Valdés RY, Pérez EL, Sariego RMA, Valdés RY

Language: Spanish
References: 13
Page: 314-317
PDF size: 208.88 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Objective: to develop a methodological alternative that allows professionals to prepare and present research papers in a logical manner, with adequate writing and scientific language.
Materials and Methods: a qualitative and quantitative research model was used in which theoretical and empirical methods were used. The analysis, synthesis and contrast of the different criteria and positions of the authors of the reviewed literature was carried out and the group discussion was applied, which was carried out in three different groups.
Results: It was possible to elaborate a methodological alternative that allows all the professionals the elaboration and presentation of the works of investigation of logical form, with a writing and a suitable scientific language, contributing to perfect the scientific production of our Institution.
Conclusions: a more comprehensive vision for the obtaining and presentation of the scientific results is obtained and the strengths and weaknesses of the researchers of the research projects, aspirants of the doctorate process, as well as the review of articles published in the journal were identified. “Cuba and Health Panorama”. It constituted a tool for the integral preparation of the professionals of our Institution, greater scientific methodological preparation of our teachers, to organize, plan and execute the scientific work.

REFERENCES

1. Libro de resúmenes del LXXII Congreso Chileno e Internacional de Cirugía, Valdivia 1999.

2. Estrada CA, Patel SR, Talente G, Kraemer S. The 10-minute oral presentation: ¿what should I focus on? Am J Med Sci 2015; 329: 306-309.

3. Brent J, Kulig K, Rumack B. An analysis of the types of papers presented at the annual toxicology meetings. Vet Hum Toxicol 2014; 32:146-148.

4. Pihl A, Bruland OS. Oral presentations in science and medicine. An art in decline? Anticancer Res 2015; 20(5A): 2795-2799.

5. Palaoglu O. The art of scientific presentation. ActaNeurochir Suppl. 2002; 83:105-108.

6. Maddow CL, Shah MN, Olsen J, Cook S, Howes DS. Efficient communication: assessment-oriented oral case presentation. AcadEmerg Med 2016; 10:842-847.

7. Hoffman M, Mittelman M. Presentations at professional meetings: notes, suggestions and tips for speakers. Eur J Intern Med 2004; 15: 358-363.

8. Haber RJ, Lingard LA. Learning oral presentation skills: a rhetorical analysis with pedagogical and professional implications. J Gen Intern Med 2015; 16: 308-314.

9. Niamtu J 3rd. The power of PowerPoint. PlastReconstrSurg 2001; 108: 466-484.

10. Johnson CL. Abstracts to sell. J Burn Care Rehabil 1985; 6: 372-374.

11. Tejeda Fernández J. El proceso de investigación científica. Barcelona: Fundación La Caixa; 2016. p.14.

12. Cuba. Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología y Medio Ambiente. Indicaciones metodológicas para la actividad de programas y proyectos de ciencia, tecnología e innovación. La Habana: Dirección de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación; 2014.

13. Cuba. Ministerio de Educación Superior. Orientaciones para solicitar al CITMA el aval sobre los temas de investigación para doctorados que se desarrollan en las instituciones autorizadas del MES o de sus trabajadores en otras instituciones. La Habana: MES; 2016.