medigraphic.com
ISSN 1561-3100 (Print)

2019, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Revista Cubana de Ortopedia y Traumatología 2019; 33 (1)

Femoral offset in the clinical and functional results of patients

López-Trabucco RE, Pelayo-de-Tomás JM, Novoa-Parra CD, Morales Suárez-Varela M, Rodrigo-Pérez JL

Language: Spanish
References: 50
Page: 1-18
PDF size: 588.16 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: The restoration of biomechanical forces through offset adjustment and limb length has become an important objective when the surgeon seeks a good postoperative functional result. However, the clinical advantages of femoral offset restoration and complications of restoration failure have not been clearly established.
Objective: To evaluate the effect of offset or femoral cantilever on the clinical and functional results of the patients.
Acquisition of evidence: An exploration was carried out in the Pubmed database, with the keywords: “hip arthroplasty”, “hip prosthesis”, “clinical result” and “functional result”. We searched for articles published from 2008 to 2018, based on humans and written in English, Spanish or French. Six articles were selected because they clearly explained the presence of a radiological measurement of the femoral offset, including validated scales and comparative analysis.
Results: The literature consulted reflected heterogeneous results. In the group of patients with decreased offset, one article showed less function. In another study, a better score was observed in the group of patients with increased offset. In turn, one investigation reported less pain was found in the reduced offset group.
Conclusions: Due to the inconsistency in the results and the methodologies used, it has not been possible to recognize the clinical and functional benefit of offset restoration. Some authors included in this review, after not finding statistically significant differences, stated that the restoration or increase of the femoral offset provided good results, without negative effects.


REFERENCES

  1. Krishnan H, Krishnan SP, Blunn G, Skinner JA, Hart AJ. Modular neck femoral stems. Bone Joint J. 2013;95-B(8):1011-21.

  2. Massin P, Geais L, Astoin E, Simondi M, Lavaste F. The anatomic basis for the concept of lateralized femoral stems: a frontal plane radiographic study of the proximal femur. J Arthroplasty. 2000;15(1):93-101.

  3. Traina F, De Fine M, Biondi F, Tassinari E, Galvani A, Toni A. The influence of the centre of rotation on implant survival using a modular stem hip prosthesis. Int Orthop. 2009;33(6):1513-8.

  4. Traina F, De Fine M, Tassinari E, Sudanese A, Calderoni PP, Toni A. Modular neck prostheses in DDH patients: 11-year results. J Orthop Sci. 2011;16(1):14-20.

  5. McGrory JB, Morrey BF, Cahalan TD, An KN, Cabanela ME. Effect of femoral offset on range of motion and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995;77(6):865-9.

  6. Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH. Soft tissue balancing: the hip. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17(4Suppl1):17-22.

  7. Harles MN, Bourne RB, Davey JR, Greenwald AS, Morrey BF, Rorabeck CH. Soft- tissue balancing of the hip: the role of femoral offset restoration. Instr Course Lect. 2005;54:131-41.

  8. Tezuka T, Inaba Y, Kobayashi N, Ike H, Kubota S, Kawamura M, et al. Effects of hip joint center location and femoral o set on abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. Mod Rheumatol. 2015;25(4):630-6.

  9. Berstock JR, Hughes AM, Lindh AM, Smith EJ. A radiographic comparison of femoral offset after cemented and cementless total hip arthroplasty. Hip Int. 2014;24(6):582-6.

  10. De Fine M, Romagnoli M, Toscano A, Bondi A, Nanni M, Zaffagnini S. Is there a role for femoral offset restoration during total hip arthroplasty? A systematic review. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017;103(3):349-55.

  11. Urrútia G, Bonfill X. PRISMA declaration: a proposal to improve the publication of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Med Clin (Barc). 2010 Oct 9;135(11):507-11.

  12. Cassidy KA, Noticewala MS, Macaulay W, Lee JH, Geller JA. Effect of femoral offset on pain and function after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27(10):1863-9.

  13. Liebs TR, Nasser L, Herzberg W, Rüther W, Hassenpflug J. The influence of femoral offset on health-related quality of life after total hip replacement. Bone Joint J. 2014;96-B(1):36-42.

  14. Bjørdal F, Bjørgul K. The role of femoral offset and abductor lever arm in total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Traumatol. 2015;16(4):325-30.

  15. Mahmood SS, Mukka SS, Crnalic S, Wretenberg P, Sayed-Noor AS. Association between changes in global femoral offset after total hip arthroplasty and function, quality of life, and abductor muscle strength. Acta Orthop. 2015;87(1):36-41.

  16. Clement ND, Patrick-Patel R, MacDonald D, Breusch SJ. Total hip replacement: increasing femoral offset improves functional outcome. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016;136(9):1317-23.

  17. Renkawitz T, Schuster T, Grifka J, Kalteis T, Sendtner E. Leg length and offset measures with a pinless femoral reference array during THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(7):1862-8.

  18. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN 2008). A guideline developer’s handbook. Edinburgh: SIGN; 2001.

  19. Harbour R, Miller J. A new system for grading recommendations in evidence based guidelines. BMJ. 2001;323(7308):334-6.

  20. Vierra BM, Blumenthal SR, Amanatullah DF. Modularity in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Benefits, Risks, Mechanisms, Diagnosis, and Management. Orthopedics. 2017;9:1-12.

  21. Badge R, Divecha H, Sochart D. Early periprosthetic metastasis following total hip replacement in a patient with breast carcinoma: a case report and review of literature. J Clin Med Res. 2011;3(4):203-6.

  22. Arnould A, Boureau F, Benad K, Pasquier G, Migaud H, Girard J. Computed tomography evaluation of hip geometry restoration after total hip resurfacing. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015;101(5):571-5.

  23. Duwelius PJ, Hartzband MA, Burkhart R, Carnahan C, Blair S, Wu Y, et al. Clinical results of a modular neck hip system: hitting the "bull's-eye" more accurately. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2010;39(10suppl):2-6.

  24. Steinberg B, Harris WH. The offset problem in total hip arthroplasty. Contemp Orthop. 1992;24:556-62.

  25. Flecher X, Ollivier M, Argenson JN. Lower limb length and offset in total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016;102(1Suppl):S9-20.

  26. Lecerf G, Fessy MH, Philippot R, Massin P, Giraud F, Flecher X, et al. Femoral offset: anatomical concept, definition, assessment, implications for preoperative templating and hip arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009;95(3):210-9.

  27. Dimitriou D, Tsai TY, Yue B, Rubash HE, Kwon YM, Li G. Side-to-side variation in normal femoral morphology: 3D CT analysis of 122 femurs. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016;102(1):91-7.

  28. Merle C, Waldstein W, Pegg E, Streit MR, Gotterbarm T, Aldinger PR, et al. Femoral offset is underestimated on anteroposterior radiographs of the pelvis but accurately assessed on anteroposterior radiographs of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94(4):477-82.

  29. Sariali E, Mouttet A, Pasquier G, Durante E. Three-dimensional hip anatomy in osteoarthritis: analysis of the femoral offset. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24(6):990-7.

  30. Sariali E, Mouttet A, Pasquier G, Durante E, Catone Y. Accuracy of reconstruction of the hip using computerised three-dimensional pre-operative planning and a cementless modular neck. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91(3):333-40.

  31. Sariali E, Mauprivez R, Khiami F, Pascal-Mousselard H, Catonné Y. Accuracy of the preoperative planning for cementless total hiparthroplasty. A randomized comparison between three-dimensional computerized planning and conventional templating. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2012;98(2):151-8.

  32. Pasquier G, Ducharne G, Ali ES, Giraud F, Mouttet A, Durante E. Total hip arthroplasty offset measurement: is C T scan the most accurate option? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2010;96(4):367-75.

  33. Huppertz A, Radmer S, Asbach P, Juran R, Schwenke C, Diederichs G, et al. Computed tomography for preoperative planning in minimal invasive total hip arthroplasty: Radiation exposure and cost analysis. Eur J Radiology. 2011;78(3):406-13.

  34. Hodge WA, Andriacchi TP, Galante JO. A relationship between stem orientation and function following total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1991;6(3):229-35.

  35. Sariali E, Klouche S, Mouttet A, Pascal-Moussellard H. The effect of femoral offset modification on gait after total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 2014;85(2):123-7.

  36. Franco-Ferrando N, Malik A, González-Della Valle A, Salvati EA. La planificación preoperatoria del reemplazo protésico en las fracturas de cadera del anciano. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol. 2010;54(2):136-45.

  37. Gallart X, Daccach JJ, Fernández-Valencia JA, García S, Bori G, Rios J, et al. Estudio de la concordancia de un sistema de planificación preoperatoria digital en artroplastia total de cadera. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol. 2012;56(6):471-7.

  38. Krishnan SP, Carrington RW, Mohiyaddin S, Garlick N. Common misconceptions of normal hip joint relations on pelvic radiographs. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21(3):409-12.

  39. Bonnin MP, Archbold PH, Basiglini L, Fessy MH, Beverland DE. Do we medialise the hip centre of rotation in total hiparthroplasty? Influence of acetabular offset and surgical technique. Hip Int. 2012;22(4):371-8.

  40. Judge A, Arden NK, Batra RN, Thomas G, Beard D, Javaid MK, et al. The association of patient characteristics and surgical variables on symptoms of pain and function over 5 years following primary hip-replacement surgery: a prospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 2013;3(3). pii: e002453.

  41. Incavo SJ, Havener T, Benson E, McGrory BJ, Coughlin KM, Beynnon BD. Efforts to improve cementless femoral stems in THR: 2- to 5-year follow-up of a high-offset femoral stem with distal stem modification (Secur-Fit Plus). J Arthroplasty. 2004;19(1):61-7.

  42. Husby VS, Bjorgen S, Hoff J, Helgerud J, Benum P, Husby OS. Unilateral vs. bilateral total hip arthroplasty - the influence of medial femoral head offset and effects on strength and aerobic endurance capacity. Hip Int. 2010;(2):204-14.

  43. Yamaguchi T, Naito M, Asayama I, Ishiko T. Total hip arthroplasty: the relationship between posterolateral reconstruction, abductor muscle strength, and femoral offset. J Orthop Surg. 2004;12(2):164-7.

  44. Asayama I, Chamnongkich S, Simpson KJ, Kinsey TL, Mahoney OM. Reconstructed hip joint position and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20(4):414-20.

  45. Kiyama T, Naito M, Shinoda T, Maeyama A. Hip abductor strengths after total hip arthroplasty via the lateral and posterolateral approaches. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25(1):76-80.

  46. Robinson M, Bornstein L, Mennear B, Bostrom M, Nestor B, Padgett D, et al. Effect of restoration of combined offset on stability of large head THA. Hip Int. 2012;22(3):248-53.

  47. Caeiro JR, Riba J, Gomar F, Grupo de Estudio Español del Sistema Acetabular Trident® de Cerámica. Incidencia y factores de riesgo de luxación tras artroplastias totales de cadera con sistema acetabular de cerámica. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol. 2011;55(6):437-45.

  48. Duwelius PJ, Burkhart B, Carnahan C, Branam G, Ko LM, Wu Y, et al. Modular versus nonmodular neck femoral implants in primary total hip arthroplasty: which is better? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(4):1240-5.

  49. Carothers JT, Archibeck MJ, Tripuraneni KR. Modular versus nonmodular femoral necks for primary total hip arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2015;44(9):411-4.

  50. Pelayo de Tomás JM, Rodrigo Pérez JL, Novoa Parra CD, Lizaur Utrilla A, Morales Suárez VM, Blas-Dobón JA. Cementless modular neck stems: are they a safe option in primary total hip arthroplasty? Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018 Apr;28(3):463-9.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com