medigraphic.com
ISSN 2307-2113 (Electronic)
Revista Cubana de Información en Ciencias de la Salud (ACIMED)

2019, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Revista Cubana de Información en Ciencias de la Salud (ACIMED) 2019; 30 (4)

Evolution of Spanish–Portuguese–Brazilian scientific production about physiotherapy in women's health care

Torres-Pascual C, Torrell-Vallespín S

Language: Spanish
References: 51
Page: 1-17
PDF size: 441.33 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The purpose of the study was to compare Spanish–Portuguese–Brazilian scientific production about physiotherapy in women's health care in the periods 2004-2008 and 2013-2017 and identify in the latter period the most relevant features of scientific production. A bibliometric study was conducted of the volume of production, the collaboration indices and guidelines, and the productivity of authors. Increase in production was significant from one period to the other (p< 0.04), with a rate of 606.06%. The topics most frequently dealt with were menopause (34%) and aging (24.03%). Universities in Brazil have greater research potential in the field, which reflects in both the number of studies (61.80%) and their degree and management of collaborative research. More commitment is required from authors (transience index is 83.58%) and from countries to continue working on their research lines about the study topic, so as to have leaders in the field and consolidate the scientific literature.


REFERENCES

  1. Berkley KJ. Primary Dysmenorrhea: An Urgent Mandate. Clinical Updates. 2013;21(3):1-8.

  2. Signorile PG, Baldi A. Looking for an effective and non-invasive diagnostic test for endometriosis: where are we? Ann Transl Med. 2018;6(Suppl 2):S106.

  3. Liu P, Liu Y, Wang G, Li R, Wei Y, Fan Y, et al. Changes of functional connectivity of the anterior cingulate cortex in women with primary dysmenorrhea. Brain Imaging Behav. 2018;12(3):710-7.

  4. Garrido LRH. Dolor pelviano crónico desde la perspectiva del dolor. Rev Med Clin Condes. 2013;24(2):191-5.

  5. Corsini-Munt S, Rancourt KM, Dubé JP, Rossi MA, Rosen NO. Vulvodynia: a consideration of clinical and methodological research challenges and recommended solutions. J Pain Res . 2017;10:2425-36.

  6. Arnold LD, Bachmann GA, Rosen R, Rhoads GG. Assessment of vulvodynia symptoms in a sample of US women: a prevalence survey with a nested case control study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196(2):128.

  7. Trutnovsky G, Plieseis C, Bjelic-Radisic V, Bertholiny Galvez MC, Tamussino K, Ulrich D. Vulvodynia and chronic pelvic pain in a gynecologic outpatient clinic. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;31:1-5.

  8. Vlanice Madruga D, Rodrigo Dalke M, Juraci Almeida C. Severe low back pain among pregnant women in Southern Brazil. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva. 2018;23(8):2487-94.

  9. Sangsawang B, Sangsawang N. Stress urinary incontinence in pregnant women: a review of prevalence, pathophysiology and treatment. Int Urogynecol J . 2013;24(6):901-12.

  10. Aydin M , Cayonu N , Kadihasanoglu M , Irkilata L , Atilla MK , Kendirci M . Comparison of sexual functions in pregnant and non-pregnant women. Urol J. 2015;12(5):2339-44.

  11. Taylor-Swanson L, Wong AE, Pincus D, Butner JE, Hahn-Holbrook J, Koithan M, et al. Thedynamics of stress and fatigue across menopause: attractors, coupling, and resilience. Menopause. 2018;25(4):380-90.

  12. Watt FE. Musculoskeletal pain and menopause. Post Reprod Health. 2018;24(1):34-43.

  13. Frange C, Naufel MF, Andersen ML, Ribeiro EB, Girão MJBC, Tufik S, et al. Impact ofinsomnia on pain in postmenopausal women. Climacteric. 2017;20(3):262-7.

  14. Luy M, Minagawa Y. Gender gaps - Life expectancy and proportion of life in poor health.Health Rep. 2014; 25:12-9.

  15. Nusselder WJ, Cambois EM, Wapperom D, Meslé F, Looman CWN, Yokota RTC, et al.Women's excess unhealthy life years: disentangling the unhealthy life years gap. Eur J Public Health. 2019;29(5):914-9.

  16. Fistarol M, Rezende CR, Figueiredo Campos AL, Kakehasi AM, Geber S. Time sincemenopause, but not age, is associated with increased risk of osteoporosis. Climacteric. 2019;8:1-4.

  17. Gómez-Cabello A, Vicente Rodríguez G, Vila-Maldonado S, Casajús JA, Ara I.Envejecimiento y composición corporal: la obesidad sarcopénica en España. Nutr Hosp. 2012;27(1):22-30.

  18. Lwow F, Jedrzejuk D, Dunajska K, Milewicz A, Szmigiero L. Cardiovascular disease riskfactors associated with low level of physical activity in postmenopausal. Polish women. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2013;29(7):683-6.

  19. Zgül S, Üzelpasaci E, Orhan C, Baran E, Beksaç MS, Akbayrak T. Short-term effects ofconnective tissue manipulation in women with primary dysmenorrhea: A randomized controlled trial. Ther Clin Pract. 2018;33:1-6.

  20. 20. Dieb AS, Shoab AY, Nabil H, Gabr A, Abdallah AA, Shaban MM, et al. Perineal massageand training reduce perineal trauma in pregnant women older than 35 years: a randomized controlled trial. Internat Urogynecol J. 2019:1-7.

  21. Soave I, Scarani S, Mallozzi M, Nobili F, Marci R, Caserta D. Pelvic floor muscle trainingfor prevention and treatment of urinary incontinence during pregnancy and after childbirth and its effect on urinary system and supportive structures assessed by objective measurement techniques. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019;299(3):609-23.

  22. Davidson PM, Newton PJ, Ferguson C, Daly J, Elliott D, Homer C, et al. Rating and rankingthe role of bibliometrics and webometrics in nursing and midwifery. Scientific World J. 2014:135812.

  23. 23.Alonso-Arroyo A, de Oliveira EF, Cabrini-Grácio MC, Pandiella A, Aleixandre-BenaventR. A bibliometric analysis of collaboration between Brazil and Spain in the field of medical research from 2002 to 2011. Invest Bibliotecol: Archivonom, Bibliotecol Inform. 2016; 30(69):197-221.

  24. Wang M, Li W, Tao Y, Zhao L. Emerging trends and knowledge structure of epilepsy duringpregnancy research for 2000-2018: a bibliometric analysis. Peer J. 2019;7:7115.

  25. Chen XL, Chen ZR, Cao ZL, Han K, Tong YW, Xiang XH, Hu CX. The 100 most citedarticles in ectopic pregnancy: a bibliometric analysis. Springerplus. 2016;5(1):1815.

  26. Kotepui M, Wannaiampikul S, Chupeerach C, Duangmano S. A bibliometric analysis of dietsand breast cancer research. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(18):7625-8.

  27. Moghimi M, Fathi M, Marashi A, Kamani F, Habibi G, Hirbod-Mobarakeh A, et al. Ascientometric analysis of 20 years of research on breast reconstruction surgery: a guide for research design and journal selection. Arch Plast Surg. 2013;40(2):109-15.

  28. Glynn RW, Scutaru C, Kerin MJ, Sweeney KJ. Breast cancer research output, 1945-2008: abibliometric and density-equalizing analysis. Breast Cancer Res. 2010;12(6):108.

  29. Qiu Y, Yang W, Wang Q, Yan S, Li B, Zhai X. Osteoporosis in postmenopausal women inthis decade: a bibliometric assessment of current research and future hotspots. Arch Osteoporos. 2018;13(1):121.

  30. Perna S, Peroni G, Miccono A, Riva A, Morazzoni P, Allegrini P, et al. MultidimensionalEffects of Soy Isoflavone by Food or Supplements in Menopause Women: a Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis. Nat Prod Commun. 2016;11(11):1733-40.

  31. Moseley AM, Elkins MR, Moseley AM. Societá Italiana de Fisioterapia and thePhysiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro). Arch Physiother. 2019;9:5.

  32. Glänzel W, Leta L, Thijs B. Science in Brazil: A macro-level comparative study.Scientometrics. 2006;67(1):67-86.

  33. Henríquez Fierro E, Zepeda González MI. Elaboración de un artículo científico deinvestigación. Cienc Enferm. 2004;10(1):17-21.

  34. Guimarães L, Freire JM. Los temas de salud en la Unión Europea: su impacto en la sanidadespañola. Cad Saúde Públ. 2007;23(Supl. 2):143-54.

  35. Rolfo C, Caglevic C, Bretel D, Hong D, Raez LE, Cardona AF, et al. Cancer clinical researchin Latin America: current situation and opportunities. Expert opinion from the first ESMO workshop on clinical trials, Lima, 2015. ESMO Open . 2016;1(4):000055.

  36. Mercado-Martínez FJ. Investigación cualitativa en América Latina: perspectivas críticas ensalud. Internat J Qualitat Meth. 2002;1(1):1-27.

  37. Bressan MP, Perlo M, Perlo E, Sánchez A. Porcentaje del PBI que otorga el Estado para laInvestigación de Ciencia y Tecnología. En: Manterola DC. Prioridades en investigación en salud. Int J Med Surg Sci. 2014;1(4):347-51.

  38. Sánchez Hernández E, de la Torre Vega G, Sorzano Galindo M, Ramos Dinza M, DuránFernández S. Factores limitantes de la producción científica en profesionales de la salud. MEDISAN. 2016;20(1):28.

  39. EULARINET. Coordinating the European Union and Latin American research andInnovation Networks Report. EULARINET; 2009 [acceso: 05/06/2019]. Disponible en: http://s3.amazonaws.com/zanran_storage/www.s2lat. eu/ContentPages/44567013.pdf

  40. Alarcón-Ruiz CA, Díaz-Barrera ME, Vera-Monge VA, Alva-Díaz C, Metcalf T. Abibliometric analysis of the Latin American research on stroke 2003-2017. World Neurosurg. 2019;129:545-54.

  41. Rovira J. Evaluación económica en salud: de la investigación a la toma de decisiones. RevEsp Salud Públ. 2004;78:293-5.

  42. Shubert A, Gländez W. Publication dynamics: models and indicators. Scientometrics.1991;20(1):317-31.

  43. Iribarren-Maestro I, Lascurain-Sánchez ML, Sanz-Casado E. Are multi-authorship andvisibility related? Study of ten research areas at Carlos III University of Madrid. Scientometrics. 2009;79(1):191-200.

  44. Olmeda-Gómez CA, Perianes-Rodríguez A, Ovalle-Perandones MA. Estructura de las redesde colaboración científica entre las universidades españolas. Univ Carlos III de Madrid. 2008;3:129-40.

  45. Huamaní C, González AG, Curioso WH, Pacheco-Romero J. Scientific production in clinicalmedicine and international collaboration networks in South American countries. Rev Med Chil. 2012;140(4):466-75.

  46. Lwow F, Jedrzejuk D, Dunajska K, Milewicz A, Szmigiero L. Cardiovascular disease riskfactors associated with low level of physical activity in postmenopausal Polish women. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2013;29(7):683-6.

  47. Rojas JS, Lopera VJS, Cardona VJ, Vargas GN, Hormaza AMP. Síndrome metabólico en lamenopausia, conceptos clave. Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol. 2019;79(2):121-8.

  48. Chescheir NC. Obesidad en el mundo y su efecto en la salud de la mujer. Obstet Gynecol.2011;117:1213-22.

  49. 49.Sociedad Española de Oncología Médica. Las cifras de cáncer en España. SEOM; 2018[acceso: 10/06/2019]. Disponible en: https://seom.org/seomcms/images/stories/recursos/Las_Cifras_del_cancer_en_Espana2018.pdf

  50. OPS/OMS. La salud y el envejecimiento. Washington D.C.: 130.ª Sesión del ComitéEjecutivo OPS/OMS; 2002.

  51. Arilha M, Hakkert R, Andino N, Díaz Tender A, Leonard D. Salud sexual y reproductiva dela mujer adulta mayor: un campo por explorar y evidenciar. UNFPA; 2003.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com