medigraphic.com
Organo Oficial de la Sociedad Mexicana de Urología

2019, Number 5

Next >>

Rev Mex Urol 2019; 79 (5)

Is there erectile dysfunction after surgical management of penile fracture? Evaluation of penile function and sexual satisfaction

Magaña-González JE, Sánchez-Núñez JE, Jaspersen-Gastelum J, Rosas-Nava JE, Acevedo-García C, Hernández-Farías MÁ, Rodríguez-Valle ED, Cabrera-Mora NA, Hernández-Hernández RA, Rico-Frontana E

Language: Spanish
References: 17
Page: 1-11
PDF size: 315.03 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Background: Penile fracture is a urologic emergency and is defined as the rupture of the tunica albuginea of the cavernous body in erection, with or without urethral involvement. The aim of the present study was to describe the preservation of erectile function in patients with a history of penile fracture managed through surgical repair.
Methods: An observational, descriptive, analytic, and retrospective study was conducted on 32 patients diagnosed with penile fracture that were seen at the Urology Department of the Hospital General de Mexico, within the time frame of 2005 to 2019. The following variables were retrieved from their clinical records and analyzed: age at the time of fracture, sexual preference, marital status, mechanism of trauma, anatomic condition, medical-surgical care time, recovery time, penile curvature, erectile dysfunction (IIEF-5), fibrosis or urethral stricture as post-trauma complications, and follow-up duration.
Results: Intercourse was the mechanism of injury in 24 (75%) patients and sexual behavior was promiscuous in 16 (50%) patients. Regarding sexual preference, 31 cases were registered as heterosexual (97%) and the most frequent sexual position associated with penile fracture was “partner on top” in 12 patients (38%). Surgery duration was 720 minutes (12 hours) in 6 (19%) patients. On average, intercourse was resumed two months ± 1.3 months after the trauma. Currently, most of the patients have not presented with erectile dysfunction 19 (60%).
Conclusion: The majority of patients that receive timely surgical care upon diagnosis (before 35 hours have passed) have better prognosis and a favorable outcome in terms of erectile function, preventing fracture sequelae.


REFERENCES

  1. Falcone M, Garaffa G, Castiglione F, Ralph DJ. Current Management of Penile Fracture: An Up-to-Date Systematic Review. Sexual Medicine Reviews. 2018;6(2):253–60. doi: 10.1016/j. sxmr.2017.07.009

  2. Reis LO, Cartapatti M, Marmiroli R, Oliveira Júnior EJ de, Saade RD, Fregonesi A. Mechanisms Predisposing Penile Fracture and Long-Term Outcomes on Erectile and Voiding Functions. Advances in Urology. 2014; 2014:1– 4. doi: 10.1155/2014/768158

  3. Mydlo JH. Surgeon experience with penile fracture. J Urol. 2001;166(2):526–9

  4. Zargooshi J. Sexual Function and Tunica Albuginea Wound Healing Following Penile Fracture: An 18-year Follow-Up Study of 352 Patients from Kermanshah, Iran. J Sex Med. 20091;6(4):1141–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1743- 6109.2008.01117.x

  5. Bitsch M, Kromann-Andersen B, Schou J, Sjøntoft E. The elasticity and the tensile strength of tunica albuginea of the corpora cavernosa. J Urol. 1990;143(3):642–5. doi: 10.1016/s0022- 5347(17)40047-4

  6. Barros R, Schulze L, Ornellas AA, Koifman L, Favorito LA. Relationship between sexual position and severity of penile fracture. Int J Impot Res. 2017;29(5):207–9. doi: 10.1038/ ijir.2017.24

  7. Díaz JDS, Brambila EAS. Experiencia clínica en el manejo de la fractura de pene. Revista del Colegio Mexicano de Urología Nacional. 2014;29(1):8–10.

  8. Metzler IS, Reed-Maldonado AB, Lue TF. Suspected penile fracture: to operate or not to operate? Transl Androl Urol. 2017;6(5):981–6. doi: 10.21037/tau.2017.07.25

  9. Erectile dysfunction. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2(1):1–1. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2016.4

  10. Rosen RC, Cappelleri JC, Gendrano N. The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF): a state-of-the-science review. Int J Impot Res. 2002;14(4):226–44. doi: 10.1038/ sj.ijir.3900857

  11. Rosen R, Cappelleri J, Smith M, Lipsky J, Peña B. Development and evaluation of an abridged, 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) as a diagnostic tool for erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res. 1999;11(6):319–26. doi: https://doi. org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3900472

  12. Al Ansari A, Talib RA, Shamsodini A, Hayati A, Canguven O, Al Naimi A. Which is guilty in self-induced penile fractures: marital status, culture or geographic region? A case series and literature review. Int J Impot Res. 2013;25(6):221–3. doi: 10.1038/ijir.2013.16

  13. Casco S, Soto-Vega E, Arroyo C. Lesiones de pene: reporte de 4 casos. Rev Mex Urol. 2016;76(6):378–82. doi: 10.1016/j. uromx.2016.09.002

  14. Fula-Graude Sd, Urdiales A, Santana Z. Manejo de seis casos de fractura de pene. Rev. Mex Urol. 2009;69(5):235–7.

  15. Mahapatra RS, Kundu AK, Pal DK. Penile Fracture: Our Experience in a Tertiary Care Hospital. World J Mens Health. 2015;33(2):95– 102. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.2015.33.2.95

  16. Agarwal MM, Singh SK, Sharma DK, Ranjan P, Kumar S, Chandramohan V, et al. Fracture of the penis: a radiological or clinical diagnosis? A case series and literature review. The Canadian Journal of Urology. 2009;16(2):8.

  17. Nason GJ, McGuire BB, Liddy S, Looney A, Lennon GM, Mulvin DW, et al. Sexual function outcomes following fracture of the penis. Can Urol Assoc J. 2013;7(7–8):252–7. doi: 10.5489/ cuaj.199




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com