2006, Number 3
<< Back Next >>
Rev Mex Coloproctol 2006; 12 (3)
Primary repair vs colostomy in penetrating trauma from urban people
Abarca AF, Abarca RF, Izurieta TJC
Language: Spanish
References: 12
Page: 117-121
PDF size: 48.00 Kb.
ABSTRACT
The morbidity in patients with colon trauma has diminished ever since the first and second World War, this was due to the improvements in pre and postoperative, the advances in antibiotic therapy and the reduction of time between the injury and the surgical intervention. Currently you can find a large enough consensuses vouched for by several works and publications during the last 50 years with regards to colon trauma injuries after being repaired with the security during the first closing, which is a secure procedure in patients that were carefully selected for this application. We present a statistical revision of 42 patients with abdominal trauma and present colon injuries. These patients entered into a prospective study of 4 years from 2000 to 2004 at the Teodoro Maldonado Carbo Hospital in Guayaquil- Ecuador. We compared the use of the primary closing and the surgery derivative of colon trauma. Variables are analyzed such as the type of injury, the location of the injury, associated injuries, time of arrival, Flint scale, hospital stay and complication. And the morbidity is used as a method of evaluation for the Minitab program for the descriptive statistic with a 95% effective range as its interval. We reach a conclusion where the mortality does not change with surgery, on the contrary what diminished the morbidity is the primary closing as the ideal technique in the management of the colon injuries.
REFERENCES
Curran TJ, Brozota AP. Complications of primary repair of colon injury: Literature review of 2,964 cases. Am J Surg 1999; 177: 42-7.
Nahas CS. Ferimentos do Colon: Estudo do tratamento em 313 doentes. Dissertação de Mestrado Área de Clinica Cirúrgica do curso de pós-graduação da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, 1985.
Singer MA, Nelson RL. Primary repair of penetrating colon injuries: a systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45: 1579-87.
Bulger EM, McMahon K, Jurkovich GJ. The morbidity of penetrating colon injury: Injury 2003; 34: 41-6.
Eshraghi N, Mullins RJ, Mayberry JC, Brand DM, Crass RA, Trunkey DD. Surveyed opinion of American Trauma surgeons in management of colon injuries. J Trauma 1998; 44: 93-7.
Durham RM, Pruitt C, Moran J, Longo WE; Civilian colon trauma: Factors that predict success by primary repair: Dis Colon Rectum 1997; 40: 685-92.
Miller BJ, Schache DJ. Colorectal injury; where do we stand with repair. Aust N Z J Surg 1996; 66: 348-52.
Pezim ME, Vestrup JA. Canadian attitudes toward use of primary repair in management of colon trauma. A survey of 317 members of the Canadian Association of General Surgeons. Dis Colon Rectum 1996; 39: 40-4.
Kulkarni MS, Hindlekar MN. Primary repair or Colostomy in the management of civilian trauma. Indian J Gastroenterology 1995; 14: 54-6.
Fallon WF Jr. The present role of colostomy in management of trauma. Dis Colon Rectum 1992; 35: 1094-102.
Costa OL, Colombo CA, Oliveira JH, Motta MR, Yoshida OS, Faintuch J. Traumatic injuries of the Colon: primary suture or colostomy? Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo 1989; 44: 25-8.
Burch JM, Brock JVC, Gevitrzman L Feliciano DV, Mattox KL, Jordan GL Jr, DeBakey ME. The injured Colon. Ann Surg 1986; 203: 701-11.