2004, Number 3
<< Back Next >>
Acta Ortop Mex 2004; 18 (3)
Endoscopic release of the carpal tunnel. Preliminary report
Valdés MML, Torres RF, Vega HR, Rojas MHA, Longo MM
Language: Spanish
References: 18
Page: 115-118
PDF size: 774.52 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Methods. We studied 22 patients with diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome, a
total of 27 surgeries. All patients was made a full clinical history included positive
signs Tinel, Phalen, and electromiographic study for confirmation. All the patients
were treated with endoscopic release. The patients were followed up from 6 to 18
months, and the evaluation was made for an external doctor.
Results. The dominant
hand was right 18 (66.6%) 19 women and 3 men; 15 (55.5%) patients were workers,
and 12 (44.4%) home workers, just two patients had a previous illness like diabetes
mellitus and hypothyroidism. The electromyographic preoperative study showed 20
(74%) neuropraxies y 7 (25.9%) axonotmesis, and the final control showed 12 (60%)
normal, just one axonotmesis was changed to neuropraxie, and other axonotmesis was
reported normal. The satisfaction of the patients was valorated with an analogous
scale and the results: 3 (11.1%) surgeries were excellent, 18 (66.6%) with good
results, 3 (11.1%) regular and 3 (11.1%) with poor results.
Conclusion. We observed
the endoscopic release is a good technique, is effective, reduces the morbility. And
it reduces the complications of open surgery and the satisfaction of the patients is
good.
REFERENCES
Agee JM, Mc Carroll HR Jr, Tortosa RD, Berry DA, Szabo RM, Peimer CA: Endoscopic release of the carpal tunnel: a randomized prospective multicenter study. J Hand Surg (Am) 1992; 17(6): 987-995.
Atroshi I, Johnsson R, Ornstein E: Endoscopic carpal tunnel release: prospective assessment of 225 consecutive cases. J Hand Surg (Br) 1997; 22(1): 42-47.
Brown MG, Keyser B, Rothenberg ES: Endoscopic tunnel release. J Hand Surg (Am) 1992; 17(6): 1009-1011.
Chow JC: Endoscopic release of the carpal ligament: a new technique for carpal tunnel syndrome. Arthoscopy 1989; 5(1): 19-24.
Chow JC: The Chow technique of endoscopic release of the carpal ligament for carpal tunnel syndrome: four years of clinical results. Arthroscopy 1993; 9(3): 301-314.
Chow JC: Endoscopic release of the carpal ligament for carpal tunnel syndrome: long-term results using the Chow technique. Arthroscopy 1999; 15(4): 417-421.
Erdmann MW: Endoscopic carpal tunnel decompression. J Hand Surg (Br) 1994; 19(1): 5-13.
Janz C, Hammersen S, Brocka M: Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: a review of Endoscopic Release of the transverse carpal ligament compared with open carpal tunnel release. Neurosurgery Quarter 2001; 11: 15-25.
Kerr CD, Githins ME, Sybert DR: Endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release. Clinical results. Arthroscopy 1994; 10: 266-269.
Kessler FB: Complications of the management of carpal tunnel syndrome. Hand Clin 1986; 2(2): 401-406.
Kuschner SH, Brien WW, Johnson D, Gelleman H: Complications associated with carpal tunnel release. Orthop Rev 1991; 20(4): 346-352.
May JW, Rosen H: Division of the sensory ramus communicants between the ulnar and median nerves: a complication following carpal tunnel release. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1981; 63(5): 836-838.
Nagle DJ, Fischer TJ, Harris GD, et al: A multicenter prospective review of 640 endoscopic carpal tunnel release using the transbursal and extrabursal Chow techniques. Arthroscopy 1996; 12: 139-143.
Nagle DJ, Harris G, Foley M: Prospective review of 278 endoscopic carpal tunnel releases using the modified Chow technique. Arthroscopy 1994; 10: 259-265.
Okutsu I, Ninomiya S, Takatori Y, Ugawa Y: Endoscopic management of carpal tunnel. Arthroscopy 1989; 5(1): 19-24.
Phalen GS, Gardner W, Lalonde A: Neuropathy on the median nerve due to compression beneath the transverse carpal ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1950; 32: 109-112.
Phalen GS: The carpal-tunnel syndrome. Seventeen years’ experience in diagnosis and treatment of six hundred fifty-four hands. J Bone Joint Surg 1966; 48(2): 211-228.
Straub TA: Endoscopic carpal tunnel release: A prospective analysis of factors associated with unsatisfactory results. Arthroscopy 1999; 15(3): 269-274.