2020, Number 1
Sociocultural approach to the feminine genital mutilation
Language: Spanish
References: 25
Page: 206-225
PDF size: 299.42 Kb.
ABSTRACT
The feminine genital mutilation is registered among the harmful traditional practices recognized as form of violence against the women and the girls. Complex topic, delicate and politicized, difficult to understand through normative definitions, classifications and geographical delimitation. Its ignorance, on the part of the professionals of the health, can contribute to an inadequate handling of the patients, as part of their integral attention. The work takes as an objective to argue on sociocultural aspects of the Feminine Genital Mutilation, essential for its integral handling for the health professional. The approach, called “five P” is recommended: predominance, prevention, protection, pursuit and provision of services. Moreover, the reproach attitudes must be avoided or victimization towards the patient, expression of a eurocentral and paternalistic look towards the different, unexpected or unknown; as well as not to promote the medicalization of the practice.REFERENCES
World Health Organization (WHO). WHO guidelines on the management of health complications from female genital mutilation. Ginebra: World Health Organization [Internet]. 2016.1-7 [citado 21/10/2018]. Available from: https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/topics/fgm/management-health-complicationsfgm/ en/
Pastor Bravo MD, Almansa Martínez P. La mutilación genital femenina desde la perspectiva de las mujeres afectadas. Abordaje desde Enfermería. España. Digitum: Biblioteca universitaria [Internet]. 2016[citado 29/1/2020].Disponible en: https://digitum.um.es/xmlui/simplesearch?query=mutilaci%C3%B3n+genital+femeni na
Modrek S, Sieverding M. Mother, Daughter, Doctor: Medical Professionals and Mothers’ Decision Making About Female Genital Cutting in Egypt. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health [Internet]. 2016 [cited 29/1/2020]; 42(2). Available from: http://about.jstor.org/terms/10.1363/42e1116
Johnsdotter S, Ruth M, Mestre I. Female Genital Mutilation in Europe: An analysis of court cases, Luxemburgo: Dirección General de Justicia de la Comisión Europea [Internet]. 2015[citado 29/1/2020]. Disponible en: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/293301208_Female_Genital_Mutilation_in _Europe_An_Analysis_of_Court_Cases
Baer M, Brysk A. New Rights for Private Wrongs: Female Genital Mutilation and Global Framing Dialogues. En: The International Struggle for New Human Rights. Filadelfia: University of Pennsylvania Press [Internet]. 2009[cited 29/1/2020]. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/293308804_New_rights_for_private_wron gs_Female_genital_mutilation_and_global_framing_dialogues
INNOCENTI Centro de Investigación de UNICEF, Cambiar una convención social perjudicial: la ablación o mutilación genital femenina, Innocenti Digest. UNICEF, Florencia [Internet]. 2006 [citado 20/9/2019]. Disponible en: https://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/403-cambiar-una-convenci%C3%B3n-socialperjudicial- la-ablaci%C3%B3n-o-mutilaci%C3%B3n-genital-femenina.html
Instituto Europeo de la Igualdad de Género (IEIG). Female genital mutilation in the European Union and Croatia. Luxemburgo: Oficina de Publicaciones de la Unión Europea [Internet].2003 [citado 20/9/2019]. Disponible en: https://eige.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/eige-report-fgm-in-the-eu-andcroatia. pdf
Ragnhild E, Johansen P. Undoing female genital cutting: perceptions and experiences of infibulation, defibulation and virginity among Somali and Sudanese migrants in Norway. Culture, HealtH & Sexuality [Internet]. 2017 [cited 29/1/2020]; 19 (4). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2016.1239838.
Fondo de Población de las Naciones Unidas Naciones (oficina de Colombia) (FNUAP-Colombia). Project Embera-wera: An experience of cultural change to eradicate female genital mutilation in Colombia – Latin America [Internet]. 2011 [citado 26/10/2018]. Disponible en: https://colombia.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pubpdf/ proyectoembera%20%281%29%20%281%29.pdf
Consejo de Europa y Amnistía Internacional. The Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence: A tool to end female genital mutilation, Estrasburgo: Consejo de Europa y Amnistía Internacional [Internet].2014 [citado 21/9/2019]; 1(58). Disponible en:https://www.endfgm.eu/content/documents/studies/Istanbul-Convention-FGMguide. pdf
Johansen R, Elise B, Nafissatou J, et al. What Works and What Does Not: A Discussion of Popular Approaches for the Abandonment of Female Genital Mutilation. Obstetrics and Gynecology International [Internet]. 2013 [cited 21/9/ 2019]; 1(11). Available from: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/ogi/2013/348248/
Leye E, Jessika D, García J, Johnsdotter S, et al. An analysis of the implementation of laws with regard to female genital mutilation in Europe. Crime, Law and Social Change [Internet]. 2007 [cited 21/9/ 2019]; 47(1). Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/225674416_An_analysis_of_the_impleme ntation_of_laws_with_regard_to_female_genital_mutilation_in_Europe
Johnsdotter S. Projected Cultural Histories of the Cutting of Female Genitalia: A poor reflection as in a mirror. History and Anthropology [Internet]. 2012 [cited 21/9/ 2019]; 23(1). Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263677616_Projected_Cultural_Histories_ of_the_Cutting_of_Female_Genitalia_A_Poor_Reflection_as_in_a_Mirror