medigraphic.com
ISSN 0301-696X (Print)
Órgano de difusión del Servicio de Sanidad Militar y del Colegio Nacional de Médicos Militares

2019, Number 5-6

<< Back Next >>

Rev Sanid Milit Mex 2019; 73 (5-6)

Comparative study of pain limitation in patients with osteoarthrosis of the knee operated with Attune prosthesis versus PFC Sigma prosthesis

Alanís BLM, Azcona CA, Rivera RHA

Language: Spanish
References: 45
Page: 288-296
PDF size: 246.97 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Joint replacement of the knees is the treatment of choice for gonarthrosis, which allows patients to regain mobility of the joints and reduce pain from it. Currently, one of the prostheses, which is most frequently placed in the world, is the PFC Sigma, which has obtained good results in recent years. However, it has been reported that 20% of patients, who have maintained this prosthesis, have referred limitations due to pain in the performance of daily activities, for which reason a new prosthesis has been designed in order to improve the limitation and satisfaction of patients with knee arthroplasty. The Attune is a new generation prothesis; therefore there are no studies that assess the improvement of this with its predecessor. The present study compares the PFC-Sigma prosthesis with the Attune, in order to demonstrate that the latter has better results in terms of the relationship between pain and acceptance.


REFERENCES

  1. Góngora LH, Rosales CM, González I. Articulación de la rodilla y su mecánica articular. Medisan. 2003; 7 (2): 100-109.

  2. Wieland HA, Michaelis M, Kirschbaum BJ, Rudolphi KA. Osteoarthritis -an untreatable disease? Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2005; 4 (4): 331-344.

  3. Goodman S. Osteoarthritis. In: Yee A, Paget S, eds. Expert guide to rheumatology. Philadelphia, Pa.: American College of Physicians; 2005, pp. 269-283.

  4. Lawrence R, Felson D, Helmick C, Arnold L, Choi H, Deyo R et al. Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the United States: part II. Arthritis rheum. 2007; 58 (1): 26-35.

  5. Heidari B. Knee osteoarthritis prevalence, risk factors, pathogenesis and features: part I. Caspian J Intern Med. 2011; 2 (2): 205-212.

  6. Kawamura H, Bourne R. Factors affecting range of flexion after total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci. 2001; 6 (3): 248-252.

  7. Rand A. Modular augments in revision total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 1998; 29: 347-350.

  8. NIH consensus conference: total hip replacement. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Total Hip Replacement. JAMA. 1995; 273 (24): 1950-1956.

  9. Morrey B. Factors affecting flexion after total knee arthroplasty. Yearbook of Orthopedics. 2008: 116.

  10. Vera-Avilés FA, Negrete-Corona J, Jiménez-Aquino JM. Artroplastia total de rodilla, pronóstico al restablecer la línea articular. Acta Ortopédica Mexicana. 2012; 26 (6): 362-368.

  11. Gutierrez-Garcia JA, Sierra-Perez M, García-Velazco RA. Artroplastia total cementada de rodilla: comparación entre el uso o no de isquemia en el resultado postoperatorio inmediato. Acta Ortopédica Mexicana. 2016; 30 (1): 7-12.

  12. Blanco F, Fernández-Sueiro J. Artrosis: concepto, clasificación epidemiología y patogenia. En: Reumatología: enfermedades del aparato locomotor, 1. Madrid: Aran; 1998.

  13. Bourne R, Chesworth B, Davis A, Mahomed N, Charron K. Comparing Patient Outcomes After THA and TKA: is there a difference? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010; 468 (2): 542-546.

  14. Association of American Retired Persons. Joint Replacement Surgery Patient Survey. Boston. MA. (2007).

  15. Parvizi J, Mortazavi SM, Devulapalli C, Hozack WJ, Sharkey PF, Rothman RH. Secondary resurfacing of the patella after primary TKA: does the anterior knee pain resolve? J Arthroplasty. 2010; 27 (1): 21-26.

  16. CDC. Prevalence of disabilities and associated health conditions among adults: United States. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2001; 50 (7): 120-125.

  17. Srikanth V, Fryer J, Zhai G, Winzenberg T, Hosmer D, Jones G. A meta-analysis of sex differences prevalence, incidence and severity of osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2005; 13 (9): 769-781.

  18. Treatment of Osteoarthritis of the Knee Guideline [Internet]. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2012 [cited 6 July 2016]. Available from: http://www.aaos.org/research/guidelines/TreatmentofOsteoarthritisoftheKneeGuideline.pdf.

  19. Mahmoudian A, Van Assche D, Herzog W, Luyten F. Towards secondary prevention of early knee osteoarthritis. RMD Open. 2018; 4 (2): e000468.

  20. McWilliams D, Leeb B, Muthuri S, Doherty M, Zhang W. Occupational risk factors for osteoarthritis of the knee: a meta-analysis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011; 19 (7): 829-839.

  21. Murphy L, Helmick C. The impact of osteoarthritis in the United States. Orthopaedic Nursing. 2012; 31 (2): 85-91.

  22. Alford J, Cole B. Cartilage restoration, part 2: techniques, outcomes, and future directions. The Am J Sports Med. 2005; 33 (3): 443-460.

  23. Dillon C, Hirsch R, Rasch E, Gu Q. Symptomatic hand osteoarthritis in the United States. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. 2007; 86 (1): 12-21.

  24. Sharma L. Osteoarthritis year in review 2015: clinical. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2016; 24 (1): 36-48.

  25. Guia de Práctica Clínica: Diagnóstico y Tratamiento de la Osteoartrosis de Rodilla [Internet]. CENETEC. 2009 [cited 6 June 2016]. Available from: http://www.cenetec.salud.gob.mx/interior/gpc.html.

  26. Cooper C, Adachi J, Bardin T, Berenbaum F, Flamion B, Jonsson H et al. How to define responders in osteoarthritis. Curr Med Res Opin. 2013; 29 (6): 719-729.

  27. Parvizi JM, Lajam CM, Trousdale RT, Shaughnessy WJ, Cabanela ME. Total knee arthroplasty in young patients with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2003; 85-A: 1090-1094.

  28. Sultan PG, Most E, Schule S, Li G, Rubash HE. Optimizing flexion after total knee arthroplasty: advances in prosthetic design. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003; (416): 167-173.

  29. Varady NH, Grodzinsky AJ. Osteoarthritis year in review 2015: mechanics. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2016; 24 (1): 27-35.

  30. Sharkey P, Hozack W, Rothman R, Shastri S, Jacoby S. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2002; 404: 7-13.

  31. Noble PC. Gordon MJ. Weiss JM. Does total knee replacement restore normal knee function? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005; 431: 157-165.

  32. Victor J, Bellemans J. Physiologic kinematics as a concept for better flexion in TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006; (452): 53-58.

  33. Attune knee system - value analysis brief [Internet]. http://www.synthes.com/. 2016 [cited 11 June 2016]. Available from: http://synthes.vo.llnwd.net/o16/LLNWMB8/US%20Mobile/Synthes%20North%20America/Product%20Support%20Materials/Product%20Information%20Sheets/DSUS-JRC-0514-0188%20Val%20Brief.pdf.

  34. Keenan A, Wood A, Arthur C. Ten-year survival of cemented total knee replacement in patients aged less than 55 years. J Bone Joint J. 2012; 94-B (7): 928-931.

  35. Breugem S. Anterior knee pain after a total knee arthroplasty: what can cause this pain? World J Orthop. 2014; 5 (3): 163-170.

  36. Sánchez MM, Vasallo Jl Y Vega A. Manual Socot, Cirugía Ortopédica Artrosis de rodilla. 3ra ed. México: McGraw-Hill Interamericana 2002-2004. p. 649-657.

  37. Barlow B, Oi K, Lee Y. Incidence, indications, outcomes, and survivorship of stems in primary total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surgery Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017; 25 (11): 3611-3619.

  38. Slover J, Espehaug B, Havelin Md. Cost-Eífectlvonoss Of Unicompartamental And Total Knoc Arthroplasty In Eldorly I ow Domnnd Patients. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2006; pp. 2348-2355.

  39. Clatworthy M. Outcome & Survival Analysis of Conventional Measured Resection, Neutral Alignment Attune TKA vs CAS Anatomic Tibia, Balanced Femur, Constitutional Alignment Attune TKA. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017; 5 (5 Suppl. 5): 2325967117S0015.

  40. Koh Y, Son J, Kwon S, Kim H, Kwon O, Kang K. Preservation of kinematics with posterior cruciate-, bicruciate- and patient-specific bicruciate-retaining prostheses in total knee arthroplasty by using computational simulation with normal knee model. Bone Joint Res. 2017; 6 (9): 557-565.

  41. Alviar M, Olver J, Brand C. Do patient-reported outcome measures in hip and knee arthroplasty rehabilitation have robust measurement attributes? A systematic review. J Rehabil Med. 2011; 43 (7): 572-583.

  42. What is the KOOS? [Internet]. Koos.nu. 2016 [cited 27 May 2016]. Available from: http://www.koos.nu/koospresentation.html.

  43. Ware J, Owens B, Akelman M, Karamchedu N, Fadale P, Hulstyn M et al. Preoperative KOOS and SF-36 Scores are associated with the development of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis at 7 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2018; 46 (4): 869-875.

  44. Roos E, Lohmander L. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): from joint injury to osteoarthritis. Health Quality Life Outcomes. 2003; 1 (1): 64.

  45. Lyman S, Lee Y, Franklin P, Li W, Cross M, Padgett D. Validation of the KOOS, JR: A Short-form Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes Survey. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016; 474 (6): 1461-1471.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com