medigraphic.com
Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública

2020, Number 5

<< Back Next >>

salud publica mex 2020; 62 (5)

Massive online course “Sexual and reproductive health”: changes in knowledge, desertion, disapproval and satisfaction

De Castro F, Rodríguez-Hernández JA, Hubert-López C, Sánchez-Pájaro A, Rosas-Magallanes C, Villalobos A, Barrientos-Gutiérrez T

Language: Spanish
References: 36
Page: 559-568
PDF size: 375.46 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective. To present global results of the dropout and failure and satisfaction of the Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) users, as well as changes in knowledge and practices of personnel registered in “Sexual and Reproductive Health and Prevention of adolescent pregnancy”. Materials and methods. Using 45 549 records, we adjust logistic regression models to find associations between variables of dropout and failure. Results. 57.8% of people completed the course and 15.1% failure. Logistic models show that age and position are associated with both dropout and failure. Conclusions. The MOOC is useful to improve knowledge and skills of health personnel. It is necessary to expand the coverage to professionals who deal with adolescent population, in order to improve sexual and reproductive health and prevent teenage pregnancies.


REFERENCES

  1. Ganchimeg T, Ota E, Morisaki N, Laopaiboon M, Lumbiganon P, Zhang J, et al. Pregnancy and childbirth outcomes among adolescent mothers: a World Health Organization multicountry study. BJOG. 2014;121(suppl1): 40-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12630

  2. Ruedinger E, Cox JE. Adolescent childbearing: consequences and interventions. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2012;24(4):446-52. https://doi. org/10.1111/1471-0528.12630

  3. Sedgh G, Finer LB, Bankole A, Eilers MA, Singh S. Adolescent pregnancy, birth, and abortion rates across countries: levels and recent trends. J Adolesc Heal. 2015;56(2):223-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth. 2014.09.007

  4. World Health Organization. WHO Guidelines for preventing early pregnancy and poor reproductive outcomes in adolescents in developing countries. Ginebra: WHO, 2011:1-195.

  5. United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund. UNICEF Annual Report 2017 Mexico [Internet]. México: UNICEF, 2017 [citado septiembre 20, 2018]. Disponible en: https://www.unicef.org/about/annualreport/ files/Mexico_2017_COAR.pdf

  6. Banco Mundial. Tasa de fertilidad en adolescentes (nacimientos por cada 1 000 mujeres entre 15 y 19 años de edad) - OECD members, Mexico [Internet]. Washington: Banco Mundial, 2016 [citado diciembre 6, 2018]. Disponible en: https://datos.bancomundial.org/indicador/SP.ADO. TFRT?end=2016&locations=OE-MX&start=1960&view=chart

  7. Instituto Nacional de las Mujeres. Madres adolescentes [Internet]. Ciudad de México: Inmujeres, 2019 [citado abril 11, 2020]. Disponible en: http:// estadistica.inmujeres.gob.mx/formas/tarjetas/Madres_adolescentes.pdf

  8. Juarez F, Palma JL, Singh S, Bankole A. Las necesidades de salud sexual y reproductiva de las adolescentes en México: retos y oportunidades. Nueva York: Guttmacher Institute, 2010.

  9. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. Encuesta Nacional de la Dinámica Demográfica (ENADID) 2018 [Internet]. México: Inegi, 2018 [citado septiembre 10, 2019]. Disponible en: https://www.inegi.org.mx/ programas/enadid/2018/

  10. Villalobos A, Allen-Leigh B, Salazar-Alberto J, De Castro F, Barrientos- Gutiérrez T, Leyva-López A, Rojas-Martínez R. Quality of reproductive healthcare for adolescents: A nationally representative survey of providers in Mexico. PLoS One. 2017;12(3):1-13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0173342

  11. Saavedra-Avendano B, Andrade-Romo Z, Rodriguez MI, Darney BG. Adolescents and long-acting reversible contraception: lessons from Mexico. Matern Child Health J. 2017;21(9):1724-33. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10995-016-2013-1

  12. Allen B. Atención a la salud sexual y reproductiva de las y los adolescentes. En: Valdivia Ibarra R, Lombana Ruiz J, Lazcano E, Rojas R, eds. Monitoreo de la atención a las mujeres en servicios del sector salud 2012. Cuernavaca: INSP/Inmujeres, 2013:133-51.

  13. Carrol C, Booth A, Papaioannou D, Sutton A, Wong R. UK health-care professionals´ experience of on-line learning techniques: A systematic review of qualitative data. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2009;29(4):235-41. https://doi.org/10.1002/chp.20041

  14. Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta ZA, Cohen J, Crisp N, Evans T, et al. Health professionals for a new century: Transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. Lancet. 2010;376(9756):1923- 58. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61854-5

  15. Tobon S. El enfoque complejo de las competencias y el diseño curricular por ciclos propedéuticos. Acción Pedagógica. 2007;16(1):14-28 Disponible en: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/2968540.pdf

  16. González CS, Collazos CA, García R. Desafío en el diseño de MOOCs: incorporación de aspectos para la colaboración y la gamificación. Rev Educ a Distancia. 2016;7(48):1-23. https://doi.org/10.6018/red/48/7

  17. Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública. Evaluación del MOOC: Salud sexual y reproductiva y prevención del embarazo en adolescentes [Internet]. Ciudad de México: INSP/Inmujeres, 2018 [citado noviembre 12, 2018]. Disponible en: http://cedoc.inmujeres.gob.mx/documentos_download/101315.pdf

  18. Long JS, Freese J. Regression models for categorical dependent variables using STATA. 3rd ed. College Station: STATA Press, 2014.

  19. Rivard R. Measuring the MOOC dropout rate [Internet]. Inside Higher Ed. 2013 [citado marzo 17, 2018]. Disponible en: https://www.insidehighered. com/news/2013/03/08/researchers-explore-who-taking-moocs-andwhy- so-many-drop-out

  20. Dicheva D, Dichev C, Agre G, Angelova G. Gamification in education: A systematic mapping study. Educ Technol Soc. 2015;18(3):75-88 [citado mayo 7, 2018]. Disponible en: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1xT2Aryx9rZ rdFeqmCpjJNaeLtgLuQba4/view

  21. Liyanagunawardena TR, Williams SA. Massive open online courses on health and medicine: Review. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(8):1-20 [citado febrero 5, 2018]. Disponible en: https://www.jmir.org/2014/8/e191/

  22. Morris N, Hotchkiss S, Swinnerton B. Can demographic information predict MOOC learner outcomes? En: Proceedings of the European stakeholders summit on experience and best practices in and Around MOOCs (EMOOCs2015). Graz: Books on Demand GmbH, Norderstedt, 2015:199-207 [citado julio 20, 2018]. Disponible en: https://www.researchgate. net/publication/278392770_Can_demographic_information_predict_ MOOC_learner_outcomes

  23. Shrader S, Wu M, Owens-Nicholson D, Santa Ana K. Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs): Participant activity, demographics, and satisfaction. Online Learn. 2016;20(2):199-216. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj. v20i2.596

  24. Henderikx M, Kreijns K, Castaño-Muñoz J, Kalz M. Factors influencing the pursuit of personal learning goals in MOOCs. Distance Educ. 2019;40(2):187-204. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2019.1600364

  25. Magaña-Valladares L, Rosas-Magallanes C, Montoya-Rodríguez A, Calvillo-Jacobo G, Alpuche-Arande CM, García-Saisó S. A MOOC as an immediate strategy to train health personnel in the cholera outbreak in Mexico. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18(1):1-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909- 018-1215-1

  26. Poy R, Gonzales-Aguilar A. Factores de éxito de los MOOC: Algunas consideraciones críticas. RISTI-Rev Ibérica Sist y Tecnol Inf. 2014;(E1):105- 18 [citado junio 29, 2019]. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.mec.pt/scielo. php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-98952014000100009

  27. Kizilcec RF, Piech C, Schneider E. Deconstructing disengagement: Analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses. En: Suthers D, Verbert K, Duval E, Ochoa X, eds. Proceedings of the LAK ’13: Third Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge [Internet]. Leuven: Association for Computing Machinery, 2013:170-9. https://doi. org/10.1145/2460296.2460330

  28. Khalil H, Ebner M. MOOCs completion rates and possible methods to improve retention-A literature review. En: Herrington J, Viteli J, Leikomaa M (eds.) Procedings of the EdMedia 2014: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology [Internet]. Tampere: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, 2014:1305-13 [citado junio 27, 2018]. Disponible en: https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/147656/

  29. Khalil H, Ebner M. “How satisfied are you with your MOOC?”–A research study about interaction in huge online courses. En: Herrington J, Cuoros A, Irvine V, eds. Proceedings of EdMedia 2013-World Conference on Educational Media and Technology [Internet]. Victoria: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, 2013:830-9 [citado octubre 20, 2018]. Disponible en: https://www.learntechlib.org/p/112057/

  30. Hone KS, El Said GR. Exploring the factors affecting MOOC retention: A survey study. Comput Educ. 2016;98(1):157-68. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.016

  31. Adamopoulus P. What makes a great MOOC? An interdisciplinary analysis of student retention in online courses. En: Baskervile R, Chau M, eds. Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS [Internet]. Milan: AIS, 2013:1-21 [citado abril 16, 2018]. Disponible en: https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2013/proceedings/Breakthrough- Ideas/13/

  32. Rai L, Chunrao D. Influencing factors of success and failure in MOOC and general analysis of learner behavior. Int J Inf Educ Technol. 2016;6(4):262-8. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJIET.2016.V6.697

  33. López-García JC. La taxonomía de Bloom y sus actualizaciones [internet]. Cali, Colombia: Eduteka/Universidad ICESI, 2014 [citado diciembre 20, 2019]. Disponible en: http://eduteka.icesi.edu.co/articulos/Taxonomia- BloomCuadro

  34. Saltzman GM. The Economics of MOOCs. En: Lee JB, Saltzman GM, Allen HL, Zumeta W, Dougherty KA, Rhoades G, et al, eds. The NEA 2014 Almanac of Higher Education. Washington DC: National Education Association, 2014:19-29.

  35. Baker R, Passmore D. Value and pricing of MOOCs. Educ Sci. 2016;6(2):1-4. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci6020014

  36. Hollands FM, Tirthali D. Resource requirements and costs of developing and delivering MOOCs. Int Rev Res Open Distance Learn. 2014;15(5):113-33. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i5.1901




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com