medigraphic.com
Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública

2020, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

salud publica mex 2020; 62 (3)

Perception of the use and understanding of nutrition labels among different socioeconomic groups in Mexico: a qualitative study

Nieto C, Castillo A, Alcalde-Rabanal J, Mena C, Carriedo Á, Barquera S

Language: English
References: 56
Page: 288-297
PDF size: 541.10 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective. To explore the perception of the use and comprehension of the nutrition labeling (GDA, NFT, NS) and claims in packaged foods among different socio economic-status (SES). Materials and methods. This was a qualitative study, 12 focus groups were performed in four cities of Mexico. Participants were recruited outside the supermarkets, which were selected according to SES using Basic Geostatistical Areas. The focus groups had a total of 78 participants. Results. Participants perceived several barriers to the use and understanding of the GDA; like technicalities of the terms used, and the format (small font size and percentages). Claims are mistrusted in general. Participants from the high SES believed that the claims are just a marketing strategy. Conclusion. This study shows the consumers’ difficulties to understand the current nutrition labeling system regardless SES. These data might call attention in order to implement a simpler nutrition labeling system that is understood regardless of SES.


REFERENCES

  1. Afshin A, Forouzanfar MH, Reitsma MB, Sur P, Estep K, Lee A, Murray CJL. Health effects of overweight and obesity in 195 countries over 25 years. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(1):13-27. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1614362

  2. Di Cesare M, Bentham J, Stevens GA, Zhou B, Danaei G, Lu Y, et al. Trends in adult body-mass index in 200 countries from 1975 to 2014: A pooled analysis of 1698 population-based measurement studies with 19.2 million participants. Lancet. 2016;387(10026):1377-96. https://doi. org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30054-X

  3. Hernández M, Rivera J, Shamah T, Cuevas L, Gómez L, Gaona E, et al. Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutrición de Medio Camino 2016. Ciudad de México: Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, 2016:1-154.

  4. Martínez-Steele E, Baraldi LG, Louzada ML da C, Moubarac JC, Mozaffarian D, Monteiro CA. Ultra-processed foods and added sugars in the US diet: evidence from a nationally representative cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2016;6(3):e009892. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009892

  5. Moubarac JC. Ultra-processed food and drink products in Latin America: Trends, impact on obesity, policy implications. Washington DC: OPS, 2015:1-58.

  6. Monteiro CA, Moubarac JC, Levy RB, Canella DS, Louzada ML da C, Cannon G. Household availability of ultra-processed foods and obesity in nineteen European countries. Public Health Nutr. 2018;21(1):18-26. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980017001379

  7. Cecchini M, Warin L. Impact of food labelling systems on food choices and eating behaviours: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized studies. Obes Rev. 2016;17(3):201-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12364

  8. Hodgkins CE, Raats MM, Fife-Schaw C, Peacock M, Gröppel-Klein A, Koenigstorfer J, et al. Guiding healthier food choice: systematic comparison of four front-of-pack labelling systems and their effect on judgements of product healthiness. Br J Nutr. 2015;113(10):1652-63. https://doi. org/10.1017/S0007114515000264

  9. Sacks G, Rayner M, Swinburn B. Impact of front-of-pack “traffic-light” nutrition labelling on consumer food purchases in the UK. Health Promot Int. 2009;24(4):344-52. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dap032

  10. Rincón-Gallardo Patiño S, Carriedo A, Tolentino-Mayo L, Allemandi L, Tiscornia V, Araneda J, et al. Review of current labelling regulations and practices for food and beverage targeting children and adolescents in Latin America countries (Mexico, Chile, Costa Rica and Argentina) and recommendations for facilitating consumer. Ciudad de México: United Nations Children’s Fund, UNICEF, 2016.

  11. Freire WB, Waters WF, Rivas-Mariño G, Nguyen T, Rivas P. A qualitative study of consumer perceptions and use of traffic light food labelling in Ecuador. Public Health Nutr. 2017;20(5):805-13. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S1368980016002457

  12. Corvalán C, Reyes M, Garmendia ML, Uauy R. Structural responses to the obesity and non-communicable diseases epidemic: Update on the Chilean law of food labelling and advertising. Obes Rev. 2019:13;20(3):367-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12802

  13. Arrúa A, Machín L, Curutchet MR, Martínez J, Antúnez L, Alcaire F, et al. Warnings as a directive front-of-pack nutrition labelling scheme: comparison with the Guideline Daily Amount and traffic-light systems. Public Health Nutr. 2017;20(13):2308-17. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S1368980017000866

  14. Khandpur N, de Morais Sato P, Mais LA, Bortoletto-Martins AP, Spinillo CG, Garcia MT, et al. Are front-of-package warning labels more effective at communicating nutrition information than traffic-light labels? A randomized controlled experiment in a Brazilian sample. Nutrients. 2018;10(6):1-

  15. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10060688 15. Kanter R, Vanderlee L, Vandevijvere S. Front-of-package nutrition labelling policy: global progress and future directions. Public Health Nutr. 2018;(16):1-10. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980018000010

  16. Ducrot P, Julia C, Méjean C, Kesse-guyot E, Touvier M, Fezeu LK, et al. Impact of different front-of-pack nutrition labels on consumer purchasing intentions. Am J Prev Med. 2016;50(5):627-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. amepre.2015.10.020

  17. Gorski-Findling MT, Werth PM, Musicus AA, Bragg MA, Graham DJ, Elbel B, et al. Comparing five front-of-pack nutrition labels’ influence on consumers’ perceptions and purchase intentions. Prev Med (Baltim). 2018;106:114-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.10.022

  18. Khandpur N, Swinburn B, Monteiro CA. Nutrient-based warning labels may help in the pursuit of healthy diets. Obesity. 2018;26(11):1670-1. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.22318

  19. World Cancer Research Fund International. Building momentum: lessons on implementing a robust front-of-pack food label. London: World Cancer Research Fund International, 2019.

  20. Stern D, Tolentino L, Barquera S. Revisión del etiquetado frontal: análisis de las Guías Diarias de Alimentación (GDA) y su comprensión por estudiantes de nutrición en México. Cuernavaca: Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, 2013:37.

  21. Barquera S, Campos-Nonato I, Hernández-Barrera L, Pedroza-Tobías A, Rivera-Dommarco JA. Prevalencia de obesidad en adultos mexicanos, ENSANUT 2012. Salud Publica Mex. 2013;55(suppl 2):s151-60. https://doi. org/10.21149/spm.v55s2.5111

  22. Hernández-Ávila M, Gutiérrez JP, Reynoso-Noverón N. Diabetes mellitus en México. El estado de la epidemia. Salud Publica Mex. 2013;55(1):129-36. http://doi.org/10.21149/spm.v55s2.5108

  23. Secretaría de Salud. Estrategia nacional para la prevención y el control del sobrepeso, la obesidad y la diabetes. Ciudad de México: Secretaría de Salud, 2013:105.

  24. NORMA Oficial Mexicana NOM-051-SCFI/SSA1-2010. Especificaciones generales de etiquetado para alimentos y bebidas no alcohólicas preenvasados-Información comercial y sanitaria. Ciudad de México: Diario Oficial de la Federación, 2010:1-31.

  25. Codex Alimentarius Commission: Guidelines for use of nutrition and health claims. In: CAC/GL 23-1997. Rome: Codex Alimentarius, 1997.

  26. ConMéxico. ConMéxico presenta nuevo programa de etiquetado. México: ConMéxico, 2011 [cited June 15, 2015]. Available from: http://checayelige. conmexico.com.mx/prensa/notas-de-prensa/conmexico-presentanuevo- programa-de-etiquetado.html

  27. Comisión Federal para la Protección contra Riesgos Sanitarios. Manual de etiquetado frontal nutrimental. Ciudad de México: Comisión Federal para la Protección contra Riesgos Sanitarios, 2015 [cited June 19, 2015]. Available from: https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/55012/ ManualEtiquetado_VF.pdf

  28. Secretaría de Salud. Emite la Secretaría de Salud emergencia epidemiológica por diabetes mellitus y obesidad. Ciudad de México: Secretaría de Salud, 2016 [cited June 16, 2015]. Available from: https://www.gob.mx/ salud/prensa/emite-la-secretaria-de-salud-emergencia-epidemiologica-pordiabetes- mellitus-y-obesidad

  29. Tolentino-Mayo L, Patiño SR, Bahena-Espina L, Ríos V, Barquera S. Conocimiento y uso del etiquetado nutrimental de alimentos y bebidas industrializados en México. Salud Publica Mex. 2018;60(3):328-37.

  30. CONEVAL. Medición de la pobreza en México y en las Entidades Federativas 2016. Ciudad de México: Consejo Nacional de Evaluación de la Política de Desarrollo Social, 2016.

  31. OECD. Adult education level (indicator). France: OECD, 2019. https:// doi.org/10.1787/36bce3fe-en

  32. De la Cruz-Góngora V, Villalpando S, Rodríguez-Oliveros G, Castillo- García M, Mundo-Rosas V, Meneses-Navarro S. Use and understanding of the nutrition information panel of pre-packaged foods in a sample of Mexican consumers. Salud Publica Mex. 2012;54(2):158-66.

  33. Consejo Nacional de Evaluación de la Política de Desarrollo Social. Rezago Social a Nivel Zonas Urbanas (AGEB urbanas). Ciudad de México: Coneval, 2010 [cited July 8, 2013]. Available from: https://www.coneval.org. mx/Medicion/IRS/Paginas/Rezago_social_AGEB_2010.aspx

  34. Consejo Nacional de Población. Índices de marginación a nivel localidad 2005. México: Conapo, 2007 [accesed 12 Aug 2015]. Available from: http://www.conapo.gob.mx/work/models/CONAPO/indices_margina/ marg_local05/libro/IndiceMargLoc2005.pdf

  35. Consejo Nacional de Población. Metodología de estimación del índice de marginación 2005. México: Conapo, 2007 [accesed 12 Nov 2015]. Available from: http://www.conapo.gob.mx/work/models/CONAPO/indices_ margina/margina2005/AnexoC.pdf

  36. Strecher V, Rosenstock I. The Health Belief Model. In: Cambridge Handbook of Psychology, Health and Medicine. London: Cambridge University Press, 1997:660. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05450.x

  37. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50(2):179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

  38. Fila SA, Smith C. Applying the theory of planned behavior to healthy eating behaviors in urban Native American youth. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2006;3:11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-3-11

  39. Nieto C, Alcalde R, Mena C, Carriedo A, Barquera S. Supplementary appendix I. Spanish Version. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12052806

  40. Neutens J, Rubinson L. Qualitative research. In: Research Techniques for the Health Sciences. 3rd ed. San Francisco CA: Benjamin Cummings, 2002:163-192.

  41. Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In: Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage, 1994.

  42. De la Cruz-Góngora V, Torres P, Contreras-Manzano A, Jáuregui de la Mota A, Mundo-Rosas V, Villalpando S, et al. Understanding and acceptability by Hispanic consumers of four front-of-pack food labels. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017;14(1):28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0482-2

  43. Menger-Ogle AD, Graham DJ. The influence of front-of-package nutrition claims on food perceptions and purchase intentions among Nepali consumers. Food Qual Prefer. 2018;66:160-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. foodqual.2017.12.017

  44. Brownell K, Koplan M. Front-of-package nutrition labeling - an abuse of trust by the Food Industry? Perspective. 2011;364(25):2373-5. https://doi. org/10.1056/NEJMp1101033

  45. Petrovici D, Fearne A, Nayga RM, Drolias D. Nutritional knowledge, nutritional labels, and health claims on food. Br Food J. 2012;114(6):768- 83. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070701211234318

  46. J. van Buul V, Brouns FJPH. Nutrition and health claims as marketing tools. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2015;55(11):1552-60. https://doi.org/10.108 0/10408398.2012.754738

  47. Lobstein T, Landon J, Lincoln P. Misconceptions and misinformation: The problems with Guideline Daily Amounts (GDAs). London: National Heart Forum, 2007.

  48. Academia Nacional de Medicina. Guías Alimentarias y de Actividad Física. Ciudad de México: ANM, 2015:1-118.

  49. Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Modelo de perfil de nutrientes de la Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Washington DC: OPS, 2016.

  50. COFEPRIS. Recomendaciones de la Organización Panamericana de la Salud/Organización Mundial de la Salud sobre el etiquetado para alimentos y bebidas no alcohólicas pre envasados en México y otros instrumentos normativos relacionados. Ciudad de México: Comisión Federal para la Protección contra Riesgos Sanitarios, 2016:1-12.

  51. World Health Organization. Guideline: Sugars intake for adults and children. Geneva: WHO, 2015.

  52. Roberto CA, Shivaram M, Martinez O, Boles C, Harris JL, Brownell KD. The Smart Choices front-of-package nutrition label. Influence on perceptions and intake of cereal. Appetite. 2012;58(2):651-7. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.appet.2012.01.003

  53. Vermeer WM, Steenhuis IHM, Leeuwis FH, Bos AER, De Boer M, Seidell JC. View the label before you view the movie: A field experiment into the impact of Portion size and Guideline Daily Amounts labelling on soft drinks in cinemas. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:438. https://doi. org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-438

  54. Crockett RA, King SE, Marteau TM, Prevost AT, Bignardi G, Roberts NW, et al. Nutritional labelling for healthier food or non-alcoholic drink purchasing and consumption. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;27(2): CD009315. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009315.pub2

  55. Kanter R, Reyes M, Corvalan C. Implementation of the advertising and labelling law in Chile: early results of impact on food reformulation. Ann Nutr Metab. 2017;71:223. https://doi.org/10.1159/000480486

  56. Contreras-Manzano A, Alejandra J, Velasco-Bernal A, Vargas-Meza J, Rivera JA, Tolentino-Mayo L, et al. Comparative analysis of the classification of food different nutrient profiling systems. Nutrients. 2018;10(6):737. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10060737




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com