Déctor-Palma CE, Mera-Hernández CB, Valencia-Medina E, Tejeda-Romero C, González-Aldeco PM

Language: Spanish
References: 13
Page: 303-307
PDF size: 258.99 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: According to the WHO, the Caesarean Index should be 15-19%. In Mexico, since 2000 it has increased 33.7% in the public sector and 60.4% in the private sector. In the Cochrane review, «Continuous support for women during childbirth» reaffirms: increase in spontaneous vaginal delivery, decrease in the use of intrapartum analgesia, the rate of caesarean sections and instrumented delivery. Objectives: To evaluate the relationship between psychoprophylaxis and continuous emotional support to reduce the caesarean index. Material and methods: We evaluated 380 women with active pregnancy and active phase of labor at the Nuevo Sanatorio Durango in the period from June 2015 to June 2016. The evaluation included the presence of continuous emotional support, psycho-prophylaxis, use of pharmacological treatments and non-pharmacological for pain control and its correlation with the caesarean index. Results: The implementation of psychoprophylactics favored emotional support, reduced use of oxytocin and analgesics, decreasing the rate of caesarean section. Conclusions: Psychoprophylaxis and continuous emotional support decrease the use of oxytocin, decreasing the percentage of caesareans.

REFERENCES

1. Vogel JP, Betrán AP, Vindevoghel N, Souza JP, Torloni MR, Zhang J et al. Use of the Robson classification to assess caesarean section trends in 21 countries: a secondary analysis of two WHO multicountry surveys. Lancet Global Health. 2015; 3 (5): e260-270.

2. Ye J, Betran AP, Vela MG, Souza JP, Zhang J. Searching for the optimal rate of medically necessary cesarean delivery. Birth. 2014; 41 (3): 237-243.

3. Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Willan AR. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet. 2000; 356 (9239): 1375-1383.

4. Suarez L, Campero L, de la Vara E, Rivera L, Hernández M, Hernández M et al. Elevada recurrencia a las cesáreas: revertir la tendencia y mejorar la calidad en el parto. Revista de Salud Publica de México [Internet]. 2012 [cited 12 December 2017]; :1-5. Available from: http://ensanut.insp.mx/doctos/analiticos/Cesareas.pdf.

5. Chevalier V. Parto sin dolor. En: Kinsey A (Ed.). Embarazo, parto y post-parto. México: Ediciones Prisma, S.A. 1982, pp. 131-133.

6. González SE. Bosquejo histórico de la psicoprofilaxis en México. Memorias del Primer Encuentro Nacional de Educadores en Psicoprofilaxis Obstétrica. Jurica, Qro. 1983, pp. 6-23.

7. Hott J. An investigation of the relationship between psychoprophylaxis in childbirth and changes in self-concept of the participant husband and his concept of his wife. Image (IN). 1972; 5 (2): 11-15.

8. Salinas MA, Martínez SC, Pérez SJ, Karchmer KS. Cuidados para el embarazo, parto y bebé. México: Instituto Nacional de Perinatología. 1992.

9. Vigilancia y manejo del trabajo de parto en embarazo de bajo riesgo. México: Secretaría de Salud; 11 de diciembre de 2014.

10. Approaches to limit intervention during labor and birth. Committee Opinion No. 687. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 129: e20-28.

11. Hodnett ED GS, Hofmeyr GJ, Sakala C. Apoyo continuo para las mujeres durante el parto. Base de Datos Cochrane de Revisiones Sistemáticas. 2016, 4: CD003766.

12. Hott J. An investigation of the relationship between psychoprophylaxis in childbirth and changes in self-concept of the participant husband and his concept of his wife. Image (IN). 1972; 5 (2): 11-15.

13. Bergstrom M, Kieler H, Waldenstrom U. Psychoprophylaxis during labor: associations with labor-related outcomes and experience of childbirth. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010; 89 (6): 794-800.