medigraphic.com
ISSN 1561-3070 (Electronic)

2019, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Cub Oftal 2019; 32 (1)

Effectiveness of phacoemulsification to control intraocular pressure in patients undergoing vitrectomy with silicone oil injection

Veitía RZA, da Conceição NFA, González PL, Fumero GFY, Pérez CEC, Bauza FY

Language: Spanish
References: 34
Page: 1-16
PDF size: 183.12 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective: Evaluate the effectiveness of cataract surgery to control intraocular pressure in patients undergoing vitrectomy with silicone injection referred by retina specialists to the Cataract Service of Ramón Pando Ferrer Cuban Institute of Ophthalmology from January 2016 to January 2017.
Methods: A descriptive prospective case-series study was conducted of 20 patients. The universe was all the patients undergoing vitrectomy with administration of silicone oil as a vitreal substitute who were diagnosed with cataract and ocular hypertension.
Results: Patients undergoing vitrectomy with silicone oil injection and cataract surgery were mostly male, mean age was under 60 years, and a relationship was found to underlying vitreoretinal disease. Cataract surgery was associated to a considerable reduction in intraocular pressure in the postoperative period. All patients achieved an open chamber angle after surgery, leading to a reduction in the use of topical medication. Eventual filtration surgery was not required.
Conclusions: In patients undergoing vitrectomy, cataract surgery leads to sustained intraocular pressure improvement until the sixth month of the postoperative period.


REFERENCES

  1. Blázquez Sánchez V. Díaz Castillo E. Innovaciones en la cirugía de catarata. Gac Opt Oftalmol. 2013;481(1):62-9.

  2. Rivas-Aguiño P, García-Amaris RA, Berrocal MH, Sánchez JG, Rivas A, Arévalo JF. Vitrectomía pars plana, facoemulsificación e implante de lente intraocular para el manejo de catarata y retinopatía diabética proliferativa: comparación de técnica quirúrgica combinada versus en dos tiempos. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2009;84(1):31-7.

  3. Cano RA, Quezada C. Cirugía vitreorretiniana bajo aceite de silicona. Rev Mex Oftalmol. 2014;88(2). Acceso: 08/05/2017. Disponible en: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0187451914000080

  4. Anaya-Pava EJ, Sáenz-Bocanegra CH, Baeza JA, Rodríguez V. Estudio retrospectivo de complicaciones asociadas al aceite de silicona. Experiencia de 5 años en un hospital público del norte de México. Rev Mex Oftalmol. 2017;91(2). Acceso: 15/05/2017. Disponible en: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0187451916300075

  5. Morales MC, Araiz J, Herrera I, Castiella G, Corcóstegui I, Corcóstegui G. Resultados clínicos de la cirugía combinada de cataratacon vitrectomía 23-gauge. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2012;87(11). Acceso: 05/01/2017. Disponible en: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0365669112002110

  6. Veitía ZA, García L, Bauza Y, Pérez EC, Rodríguez B, Duque AM. Microscopia confocal en pacientes vitrectomizados con aceite de silicona en cámara anterior. Rev Cubana Oftalmol. 2014; 27:189-96.

  7. Oudovitchenko E, Jaramillo OC, Ferrer Á, Rodríguez EL. Estimación biométrica del volumen de humor acuoso en ojos con aceite de silicona en medios opacos. Rev Salud Bosque. 2015;3(1):9-14.

  8. Miller JB, Papakostas TD, Vavvas DG. Complications of emulsified silicone oil after retinal detachment repair. Semin Ophthalmol. 2014;29(5-6):312-8.

  9. Veitía AZ, Gómez AC, Hernández JR, Bauza Y, López I. Cirugía de catarata en pacientes vitrectomizados con aceite de silicona. Rev Cubana Oftalmol. 2012;25(1):72-84.

  10. Hernández-Salazar L, Levine-Berebichez A, Celis-Suazo B, Rojas-Juárez S, García- Franco R, Ramírez-Estudillo A, et al. Complicaciones posoperatorias por utilización de aceite de silicona en cirugía vitreorretiniana. Rev Mex Oftalmol. 2009;83:171-5.

  11. Garcés A, Veitía S, López I. Cirugía de catarata en pacientes vitrectomizados. Rev Cubana Oftalmol. 2013;26:466-81.

  12. González SL. Complicaciones posoperatorias por utilización de aceite de silicona en cirugía vitreorretiniana. Rev Mex Oftalmol. 2009;83(3):171-75.

  13. Cortés JH, López-Portillo AM, Treviño-Cavazos EE, Bermejo-de la Peña FJ, Mohamed- Hamscho J. Presión intraocular en pacientes con aceite de silicona. Rev Mex Oftalmol. 2004;78(6). Acceso: 03/12/2016. Disponible en: http://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/revmexoft/rmo-2004/rmo046b.pdf

  14. Singh D, Chandra A, Sihota R, Kumar S, Gupta V. Long-term success of mitomycinaugmented trabeculectomy for glaucoma after vitreoretinal surgery with silicone oil insertion: a prospective case series. Retina. 2014;34(1):123-8.

  15. Romano V, Cruciani M, Semeraro F, Costagliola C, Romano MR. Development of ocular hypertension secondary to tamponade with light versus heavy silicone oil: A systematic review. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2015;63(3):227-32.

  16. Ozaki H, Huang J, Uchio E. Intraocular pressure abnormalities following silicone oil injection for complicated retinal detachments. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Science. 2013;54(15):2855.

  17. Saeed AM, Shalaby UA, Farid MF. Trabeculectomy with augmented adjunctive mitomycin-C and bevacizumab for persistent silicone oil induced glaucoma. Egypt Ret J. 2014;2. Acceso: 03/11/2016. Disponible en: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286923827

  18. Matić S, Popović Suić S, Biuk D, Matić M, Barać J, Vinković M. Influence of silicone oil tamponade after vitrectomy on intraocular pressure. Collegium antropologicum. 2013;37. Acceso: 08/03/2017 (Supl. 1). Disponible en: http://hrcak.srce.hr/102897?lang=en

  19. Sáenz-Francés F, García-Catalán R, Jerez-Fidalgo M, Fernández-Vidal A, Martínez-dela- Casa JM, Méndez-Hernández C. Concordancia entre la tonometría de aplanación de Goldmann y la tonometría de contorno dinámico: efectos de la morfometría corneal. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2011;86(9):287-91.

  20. Oncel B, Dinc U, Orge F, Yalvac B. Comparison of IOP measurement by ocular response analyzer, dynamiccontour, Goldmann applanation and noncontact tonometry. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2009;19 Access: 03/10/2017. Disponible en: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/38060761

  21. Pérez González H, Castro Blanco M, Gómez Martínez N, Rivera López M, García CY. Utilidad de la gonioscopia diagnóstica en el glaucoma. Rev Ciencias Médicas. 2014;18(5). Acceso: 03/10/2016. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1561-31942014000500020&lng=es

  22. Fernández-Vigo JI, Fernández-Vigo C, de la Casa JM, Sáenz-Francés F, Santos-Bueso E, Feijóo JG, Fernández-Vigo JA. Identificación de estructuras del ángulo iridocorneal mediante tomografía de coherencia óptica de dominio Fourier. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2016;91(2):74-80.

  23. Suárez M, Villaseñor J, Suárez LM, Suárez Licona LM, Quiroz H, Villar J. Facoemulsificación en ojos posvitrectomía pars plana. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2004. Acceso: 15/2/2017;79(11). Disponible en: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0365669110000043

  24. Weinreb RN, Aung T, Medeiros FA. The pathophysiology and treatment of glaucoma: a review. JAMA. 2014;311(18):1901-11.

  25. Corral L, Cohen S, Peyman G. Effect of intravitreal silicone oil on intraocular pressure. Ophthalmic Surg. 1987;18:446-9.

  26. Mansberger SL, Gordon MO, Jampel H, Bhorade A, Brandt JD, Wilson B, Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study Group. Reduction in intraocular pressure after cataract extraction: the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(9): 1826- 31.

  27. Tojo N, Otsuka M, Miyakoshi A, Fujita K, Hayashi A. Improvement of fluctuations of intraocular pressure after cataract surgery in primary angle closure glaucoma patients. Graefe's Arch Clin Experim Ophthalmol. 2014;252(9). Acceso: 08/03/2017. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24862301

  28. Cetinkaya S, Dadaci Z, Yener HI, Acir NO, Cetinkaya YF, Saglam F. The effect of phacoemulsification surgery on intraocular pressure and anterior segment anatomy of the patients with cataract and ocular hypertension. Ind J Ophthalmol. 2015;63(9):743-5.

  29. Chang TC, Budenz DL, Liu A, Kim WI, Dang T, Li C. Long‑term effect of phacoemulsification on intraocular pressure using phakic fellow eye as control. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38(5):866-70.

  30. Issa S, Pacheco J, Mahmood U, Nolan J, Beatty S. A novel index for predicting intraocular pressure reduction following cataract surgery. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89(5):543-6.

  31. Poley BJ, Lindstrom RL, Samuelson TW, Schulze R. Intraocular pressure reduction after phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation in glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous eyes: evaluation of a causal relationship between the natural lens and open angle glaucoma. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35(11):1946-55.

  32. Shrivastava A, Singh K. The effect of cataract extraction on intraocular pressure. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2010;21(2):118-22.

  33. Nonaka A, Kondo T, Kikuchi M, Yamashiro K, Fujihara M, Iwawaki T, et al. Angle widening and alteration of ciliary process configuration after cataract surgery for primary angle closure. Ophthalmology. 2006;113(3):437-41.

  34. Huang G, González E, Peng PH, Lee R, Leeungurasatien T, He M. Anterior chamber depth, iridocorneal angle width, and intraocular pressure changes after phacoemulsification: Narrow vs. open iridocorneal angles. Arch Ophthalmol. 2011;129(10). Acceso: 02/05/2017. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com