Romero EJF, Del Villar TA, Cobos BMG, Moreno IDA

Language: Spanish
References: 6
Page: 120-125
PDF size: 378.28 Kb.

ABSTRACT

The reconstruction of the foot is divided into zones described by Hidalgo and Shaw, although it only involved the volar surface of the foot; Hollenbeck also divided the foot into zones giving reconstructive options in each case. In the «Lic. Adolfo Lopez Mateos» Medical Center we made seven flaps during the year 2017, one of which presented complete loss of the flap due to venous congestion and the other six had an adequate evolution. In this work we present two flaps respecting and identifying the critical points.

REFERENCES

1. Hidalgo DA, Shaw WW. Anatomic basis of plantar flap design. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986; 78 (5): 627-636.

2. Hollenbeck ST, Woo S, Komatsu I, Erdmann D, Zenn MR, Levin LS. Longitudinal outcomes and application of the subunit principle to 165 foot and ankle free tissue transfers. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125: 924-934.

3. Follmar KE, Baccarani A, Baumeister SP, Levin LS, Erdmann D. The distally based sural flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 119 (6): 138-148.

4. Han KD, Evans KK, Attinger CE. Local flaps in the foot. In: Chan F, Wei. Flaps and reconstructive surgery. Chapter 48, Elsevier 2a ed., 2016. pp. 540-570.

5. Afifi A, Mahboub TA, Losee JE, Smith DM, Khalil HH. The reverse sural flap. modifications to improve efficacy in foot and ankle reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2008; 61 (4): 430-436.

6. Henry GI, Kleiber GM. Comprehensive lower extremity anatomy. In: Neligan PC. Plastic surgery. Volume 4, Chapter 1, USA: Elsevier 2013. pp. 20-100.