sealants in the prevention of dental caries in children and adolescents: a systematic review. J Can Dent Assoc.2008 Mar;74(2):171-7.

  16. . Simonsen RJ. Pit and Fissure sealant: review of literature. Pediatric Dent.2002 Sep-Oct;24(5):393-414.

  17. . Salar DV., García-Godoy F., Flaitz CM., Hicks MJ. Potential inhibition of demineralization in vitro by fluoride-releasing sealants. J Am Dent Assoc.2007 Apr;138(4):502-6.

  18. . Trairatvorakul C., Kladkaew S., Songsiripradabboon S. Active Management of Incipient Caries and Choice of Materials. J Dent Res.2008 Mar;87(3):228-232.

  19. . Kantovitz KR., Pascon FM., Correr GM., Borges AF., Uchoa MN., Puppin-Rontani RM. Inhibition of mineral loss at the enamel/sealant interface of fissures sealed with fluorideand non-fluoride containing dental materials in vitro. Acta Odontol Scand.2006 Nov;64(6):376-83.

  20. . Beiruti N., Frencken JE., van't Hof MA., Taifour D., van Palenstein Helderman WH. Caries-preventive effect of a onetime application of composite resin and glass ionomer sealants after 5 years. Caries Res.2006;40(1):52-9.

  21. . Beiruti N., Frencken JE., van 't Hof MA., van Palenstein Helderman WH. Caries-preventive effect of resin-based and glass ionomer sealants over time: a systematic review. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol.2006 Dec; 34(6):403-9.

  22. . International Caries Detection & Assessment System Coordinating Committee. The International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS II at June 2005). 2005. Disponible en: www.icdas.org.

  23. . Declaración de Helsinki: principios éticos para la investigación médica sobre sujetos humanos. Análisis de la 5ª Reforma, aprobada por la Asamblea General, de la Asociación Médica Mundial en octubre del año 2000, en Edimburgo, Respecto del texto aprobado en Somerset West (Sudáfrica) en octubre de 1996. Acta Bioética.2000;VI,nº 2

  24. . García-Godoy F. Retention of a light-cured fissure sealant (Helioseal) in a tropical environment after 12 months. Clin Prev Dent.1986;8:11-3.

  25. . Luengo J, Zambrano O, Rivera L. Sellado de lesiones de caries dental no cavitadas: Ensayo clínico aleatorio controlado. Rev. odontopediatr. Latinoam.2013;Vol.3,#2,p.45-57.

  26. . Aranda M, Garcia-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of the retention and wear of a ligth-cured pit and fissure glass ionomer sealant. J Clin Pediatr Dent.1995;19:273-7.

  27. . Pope B, Garcia-Godoy F, Summitt J, Chan D. Effectiveness of oclusal fissure cleansing methods and selant micromorphology. ASDC J Dent Child.1996;63:175-80.

  28. . Mertz-Fairhurst EJ, Della-Giustina VE, Brooks JE, Williams JE, Fairhurst CW. A comparative study of two pit and fissure sealants: Results after 4 1/2years in Augusta, Ga. J Am Dent Assoc.1981;103:235-8.

  29. . Karlzen G, van Dijken J. A three year follow up of glass ionomer cement and resin fissure sealants. ASDC J Dent Child.1995;62:108-10.

  30. . Raadal M, Utkilen A, Nilsen O. Fissure sealing with a ligth-cured resin reinforced glass-ionomer cement (vitrebond) compared with a resin sealant. Int J Pediatr Dent.1995;6:235-9.

  31. . Albani F., Ballesio I., Campanella V., Marzo G. Pit and fissure sealants: Results at five and 10 years. Eur J Paediatr Dent.2005;6:61-5.

  32. . Muller-Bolla M., Lupi-Pégurier L., Tardieu C., Velly AM., Antomarchi C. Retention of resin-based pit and fissure sealants: A systematic review. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol.2006 Oct;34(5):321-36.

  33. . Turksel C, Colak h. Rural dentistry: Is it an imagination or obligation in community dental health education?. Niger Med J. 2012 Jan-Mar;53(1):1-8.ural dentistry: Is it an imagination or obligation in community dental health education?ural dentistry: Is it an imagination or obligation in community dental health education?ural dentistry: Is it an imagination or obligation in community dental health education?

  34. . Yip HK, Smales RJ. Glass ionomer cements used as fissure sealants with the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach: Review of literature. Int Dent J.2002;52:67-70.

  35. . Ripa LW. Occlusal sealants: Rationale and review of clinical trials. Int Dent J 1980;30:127-39.

  36. . Messer LB, Calache H, Morgan MV. The retention of pit and fissure sealants placed in primary school children by Dental Health Services, Victoria. Aust Dent J.1997;42:233-9.

  37. . Poulsen S, Beiruti N, Sadat N. A comparison of retention and the effect on caries of fissure sealing with a glass-ionomer and a resin-based sealant. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol.2001;29: 298-301.

  38. . Mejare I, Mjór IA. Glass ionomer and resin-based fissure sealants: A clinical study. Scand J Dent Res.1990;98:345-50.

  39. . Wilson AD, McLean JW. Glass-Ionomer Cement. Quintessence Publishing Co.1988.

  40. . Valencia J. Ionómeros de vidrio remineralizantes. Una alternativa de tratamiento preventivo o terapéutico. Rev. ADM. 2011; 68(5):258-265.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com