medigraphic.com
ISSN 1684-1824 (Electronic)

2019, Number 6

Next >>

Rev Méd Electrón 2019; 41 (6)

Effectiveness of Ambu® Aura40™ laryngeal mask for general anesthetic in pediatric orthopedic surgery

González PRI, Ramos DY, García PC, González NH, Rodríguez FM, Chacón RJA

Language: Spanish
References: 21
Page:
PDF size: 269.66 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: laryngeal mask are supra glottal devices widely used in anesthetics for approaching and maintaining the airway. One of them, the Ambu® Aura40™, has a design allowing to adjust to the surroundings of hypo-pharynx with its lumen directed to the pharyngeal opening. It has demonstrated to be adequate for surgical procedures when there is no need of endotracheal intubation.
Objective: to determine the effectiveness of that laryngeal mask for general anesthetic in pediatric orthopedic surgery.
Materials and methods: a cross-sectional, prospective, descriptive study was carried out in 135 patients who underwent elective surgical intervention in the Pediatric Hospital "Eliseo Noel Caamaño", of Matanzas, in the period January 2015- June 2017. The number of attempts and the time needed to insert laryngeal mask, the necessity of changing it for an endotracheal tube, and complications related to its usage were taking into account.
Results: Ambu® Aura40™ laryngeal mask was effective in most patients, due to it allowed to perform the surgery without need of changing it for an endotracheal tube, and the low appearance of complications related to its use.
Conclusions: Ambu® Aura40™ laryngeal mask was effective because it was inserted correctly at the first attempt, in a time less than 20 seconds. Only a minority needed to replace it by endotracheal tube, and the appearance of complications related to its use were low.


REFERENCES

  1. Cordero Escobar I. La vía área y su abordaje. En: Dávila CV, Gómez BC, Álvarez BM, et al. Anestesiología clínica[Internet]. La Habana: Editorial Ciencias Médicas[citado 18/02/19]; 2014.P. 87-97. Disponible en: http://www.bvscuba.sld.cu/resultados-debusqueda/? q=Anestesiolog%C3%ADa+cl%C3%ADnica

  2. Rosenberg M, Phero J, Becker D. Essentials of Airway Management, Oxygenation, and Ventilation: Part 2: Advanced Airway Devices: Supraglottic Airways. Anesth Prog. 2014 Fall;61(3):113-8. Citado en PubMed; PMID: 25191986.

  3. González del Pino Ruz I, López Torres O, García Cárdenas AJ, et al. Máscara laríngea en la emergencia pediátrica. Presentación de un caso. Rev Méd Electrón [Internet]. 2011[citado 18/02/19]; 33 (1). Disponible en: http://www.revmatanzas.sld.cu/revista%20medica/ano%202011/vol1%202011/tema1 4.htm

  4. Peker G1, Takmaz SA1, Baltacı B. Comparison of Four Different Supraglottic Airway Devices in Terms of Efficacy, Intra-ocular Pressure and Haemodynamic Parameters in Children Undergoing Ophthalmic Surgery. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2015 Oct;43(5):304-12. Citado en PubMed; PMID: 27366519.

  5. Dwivedi MB, Nagrale M, Dwivedi S, et al. What happens to the hemodynamic responses for laryngeal mask airway insertion when we supplement propofol with butorphanol or fentanyl for induction of anesthesia: A comparative assessment and critical review. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2016 Jan-Mar; 6(1): 40–44. Citado en PubMed; PMID: 27051621.

  6. Karišik M. Simple, timely, safely? Laryngeal mask and pediatric airway. Acta Clin Croat. 2016 Mar;55 Suppl 1:55-61. Citado en PubMed; PMID: 27276773.

  7. Rasulo F, Zugni N, Piva S, et.al. Influence of supraglottic airway device placement on cerebral hemodynamics. Minerva Anestesiol. 2016 Aug;82(8):850-7. Citado en PubMed; PMID: 27607186.

  8. Martínez Hurtado E, Sánchez Merchante M. Nuevas mascarillas laríngeas, la tercera generación [Internet].España: Anestesiar.org; 2015[citado 18/02/19]. Disponible en http://anestesiar.org/2014/nuevas-mascarillas-laringeas-la-3a-generacion/

  9. Nuestra Familia de Mascarillas Laríngeas [Internet]. Dinamarca: Aura de Ambu; 2014[citado 18/02/19]. Disponible en www.ambu.es

  10. Romero-Paz L, Granados-Vergara L. Incidencia de laringoespasmo, reducción en saturación de oxígeno y tos durante el despertar de anestesia general en niños. Rev cienc biomed[Internet]. 2013[citado 18/02/19]; 4(1)75-85. Disponible en: http://www.imbiomed.com.mx/1/1/articulos.php?method=showDetail&id_articulo= 94212&id_seccion=3889&id_ejemplar=9212&id_revista=23

  11. Dones F, Foresta G, Russotto V. Update on perioperative management of the child with asthma. Pediatric Reports. 2012; 4(2):e19: 70-6. Citado en PubMed; PMID: 22802997.

  12. Alzahem AM, Aqil M, Alzahrani TA, et al. Ambu AuraOnce versus i-gel laryngeal mask airway in infants and children undergoing surgical procedures. Saudi Med J. 2017 May; 38(5): 482–90. Citado en PubMed; PMID: 28439597.

  13. Williams DL, Zeng JM, Alexander KD, et al. Randomised Comparison of the AMBU AuraOnce Laryngeal Mask and the LMA Unique Laryngeal Mask Airway in Spontaneously Breathing Adults. Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2012; 2012: 405812. Citado en PubMed; PMID: 22505884.

  14. Gu Z, Jin Q, Liu J, et al. Observation of ventilation effects of I-gel™, Supreme™ and Ambu AuraOnce™ with respiratory dynamics monitoring in small children. J Clin Monit Comput. 2017 Oct;31(5):1035-1041. . Citado en PubMed; PMID: 27492428.

  15. Siddharam J, Liyakhath A, Manjunath MA. prospective randomized study comparing the , the AMBU Aura40 Laryngeal Mask TM and the I-GelTM using fiberoptic bronchoscope in spontaneously breathing anesthetized patients. IAIM[Internet]. 2015 [citado 18/02/19]; 2(7): 105-15. Disponible en: http://oaji.net/articles/2015/1398- 1437130887.pdf

  16. Genzwuerker H, Aniset L, Jandewerth O, et al. Preliminary Experience with a New Reusable Laryngeal Mask: The Ambu Aura40. Anesthesiology[internet]. 2006[citado 18/02/19]; 105: A524. Disponible en: https://www.ambu.com/clinical-studies/ambuaura- 40

  17. Tekin B, Hatipoglu Z, Türktan M, et al. Comparing the Laryngeal Mask Airway, Cobra Perilaryngeal Airway and Face Mask in Children Airway Management. . Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2016 Apr;44(2):81-5. Citado en PubMed; PMID: 27366563.

  18. Jain S, Khan R, Ahmed S, et al. Comparison of classic laryngeal mask airway with Ambu laryngeal mask for tracheal tube exchange: A prospective randomized controlled study. Indian J Anaesth. 2013 May;57(3):259-64. Citado en PubMed; PMID: 23983284.

  19. Venugopal A, Jacob RM, Koshy RC. A randomized control study comparing the pharyngolaryngeal morbidity of laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal tube. Anesth Essays Res. 2016 May-Aug; 10(2): 189–94. Citado en PubMed; PMID: 27212745.

  20. Wong D, Tam A, Mehta V, t al. New supraglottic airway with built-in pressure indicator decreases postoperative pharyngolaryngeal symptoms: a randomized controlled trial. Can J Anesth. 2013; 60(12):1197–203. Citado en PubMed; PMID: 24097301.

  21. Gavel G, Walker R. Laryngospasm in anaesthesia. Educación Continua en Anestesia Critical Care & Pain[Internat]. 2014[citado 18/02/19]; 14 (2):47-51.Disponible en: https://academic.oup.com/bjaed/article/14/2/47/271333




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com