Picrin-Dimont JD, Vega-González I, Delgado-López N, Correoso-Bravo MS

Language: Spanish
References: 14
Page: 46-54
PDF size: 411.40 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: in assessing the difficulty of performing conventional laryngoscopy, the necessary integration of essential clinical aspects related to respiratory control is not enhanced. Objective: to validate a prediction model of an anatomically difficult laryngoscopy in the patient that requires orotracheal intubation. Method: An analytical study was carried out in a population of 17,966 patients in need of direct laryngoscopy for an orotracheal intubation for surgical purposes at the General Teaching Hospital "Dr. Agostinho Neto” from Guantanamo between 2015 and 2018. A sample of 17,068 patients was determined by randomized sampling. The following variables were studied: peripheral stigma for difficult laryngoscopy, difficult laryngoscopy after anesthetic induction, laryngoscopic evaluation according to Cormack-Lehane, diagnostic value of the predictive evaluation model for laryngoscopy. Results: the high degrees in the classification of predictive clinical aspects and the coexistence with the morphological alteration of the epiglottis were the markers most associated with the probability of anatomically difficult laryngoscopy. With the integration of four essential clinical aspects, the degree of probable difficulty in visualizing the vocal cords was identified. Conclusions: a model was designed that allowed the prediction of an anatomically difficult laryngoscopy, whose validation certified its feasibility to apply it in medical practice.

REFERENCES

1. Cobo García B, Mariscal Flores ML, Martínez Hurtado ED, Paz Martín D, Andueza Artal A, Martínez López A, et al. Valoración y predicción de la Vía Aérea Difícil. En: Manual de manejo de la vía aérea difícil [en línea]. Madrid: ELSEVIER; 2017. p. 59-76. [citado 23 May 2019]. Disponible en: https://shop.anestesiar.org/tienda/manual-vad-papel/

2. Cordero Escobar MI. Vía respiratoria anatómicamente difícil. Anestesiología. Criterios y tendencias actuales. La Habana: Editorial Ciencias Médicas; 2013.

3. Martinez-Hurtado E, Sanchez-Merchante M, Ripolles-Melchor J. Difficult Airway management with a king vision video laryngoscope in an anticipated patient and an unexpected patient: two scenarios, one device. Int Med MedInv J [en línea]. 2018 [citado 27 May 2019]; 3(1):40-42. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24200/imminv.v3i1.112

4. Karakus O, Cengiz K, Faik Emre U, Ersin K, Yasemin Burcu U. Valor predictivo de los test preoperatorios para estimar la intubación difícil en pacientes sometidos a la laringoscopia directa para la cirugía de oído, nariz y garganta. Rev Bras Anestesiol [en línea]. 2015 [citado 1 Mar 2019]; 65(2):85-91. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjanes.2014.05.004 5. Kheterpal S, Healy D, Aziz MF. Incidence, predictors, and outcome of difficult mask ventilation combined with difficult laryngoscopy: a report from the multicenter perioperative outcomes group. Anesthesiology [en línea]. 2013 [citado 1 Mar 2019]; 119:1360-9. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24071617

5. Henderson JM. Gaze control as prediction. Trends Cogn Sci [en línea]. 2017 [citado 1 Mar 2019]; 21(1):15-23. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.11.003

6. Frerk C, et al. Difficult Airway Society intubation guidelines working group. Difficult Airway Society 2015 guidelines for management of unanticipated difficult intubation in adults. Brit J Anaest [en línea]. 2015 [citado 1 Mar 2019]; 115(6):827-48. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bja/aev371

7. Nørskov AK, Rosenstock CV, Wetterslev J, Astrup G, Afshari A, Lundstrøm LH. Diagnostica ccuracy of anaesthesiologists’ prediction of difficult airway management in daily clinical practice: a cohort study of 188 064 patients registered in the Danish Anaesthesia Data base. Anaesthesia [en línea]. 2015 [citado 1 Mar 2019]; 70:272–81 Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25511370

8. Ross W, Ellard L. Rapid secuence inductiom. Update Anaesth Education for Anaesthetists worldwide [en línea] 2017 [citado 17 May 2019]; 32:7-12. Disponible en: https://www.wfsahq.org/images/UiA_volume_32_final_web_2.pdf

9. Picrin Dimot JD, Picrin Dimot D, Picrin Minot J. The morphometric approach in the predictive diagnosis of the anatomically difficult airway. Rev Cubana Anestesiol Rean [en línea]. 2016 [citado 1 Jul 2019] 15(2):[aprox. 13 p.]. Disponible en: http://bvs.sld.cu/revistas/scar/vol15_2_16/scar01216.htm

10. Hayashida K, Matsumoto S, Kitano M, Sasaki J. Predictive value of quick surgical airway assessment for trauma (qSAT) score for identifying trauma patients requiring surgical airway in emergency room. Emer Med [en línea]. 2018; 18:48 [citado 28 May 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-018-0203-4

11. Cormack-Lehane. Difficult tracheal intubation in obstetrics. Anaesthesia [en línea]. [citado 1 Mar 2019]; 39:1105-111. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6507827

12. Rosenberg MB, Phero JC, Becker DE. Essentials of Airway Management, Oxygenation, and Ventilation: Part 2: Advanced Airway Devices: Supraglottic Airways. Anesth Prog [en línea]. 2014 [citado 1 Mar 2019]; 61(3):113-118. DOI: 10.2344/0003-3006-61.3.113

13. Mac G, Palmer J, Pandit JJ. AAGA during induction of anaesthesia and transfer intotheatre. In: Pandit JJ, Cook TM. Nacional Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland [en línea]. 5aed. London: Accidental Awareness during General Anaesthesia in the United Kingdom and Ireland; 2014 [citado 1 Mar 2019]. p. 63-76. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25204697

14. Mushambi MC, Kinsella SM, Popat M. Obstetric Anaesthetists’ Association and Difficult Airway Society guide lines for the management of difficult and failed tracheal intubation in obstetrics. Anaesthesia [en línea]. 2015 [citado 29 May 2019]; 70:1286-1306. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26449292