medigraphic.com
Federación Mexicana de Ginecología y Obstetricia, A.C.

2020, Number 04

<< Back

Ginecol Obstet Mex 2020; 88 (04)

Ultrasonographic image duplication of an intrauterine unique fetus mimicking non-existing twin: case report

Salazar López-Ortiz C, Siu-Mogel G, Salazar-Trujillo JC, Vázquez-Alvarado AP, Teliz-Meneses MA, Medina-Castro N

Language: Spanish
References: 11
Page: 277-281
PDF size: 404.92 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Background: In obstetrics, ultrasonic artifactual mirror images are infrequent, but potentially dangerous since they can be mistakenly interpreted as heterotopic pregnancies, precluding diagnostic errors and iatrogenic interventions. These images require a reflection surface such as dilated bowl or plenty bladder to be generated.
Objective: We report a first trimester scan ghost twin, diagnosed since first trimester of pregnancy.
Clinical case: 39-year-old patient, with pregnancy due to in vitro fertilization, who attends ultrasound evaluation of the first trimester. Routine ultrasound at 11 weeks showed a mirror image and magnetic resonance imaging: a pregnant uterus with a hypoechoic retrouterine structure, with no fetus inside. The ultrasound mirror image reproduced again in the third trimester. The pregnancy came to an end and ended by abdominal route, without being able to demonstrate the structures that were noticed on the MRI.
Conclusion: Very few reports of obstetric ultrasound mirror images have been reported. We hypothesize that the transient retrouterine hypoecogenic structure observed by MRI was the reflective surface that create the ghost twin image.


REFERENCES

  1. Kremkau FW, Taylor KJ. Artifacts in ultrasound imaging. J Ultrasound Med 1986; 5: 227-37. https://doi.org/10.7863/ jum.1986.5.4.227.

  2. Feldman MK, et al. US artifacts. Radiographics 2009; 29 (4): 1179e89. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.294085199.

  3. Prabhu SJ, et al. Ultrasound artifacts: classification, applied physics with illustrations, and imaging appearances. Ultrasound Q 2014; 30 (2): 145-57. doi: 10.1097/ RUQ.0b013e3182a80d34.

  4. Lim BH, et al. The mirror image artifact of early pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 21: 518-20. doi: 10.1002/uog.121.

  5. Miglietta F, et al. Mirror-image artifact of early pregnancy on transvaginal sonography. J Ultrasound Med 2012; 31: 1858-59. https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2012.31.11.1858.

  6. Ahn H, et al. Mirror artifacts in obstetric ultrasound: case presentation of a ghost twin during the second trimester ultrasound scan. Fetal Diagn Ther 2013; 34 (4): 248e52. doi: 10.1159/000353702.

  7. Malhotra R, et al. Mirror image artifact mimicking heterotopic pregnancy on transvaginal ultrasound: case series. West J Emerg Med 2014; 15 (6): 712e4. 10.5811/ westjem.2014.5.22508.

  8. Russell J, et al. Apparent Heterotopic Pregnancy Created by Mirror Image Artifact. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2017; 39 (11): 961-62. 10.1016/j.jogc.2016.05.012.

  9. Ahmed R, et al. Just a mirage: heterotopic intrauterine and twin ectopic pregnancy mimicked by mirror imaging on ultrasound. Radiol Case Rep. 2017 Apr 8;12(2):422-426. 10.1016/j.radcr.2017.03.009.

  10. Arning C, Eckert B: The diagnostic relevance of colour Doppler artefacts in carotid artery examinations. Eur J Radiol 2004; 51: 246-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ejrad.2003.08.003.

  11. Goettler S, et al. Heterotopic Pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 17;375(20):1982. doi: 10.1056/NEJMicm1509537.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com