medigraphic.com
ISSN 0185-3252 (Print)
Revista de la Asociación Médica del Centro Médico ABC

2020, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

An Med Asoc Med Hosp ABC 2020; 65 (2)

Comparative study of pain limitation in patients with osteoarthrosis in total knee replacement with Attune prosthesis vs PFC-Sigma prosthesis

Alanís BLM, Azcona CA, Rivera RHA

Language: Spanish
References: 44
Page: 94-101
PDF size: 241.26 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: Knee joint replacement is the treatment of choice for knee osteoarthritis, one of the prostheses that are most frequently placed is the PFC Sigma. However, it has been reported that 20% of patients have pain limitations when performing daily activities, for this reason a new prosthesis has been designed in order to improve the limitation and satisfaction of patients with knee arthroplasty. Objective: Compare the PFC-Sigma prosthesis with the Attune, and to demonstrate that Attune has better results in terms of pain limitation and acceptance by patients. Material and methods: This was a retrospective analytical study evaluating 21 patients of the ABC Hospital from September 1 of 2013 to May 15 of 2016, undergoing TKA with PFC-Sigma prosthesis (57%) and Attune prosthesis (43%). KOOS and NPIS scale. Results: The patients with Attune prosthesis had satisfactory results compared to the patients with PFC-Sigma prosthesis in the KOOS scale in the section of daily activities and sports activities, in the NPIS scale there was no significant difference. Conclusions: The Attune prosthesis had satisfactory results compared to patients operated on with PFC-Sigma prostheses.


REFERENCES

  1. Góngora LH, Rosales CM, González I. Articulación de la rodilla y su mecánica articular. Medisan. 2003; 7 (2): 100-109.

  2. Wieland H, Michaelis M, Kirschbaum B. Osteoarthritis-an untreatable disease? Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. 2005; 4 (4): 331-344.

  3. Goodman S. Osteoarthritis. In: Yee A, Paget S, eds. Expert Guide to Rheumatology. Philadelphia, Pa.: American College of Physicians; 2005, pp. 269-283.

  4. Lawrence R, Felson D, Helmick C. Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the United States: Part II. Arthritis Rheum. 2007; 58 (1): 26-35.

  5. Heidari B. Knee osteoarthritis prevalence, risk factors, pathogenesis and features: part I. Caspian J Intern Med. 2011; 2 (2): 205-212.

  6. Kawamura H, Bourne R. Factors affecting range of flexion after total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci. 2001; 6 (3): 248-252.

  7. Rand A. Modular augments in revision total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 1998; 29: 347-350.

  8. Morrey B. Factors affecting flexion after total knee arthroplasty. Yearbook of Orthopedics. 2008, p. 116.

  9. Vera-Avilés FA, Negrete-Corona J, Jiménez-Aquino JM. Artroplastia total de rodilla, pronóstico al restablecer la línea articular. Acta Ortopédica Mexicana. 2012; 26 (6): 362-368.

  10. Gutiérrez-García JA, Sierra-Pérez M, García-Velazco RA. Artroplastia total cementada de rodilla: comparación entre el uso o no de isquemia en el resultado postoperatorio inmediato. Acta Ortopédica Mexicana. 2016; 30 (1): 7-12.

  11. Blanco F, Fernández-Sueiro J. Artrosis: concepto, clasificación epidemiología y patogenia. En: Reumatología: enfermedades del aparato locomotor, Vol. 1. Madrid: Aran; 1998.

  12. Bourne R, Chesworth B, Davis A. Comparing patient outcomes after THA and TKA: is there a difference? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009; 468 (2): 542-546.

  13. Association of American Retired Persons. Joint Replacement Surgery Patient Survey. Boston. MA, 2007.

  14. Rothman R, Parvizi J, Mortazavi S. Secondary resurfacing of the patella after primary TKA: does the anterior knee pain resolve? J Arthroplasty. 2010; 25 (3): e37.

  15. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Prevalence of disabilities and associated health conditions among adults: United States. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2001; 50: 120-125.

  16. Srikanth V, Fryer J, Zhai G. A meta-analysis of sex differences prevalence, incidence and severity of osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2005; 13 (9): 769-781.

  17. Sharma L. Osteoarthritis year in review 2015: clinical. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2016; 24 (1): 36-48.

  18. McWilliams D, Leeb B, Muthuri S. Occupational risk factors for osteoarthritis of the knee: a meta-analysis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011; 19 (7): 829-839.

  19. Murphy L, Helmick C. The impact of osteoarthritis in the United States. Orthopaedic Nursing. 2012; 31 (2): 85-91.

  20. Alford J, Cole B. Cartilage restoration, part 2: techniques, outcomes, and future directions. Am J Sports Med. 2005; 33 (3): 443-460.

  21. Dillon C, Hirsch R, Rasch E. Symptomatic hand osteoarthritis in the United States. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. 2007; 86 (1): 12-21.

  22. Treatment of Osteoarthritis of the Knee Guideline [Internet]. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2012 [cited 6 July 2016]. Available from: http://www.aaos.org/research/guidelines/TreatmentofOsteoarthritisoftheKneeGuideline.pdf.

  23. Mahmoudian A, Van Assche D, Herzog W. Towards secondary prevention of early knee osteoarthritis. RMD Open. 2018; 4 (2): e000468.

  24. Guía de Práctica Clínica: diagnóstico y tratamiento de la osteoartrosis de rodilla [Internet]. CENETEC. 2009 [Cited 6 June 2016]. Available from: http://www.cenetec.salud.gob.mx/interior/gpc.html.

  25. Cooper C, Adachi J, Bardin T. How to define responders in osteoarthritis. Curr Med Res Opin. 2013; 29 (6): 719-729.

  26. Parvizi JM, Lajam CM, Trousdale RT. Total knee arthroplasty in young patients with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003; 85-A: 1090-1094.

  27. Sultan PG, Most E, Schule S. Optimizing flexion after total knee arthroplasty: advances in prosthetic design. Clin Orthop. 2003; (416): 167-173.

  28. Varady NH, Grodzinsky AJ. Osteoarthritis year in review 2015: Mechanics. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2016; 24 (1): 27-35.

  29. Sharkey P, Hozack W, Rothman R. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2002; 404: 7-13.

  30. Noble PC, Gordon MJ, Weiss JM. Does total knee replacement restore normal knee function? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005; 431: 157-165.

  31. Victor J, Bellemans J. Physiologic kinematics as a concept for better flexion in TKA. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2006; (452): 53-58.

  32. Attune Knee System-Value Analysis Brief [Internet]. http://www.synthes.com/. 2016 [cited 11 June 2016]. Available from: http://synthes.vo.llnwd.net/o16/LLNWMB8/US%20Mobile/Synthes%20North%20America/Product%20Support%20Materials/Product%20Information%20Sheets/DSUS-JRC-0514-0188%20Val%20Brief.pdf.

  33. Keenan A, Wood A, Arthur C. Ten-year survival of cemented total knee replacement in patients aged less than 55 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012; 94-B (7): 928-931.

  34. Breugem S. Anterior knee pain after a total knee arthroplasty: what can cause this pain? World J Orthopedics. 2014; 5 (3): 163-170.

  35. Sánchez MM, Vasallo JY, Vega A. Manual socot, cirugía ortopédica artrosis de rodilla. 3ra ed. México: McGraw-Hill Interamericana 2002-2004. p. 649-657.

  36. Barlow B, Oi K, Lee Y. Incidence, indications, outcomes, and survivorship of stems in primary total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017; 25 (11): 3611-3619.

  37. Slover J, Md, Espehaug BM, Phd. Havelin, Md. Cost-effectiveness of unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty in elderly low-demand patients. A markov decision analysis. J Bone Joint Surg. 2006; 88 (11): 2348-2355.

  38. Clatworthy M. Outcome & survival analysis of conventional measured resection, neutral alignment attune TKA vs CAS anatomic tibia, balanced femur, constitutional alignment attune TKA. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017; 5 (5 suppl 5): 2325967117S0015.

  39. What is the KOOS? [Internet]. Koos.nu. 2016 [Cited 27 May 2016]. Available from: http://www.koos.nu/koospresentation.html.

  40. Ware J, Owens B, Akelman M. Preoperative KOOS and SF-36 scores are associated with the development of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis at 7 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2018; 46 (4): 869-875.

  41. Roos E, Lohmander L. The knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS): from joint injury to osteoarthritis. Health Quality Life Outcomes. 2003; 1 (1): 64.

  42. Lyman S, Lee Y, Franklin P. Validation of the KOOS, JR. A short-form knee arthroplasty outcomes survey. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 2016; 474 (6): 1461-1471.

  43. Carey B, Harty J. A comparison of clinical- and patient-reported outcomes of the cemented ATTUNE and PFC sigma fixed bearing cruciate sacrificing knee systems in patients who underwent total knee replacement with both prostheses in opposite knees. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018; 13 (1): 54.

  44. Ranawat C, White P, West S, Ranawat A. Clinical and radiographic results of attune and PFC sigma knee designs at 2-year follow-up: a prospective matched-pair analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2017; 32 (2): 431-436.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com