medigraphic.com
Federación Mexicana de Ginecología y Obstetricia, A.C.

2019, Number 11

<< Back Next >>

Ginecol Obstet Mex 2019; 87 (11)

Multidisciplinary management in cases of placental accreta

Reyes-Sepúlveda H, Soto-Fuenzalida GA, Pérez-Rodríguez RA, Sepúlveda-Malec R, García-Rodríguez C, García-Rodríguez LF, Fernández-Gómez A, Espino-Rodríguez M, Muñoz-Reyes P, Castro-Varela A, García-Márquez G

Language: Spanish
References: 17
Page: 726-733
PDF size: 330.09 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective: Describe step by step, the surgical approach of obstetric hysterectomy that we are doing in our center for the treatment of patients with placental acretism.
Materials and Methods: Retrospective study of the file review of 4 cases of pregnant patients with placental accreta, performed at the San José de Monterrey Hospital, by the ISSSTELEON obstetrics service, conducted between July 2017 to May 2018. They were analyzed using descriptive statistics surgical time, trans operative bleeding, pre and post operative hemoglobin, days of hospitalization, transition to therapy, trans surgical complications. A description was also made of the steps taken by the obstetrics team and the multidisciplinary support team.
Results: 4 hysterectomies were performed, obtaining decrease in trans operative bleeding, no globular packages were used; discharge from the 3rd to 6th day post surgery. There were no re-hospitalizations or re-interventions in the puerperal period; three of the 4 patients went to intermediate care for the first 24 hours for observation. Patients were not transferred to intensive care. During the procedures the newborns went to neonatal care without complications.
Conclusions: The approach of these patients has always represented a great challenge, due to their high morbidity and surgical morbidity. In this work we show an innovation in the approach of these patients, which has its cornerstone in pre-operative planning and multidisciplinary work of different specialties, with favorable results in the management and prognosis of these patients.


REFERENCES

  1. Organización Mundial de la Salud. Datos y cifras: Mortalidad Materna. Organización Mundial de la Salud. 2018. URL: http://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/ detail/maternal-mortality

  2. Say L, et al. Global Causes of Maternal Death: A WHO Systematic Analysis. Lancet Global Health. 2014; 2 (6): e323-e333. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70227-X. Epub 2014 May 5

  3. Ortiz R, et al. Histerectomía obstétrica en pacientes con placenta acreta, increta y percreta: comparación de dos técnicas quirúrgicas. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2016; 84 (4):209-216.

  4. Asturizaga P, Toledo Jaldin L. Hemorragia obstetrica. Revista Médica La Paz. 2014; 20 (2): 57-68. http://www.scielo.org. bo/pdf/rmcmlp/v20n2/v20n2_a09.pdf

  5. Aguilar Ponce S, et al. La histerectomía obstétrica como un problema vigente. Rev. Cuba. Obstet. Ginecol. 2012; 38 (1):107-116. http://www.scielo.org.bo/pdf/rmcmlp/ v20n2/v20n2_a09.pdf

  6. Reynosa-Oviedo Y, et al. Eficacia y seguridad del taponamiento uterino para control de hemorragia y disminución de histerectomía obstétrica. Cohorte histórica en Nuevo León, México, 2013. Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol. 2015: 66 (3): 186-94. https://doi.org/10.18597/rcog.23

  7. Nodarse Rodríguez A, et al. Comportamiento epidemiológico de la histerectomía obstétrica. Rev. Cuba. Obstet. Ginecol. 2013; 39 (2): 128-34. http://scielo.sld.cu/pdf/gin/ v39n2/gin08213.pdf

  8. Suárez González JA, et al. La histerectomía obstétrica como terapéutica segura en la morbilidad extremadamente grave. Rev. Cuba. Obstet. Ginecol. 2011; 37(4): 481-88. http:// scielo.sld.cu/pdf/gin/v37n4/gin05411.pdf

  9. Hernández JS, et al. Placental and Uterine Pathology in Women Undergoing Peripartum Hysterectomy. Peripartum Hysterectomy Pathologic Results. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2012; 119 (6): 1137-42. doi: 10.1097/ AOG.0b013e318253d78a

  10. De la Cruz C, et al. Cesarean section and the risk of emergency peripartum hysterectomy in high income countries: a systematic review. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015; 292 (6): 1201-15. doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3790-2.

  11. Calvo O, et al. Obstetric hysterectomy in the General Hospital Dr. Aurelio Valdivieso: three-year review. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2016; 84(2): 72-8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/pubmed/27290833

  12. Pradip Kumar S, et al. An alternate surgical approach to reduce hemorrhage and complications during cesarean hysterectomy for adherent placenta. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018; 228: 215-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ejogrb.2018.07.004

  13. Hollman-Montiel J, et al. Complicaciones de la histerectomía total abdominal ginecológica por patología benigna. Arch Inv Mat Inf. 2014; VI (1): 25-30. https://www.medigraphic. com/pdfs/imi/imi-2014/imi141f.pdf

  14. Blackwell RH, et al. Complications of Recognized and Unrecognized Iatrogenic Ureteral Injury at Time of Hysterectomy: A Population Based Analysis. Journal of Urology 2018; 199 (6): 1540-45. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.12.067.

  15. Shrivastava V, et al. Case-control comparison of cesarean hysterectomy with and without prophylactic placement of intravascular balloon catheters for placenta accreta. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197: 402.e1-402.e5, doi: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ajog.2007.08.001

  16. Ojala K, et al. Arterial embolization and prophylactic catheterization for the treatment for severe obstetric hemorrhage. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005 Nov; 84 (11): 1075-80. doi 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00727.x

  17. D'Antonio F, et al. Role of interventional radiology in pregnancy complicated by placenta accreta spectrum disorder: systematic review and meta‐analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jun; 53 (6): 743-51. doi: 10.1002/uog.20131




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com