2020, Number 07
<< Back Next >>
Revista Médica Sinergia 2020; 5 (07)
Survival in patients with breast cancer according to their immunohistochemistry experience of the National Oncological Institute - Society for the Fight Against Cancer, Guayaquil, Ecuador
Ulloa OP, Ronquillo TS, Sánchez PK
Language: Spanish
References: 24
Page: 1-10
PDF size: 143.20 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Breast cancer is the most common oncological pathology in
the female population worldwide, it has been determined that its prognosis
is linked to the diagnostic tumor stage, histological type and systemic
treatment that is applied according to the molecular subtype. The objective
of this study is to identify the association of the expression of hormonal
receptors, HER2/neu and Ki67 with the survival of patients with breast
cancer.
Methods: A descriptive, retrospective study was carried out at the
National Oncology Institute Dr. Juan Tanca Marengo in 284 patients
diagnosed with breast cancer from January 2006 to December 2013. Age,
histological diagnosis, clinical stage, molecular subtypes and survival
variables were analyzed.
Results: The average age was between 40 and
65 years, the most frequent histopathological diagnosis was infiltrating
ductal carcinoma in 236 patients, the percentage of Ki67 was higher than
14% in 60% of those killed, the most frequent molecular subtype luminal B
HER2 was positive with 95 cases and higher mortality in negative triples
with 12.76%.
Conclusion: Ki67 is a useful marker to assess the prognosis
of the patient, the molecular classification of the tumor will allow directing
the specific treatment and thereby obtaining the clinical re-staging of the
patient.
REFERENCES
Ferlay, J., Shin, H. R., Bray, F., Forman, D., Mathers, C., & Parkin, D. M. (2010). Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. International journal of cancer, 127(12), 2893-2917. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.25516
Cáncer en Guayaquil - Registro de Tumores 2011 - 2017 Autor: Sociedad de Lucha Contra el Cáncer Sede Nacional Instituto Oncológico Nacional - Dr. Juan Tanca Marengo Consejo Editorial: Dr. Juan Tanca Campozano Editor: Dr. Carlos Arreaga Salazar.
Morrow, M., Strom, E. A., Bassett, L. W., Dershaw, D. D., Fowble, B., Harris, J. R.& Winchester, D. P. (2002). Standard for the management of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast (DCIS). CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 52(5), 256-276. https://doi.org/10.3322/canjclin.52.5.256
Stuart-Harris R, Caldas C, Pinder SE, Pharoah P. Proliferation markers and survival in early breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 85 studies in 32,825 patients. Breast.2008;17(4):323---34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2008.02.002
McShane LM, Altman DG, Sauerbrei W, et al. Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:9067–9072. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2004.01.0454
Joensuu H, Kellokumpu-Lehtinen PL, Bono P, et al. Adjuvant docetaxel or vinorelbine with or without trastuzumab for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2006;354:809–820. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa053028
Piccart-Gebhart MJ, Procter M, Leyland-Jones B, et al. Trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2005;353:1659–1672. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa052306
Romond EH, Perez EA, Bryant J, et al. Trastuzumab plus adjuvant chemotherapy for operable HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2005;353:1673–1684. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa052122
Patani N, Martin LA, Dowsett M. Biomarkers for the clinical management of breast cancer: international perspective. Int J Cancer. 2013;133(1):1---13. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.27997
Hilsenbeck SG, Ravdin PM, de Moor CA, et al. Time-depen- dence of hazard ratios for prognostic factors inprimary breast can- cer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1998;52:227–237. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006133418245
Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet2005;365:1687–1717. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140- 6736(05)66544-0
Dowsett M, Allred C, Knox J, et al. Relationship between quanti- tative estrogen and progesterone receptor expression and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status with recurrence in the Arimidex,Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination trial. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:1059–1065. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.12.9437
Viale G, Regan MM, Maiorano E, et al. Prognostic and predic- tive value of centrally reviewed expression of estrogen and pro- gesterone receptors in a randomized trial comparing letrozole and tamoxifen adjuvanttherapy for postmenopausal early breast can- cer: BIG 1-98. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:3846–3852. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.11.9453
Viale G, Regan MM, Maiorano E, et al. Chemoendocrine com- pared with endocrine adjuvant therapies for node-negative breast cancer: predictive value of centrally reviewed expression of es- trogen and progesterone receptors—International Breast Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:1404–1410. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.10.6393
Wirapati P, Sotiriou C, Kunkel S, Farmer P, Pradervand S, Haibe- Kains B, et al. Meta-analysis of gene expression profiles in breast cancer: toward a unified understanding of breast cancer subtyping and prognosis signatures. Breast Cancer Res. 2008;10(4):R65. https://doi.org/10.1186/bcr2124
De Azambuja E, Cardoso F, de Castro Jr G, Colozza M, Mano MS, Durbecq V, et al. Ki-67 as prognostic marker in early breast cancer: a meta-analysis of published studies involving 12,155 patients. Br J Cancer. 2007;96(10):1504---13. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603756
Sahin A, Ro J, Ro JY, Blick MB, el-Naggar AK, Ordonez NG, et al. Ki-67 immunostaining in node-negative stage I/II breast carcinoma Significant correlation with prognosis. Cancer.1991;68(3):549---57. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19910801)68:3<549::AIDCNCR2820680318> 3.0.CO;2-J
Mikami Y, Ueno T, Yoshimura K, Tsuda H, Kurosumi M, Masuda S, et al. Interobserver concordance of Ki67 labeling index in breast cancer: Japan Breast Cancer Research Group Ki67 Ring Study. Cancer Sci. 2013;104(11):1539---43. https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.12245
Park S, Koo JS., Kim MS, Park HS, Lee JS, Lee JS, et al. Characteristics and outcomes according to molecular subtypes of breast cancer as classified by a panel of four biomarkers using immunohistochemistry. Breast 2012; 21(1): 50–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2011.07.008
JA VAN, CJH HAGE, VELDE JPJULIEN, Tubiana-Hulin M, Vandervelden C. Preoperative chemotherapy in primary operable breast cancer: results from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer trial 10902. Impact of age, tumor characteristics, and treatment on local control and disease outcome in early stage breast cancer. 2001;: p. 33. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2001.19.22.4224
Von Minckwitz G, Untch M, Blohmer J, Costa S, Eidtmann H, Fasching P, et al. Definition and impact of pathologic complete response on prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in various intrinsic breast cancer subtypes. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2012; 30(15):1796-1804. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2011.38.8595
Bhargava R, Striebel J, Beriwal S, Flickinger JC, Onisko A, Ahrendt G,et al. Prevalence, morphologic features and proliferation indices of breastcarcinoma molecular classes using immunohistochemical surrogate markers. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2009;2:444-55.
Goldhirsch A, Winer EP, Coates AS, Gelber RD, Piccart-Gebhart M, Thürlimann B, et al. Personalizing the treatment of women with early breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2013. Ann Oncol. 2013 Sep 1;24(9):2206–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdt303
Ellis MJ, Suman VJ, Hoog J, Goncalves R, Sanati S, Creighton CJ, et al. Ki67 proliferation index as a tool for chemotherapy decisions during and after neoadjuvant aromatase inhibitor treatment of breast cancer: results from the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z1031 Trial (Alliance). Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2017; 35: p. 1061. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2016.69.4406