Vidal JE, Aneiro AC, Álvarez AA, Sierra BEM, León PMQ

Language: Portugués
References: 16
Page: 1012-1019
PDF size: 2829.15 Kb.

ABSTRACT

The degenerative alterations of the column are included in the term of cervical espondilosis. The cervical spondylotic myelopathy it is the form more common of disfuntion of the spinal cord in bigger than 55 years. It is considered the surgical intervention in most of the cases of cervical spondylotic myelopathy evident from the clinical, given point of view the risk of neurological deterioration. In most of the cases of cervical myelopathy, the decompression of the spinal marrow generates stabilization or improvement of the function of the medullary long sheaves. The function is better when they recover well the dimensions of the vertebral conduit after the decompression, when the decompression is more precocious and when there is not considerable comorbility.

REFERENCES

1. Jo HJ, Shin MH, Hur JW, et al. Unrecognized shoulder disorders in treatment of cervical spondylosispresenting neck and shoulder pain. Korean J Spine. 2012;9:223-6.

2. Siemionow KB, Neckrysh S. Anterior approach for complex cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Orthop Clin North Am. 2012;43:41-52.

3. Lebl DR, Hughes A, Cammisa FP Jr. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: Pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and treatment. HSS J. 2011;7:170-8.

4. Mattei TA, Goulart CR, Milano JB. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and surgical techniques. ISRN Neurology. 2011:463729.

5. Odate S, Shikata J, Kimura H. Anterior corpectomy with fusion in combination with an anterior cervical plate in the management of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2013;25:133.

6. Wu J, Luo D, Ye X, Luo X, Yan L, Qian H. Anatomy-related risk factors for the subsidence of titanium mesh cage in cervical reconstruction after one-level corpectomy. Int J Clin Exp Med.2015;8:7405---11.

7. Paradells VR, Pérez JB, Vicente FJ,et al. Esophageal, pharyngeal and hemorrhagic complications occurring in anterior cervical surgery: Three illustrative cases. Surg Neurol Int. 2014;5:S126-30.

8. Wen ZQ, Du JY, Ling ZH, et al. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion in the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: Systematic review and a meta-analysis. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2015;11:161-70.

9. Tetreault LA, Kopjar B, Vaccaro A, et al. A clinical prediction model to determine outcomes in patients with cervival spondylotic myelopathy undergoing surgical treatment: data from the prospective, multicenter AOSpine North America study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95:1659-66.

10. Tetreault L, Kopjar B, Cote P, et al. A clinical prediction rule for functional outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy: analysis of an international prospective multicenter data set of 757 subjects. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97(24):2038-46.

11. Karpova A, Arun R, Davis AM, et al. Predictors of surgical outcome in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(5):392-400.

12. Lebl DR, Bono CM. Update on the dagnosis and management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015;23(11):648-60.

13. Toledano M, Bartleson JD. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Neurol Clin. 2013;31(1):287-305.

14. Rhee JM, Shamji MF, Erwin WM, et al. Nonoperative management of cervical myelopathy: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(Suppl 1):S55-67.

15. Pumberger M, Froemel D, Aichmair A, et al. Clinical predictors of surgical outcome in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: an analysis of 248 patients. Bone Joint J. 2013;95- B(7):966-71.

16. Nürick S. The pathogenesis of the spinal cord disorder associated with cervical spondylosis. Brain. 1972;95:87-100.