medigraphic.com
ISSN 2992-8036 (Electronic)
ISSN 2306-4102 (Print)
Órgano Oficial del Colegio Mexicano de Ortopedia y Traumatología

2019, Number 5

<< Back Next >>

Acta Ortop Mex 2019; 33 (5)

Total knee arthroplasty infection, what is the best strategy for better functional outcomes?

Crego-Vita D, Sánchez-Pérez C, Espigares-Correa A, Aedo-Martín D

Language: Spanish
References: 33
Page: 297-302
PDF size: 148.57 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: Surgical strategy in dealing with periprosthetic knee infections remains controversial. The goals of treatment are to eradicate infection, improve pain and joint function. Surgical management includes implant debridement and retention, prosthetic replacement in one-time, or two-stage replacement. This latest surgical strategy is considered the «gold standard», reaching healing rates up to 80%-100%, although little has been published about functional results. Material and methods: Retrospective study of 65 patients with periprosthetic knee infection. In 20 patients a replacement was made in a time and in 45 patients were in two stages. Pre- and post-operative evaluation with the modified HSS scale. All patients were treated with intravenous antibiotherapy, we evaluated the analytical and clinical response to confirm the eradication or not of the infection. Results: The infection was resolved in 39 out of 65 patients, 12 in the replacement group in a time and 27 for the two-stages group. No significant difference between the groups in relation to healing or functional result. However, there is a statistically significant difference between those patients who received oral antibiotic treatment prior to diagnosis and those who did not. Conclusions: The healing rate is similarly treated with replacement in a time and replacement in two times. We were unable to demonstrate superiority in the functional results between the two groups.


REFERENCES

  1. Parvizi J, Gerkhe T, Chen AF. Proceedings of the international consensus on periprosthetic joint infection. Bone Joint J. 2013; 95B(11): 1450-2.

  2. Teeny SM, Dorr L, Murata G. Treatment of infected total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1990; 5: 35-9.

  3. Wilson MG, Kelley K. Thornhill TS. Infection as a complication of total knee replacement arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990; 72: 878-83.

  4. Hirakawa K, Stulberg BN, Wilde AH. Results of 2 stage reimplantation for infected total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1998; 13: 22-8.

  5. Haleem AA, Berry DJ, Hanssen AD. Mid term to long term follow up of two stage reimplantation for infected total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; 428: 35-9.

  6. Hofman AA, Goldberg T, Tanner AM, Treatment of infected total knee arthroplasty using an articulated spacer 2-12 year experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005: 430: 125-31.

  7. Tibrewal S, Malagelada F, Jeyaseelan L, Posch F, Scott G. Single stage revision for the infected total knee replacement: results from a single centre. Bone Joint J. 2014; 96B(6): 759-64.

  8. Singer J, Merz A, Frommelt L, Fink B. High rate of infection control with one stage revision of septic knee prosthesis excluding MRSA and MRSE. Clin Ortop Relat Res. 2012; 470(5): 1461-71.

  9. Kurtz M, Lau EC, Ong KL, Adler EM, Kolisek FR, Manley MT. Economic burden of periprosthetic joint infection in the United States. J Arthroplasty. 2012; 27(8 Suppl): 61-5.e1.

  10. Tsukuyama DT, Estrada R, Gustilo RB. Infection after total hip arthroplasty: a study of the treatment of one hundred and six infection. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996; 78(4):512-23.

  11. Parvizi J, Fassihi SC, Enayatollahi MA. Diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection following hip and knee arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North America. 2016; 47(3): 505-15.

  12. Malekzadeh D, Osmon DR, Lahr BD, et al. Prior use of antimicrobial therapy is a risk factor for culture negative prosthetic joint infection. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010; 468(8): 2039-45.

  13. Cobo J, Del Pozo JL. Prosthetic joint infection: diagnosis and management. Expert Rev Anti Ther. 2011; 9(9): 787-802.

  14. Jämsen E, Stogiannidis I, Malmivaara A, Pajamäki J, Puolakka T, Konttinen YT. Outcome of prosthesis exchange for infected knee arthroplastya: the effect of treatment approach. Acta Orthop. 2009; 80(1): 67-77.

  15. Masters JP, Smith NA, Foguet P, Reed M, Parsons H, Sprowson AP. A systematic review of the evidence for single stage and two stage revision of infected knee replacement. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013; 14(1): 222.

  16. Callaghan JJ, Katz RP, Johnston RC. One stage revision surgery of the infected hip: a minimum 10 year follow up study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999; 369: 139-43.

  17. Bachmeier CJ, March LM, Cross MJ, et al. A comparison of outcomes in osteoarthritis patients undergoing total hip and knee replacement surgery. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2001; 9: 137-46.

  18. Fortin PR, Penrod JR, Clarke AE, St-Pierre Y, Joseph L, Bélisle P, et al. Timing of total joint replacement affects clinical outcomes among patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. Arthritis Rheum. 2002; 46: 3327-46.

  19. Raut W, Siney PD, Wroblewski BM. One stage revision of infected total hip replacement with discharging sinuses. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994; 76: 721-4.

  20. Javier Ariza, Gorane Euba y Óscar Murillo. Infecciones relacionadas con las prótesis articulares. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2008; 26(6): 380-90.

  21. Zhang M, Yan CH, Chan PK, Yuen F, Chiu KY. Polyethilene insert exchange is crucial in debridement for acute periprosthetic infections following total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2016; 30: 36-41.

  22. McCann M T, Gilmore B F, Gorman S P. Staphylococcus epidermidis device-related infections: pathogenesis and clinical management. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2008; 60(12): 1551-71.

  23. Kloos W E, Bannerman T L. Update on clinical significance of coagulase-negative staphylococci. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1994; 7: 117-40.

  24. Banit DM, Kaufer H, Hartford JM. Intraoperative frozen section analysis in revision total joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002; 401: 230-8.

  25. Nagra NS, Hamilton TW, Ganatra S, Murray DW, Pandit H. One-stage versus two-stage exchange arthroplasty for infected total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016; 24(10): 3106-14.

  26. Haddad FS, Sukeik M, Alazzawi S. Is single-stage revision according to a strict protocol effective in treatment of chronic knee arthroplasty infections? Clin Ortop Relat Res. 2014; 473: 8-14.

  27. Modified Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Scoring System. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. 2006; 20(8): S100-S101.

  28. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the knee society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989; (248): 13-4.

  29. Dzaja I, Howard J, Somerville L, Lanting B. Functional outcomes of acutely infected knee arthroplasty: a comparison of different surgical treatment options. J Can Chir. 2015; 58: 402-7.

  30. Leonard HA, Liddle AD, Burke O, Murray DW, Pandit H. Single or two-stage revision for infected total hip arthroplasty? a systematic review of the literature. Clin Orthop and Relat Res. 2014; 472: 1036-42.

  31. Oussedik SI, Dobb MB, Haddad FS. Outcomes of revision total hip replacement for infection after grading according to a standard protocol. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010; 92: 1222-6.

  32. Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, Mahomed NN, Charron KD. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010; 468: 57-63.

  33. Moore AJ, Bloom AW, Whitehouse MR, Gooberman-Hill R. Managing uncertainty – a qualitative study of surgeons’ decision making for one-stage and two-stage revision surgery for prosthetic hip joint infection. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017; 18(1): 154.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com