2018, Number 2
<< Back Next >>
Rev Odotopediatr Latinoam 2018; 8 (2)
Determination of the ideal children´s smile type according to the perception of parents and Pediatric dentists
Plata RJM, Torre MHHH, Martínez GGI
Language: Spanish
References: 24
Page: 154-165
PDF size: 844.67 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Aim: To compare the perception of parents
and pedodontists in relation to the ideal child
smile.
Material and Methods: 2 Groups of
evaluators: 97 parents (group 1) and 99 pedodontists
(group 2). Photographic observations
were performed in 25 photographs to determine
the perception of both groups regarding
the aesthetic smile. The groups were compared
using the chi-square test with p = 0.05.
Results: Expectations of the parents regarding
the aesthetics of the children’s smile, they
prefer moderate exposure of gingival tissue,
diastemas and interincisal spacings ; with an
average vertical distance. Pedodontists prefer
minimal exposure of gingival tissue, teeth
together, without diastemas or interincisal
spacings.
Conclusions: The hypothesis is accepted
because when comparing the perception
of parents and Pedodontists in relation
to the ideal child smile there was a significant
difference between the visual perception of
parents and professionals with respect to the
ideal smile.
REFERENCES
Maulik C, Nanda R. Dynamic smile analysis in young adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Othop. 2007;132: 307-15.
García Ruiz EP. Percepción estética de la sonrisa con respecto a la línea media y sonrisa gingival entre cirujanos dentistas, estudiantes de estomatología y personas comunes. UPAORep 2017.
Fernandez S. Análisis de la sonrisa y patrón facial en estudiantes de la Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos. UNMSM. 2008.
Hulsey M. An esthetics evaluation of lip-teeth relationships present in the smile. Am. J Orthod 2000; 57: 132-44.
Espeland LV, Stenvik A. Perception of personal dental appearance in young adults: Relationship between occlusion, awareness, and satisfaction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991; 100: 234-41.
Koenig Maunsell R, Lavado Torres A, Aguado Donayre J, Altamirano Quicaño M, Gallardo Barrera G, Ramos Neglia E. Características de la sonrisa y nivel de satisfacción en estudiantes de la Facultad. Revista Kiru. 2009; 6: 88-102.
Evans R, Shaw W. Preliminary evaluation of an illustrated scale for rating dental attractiveness. Eur J Orthod. 1987; 9: 314-8.
Tupinambá Rodrigues CD, Magnani R, Candido Machado MS, Batista Oliveira OJr. The Perception of Smile Attractiveness. Angle Orthod 2009; 79: 634-9.
Geron S and Atalia W. Influence of Sex on the Perception of Oral and Smile Esthetics with Different Gingival Display and Incisal Plane Inclination. Angle Orthod. 2005; 75: 778-84.
Noureddine A, Fron Chabouis H, Parenton S, Lasserre JF. Laypersons’ esthetic perception of various computer-generated diastemas: A pilot study. J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 112: 914-20.
Pithon MM, Bastos GW, Miranda NS, Sampaio T, Ribeiro TP, Gomes do Nascimento LEA, da Silva Coqueiro RS. Esthetic perception of black spaces between maxillary central incisors by different age groups. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Ortop. 2013; 143: 371-5.
Brisman AS. Esthetics: A Comparison of Dentists’ and Patients’ Concepts. JADA 1980; 100: 345-52.
España P, Tarazona B, Paredes V. Smile esthetics from odontology students' perspectives. Angle Orthod. 2014; 84: 214-24.
McLeod C, Fields HW, Hechter F, Wiltshire W, Wellington RJr. and Christensen J. Esthetics and smile characteristics evaluated by laypersons. Angle Orthod. 2011; 81: 198-205.
Graber LW, Lucker GW. Dental esthetic self-evaluation and satisfaction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1980; 77: 163- 73.
Dos Santos AP, Malta MC, de Marsillac MW, de Oliveira BH. Fluoride Varnish Applications in Preschoolers and Dental Fluorosis in Permanent Incisors: Results of a Nested-cohort Study Within a Clinical Trial. Pediatr Dent. 2016; 38: 414-18.
Furtado GE, Sousa ML, Barbosa TS, Wada RS, Martínez-Mier EA, Almeida ME. Perceptions of dental fluorosis and evaluation of agreement between parents and children: validation of a questionnaire. Cad Saude Publica. 2012; 28: 1493-505.
Clark DC, Hann HJ, Williamson MF, Berkowitz J. Aesthetic concerns of children and parents in relation to different classifications of the Tooth Surface Index of Fluorosis. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1993; 21: 360-4.
Woo D, Sheller B, Williams B, Mancl L, Grembowski D. Dentists’ and Parents’ Perceptions of Health, Esthetics, and Treatment of Maxillary Primary Incisors. Pediatr Dent. 2005; 27: 19-23.
Ramírez Peña HA, Rangel Padilla EE, Martínez-Menchaca HR, Rivera Silva G, Arredondo Campo G, Barba Borrego N, Gustavo Israel Martínez GI, Valencia Hitte R. Evaluación estética de seis tipos de coronas para dientes primarios. Rev Latinoam Odontoped. 2017; 7: 6-15 .
Kokich VO Jr, Kiyak HA, Shapiro PA. Comparing the perception of dentists and lay people to altered dental esthetics. J Esthet Dent. 1999;11: 311-24.
Hunt O, Johnston C, Hepper P, Burden D, Stevenson M. The influence of maxillary gingival exposure on dental attractiveness ratings. Eur J Orthod. 2002; 24: 199-204.
Kokich VO, Kokich VG., Asuman KH. Perceptions of dental professionals and laypersons to altered dental esthetics: Asymmetric and symmetric situations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006; 130: 141-51.
Dunn WJ, Murchison DF, Broome JC. Esthetics: patients' perceptions of dental attractiveness. J Prosthodont. 1996; 5: 166-71.