Echtay-Martínez A, Reyes N, Espinoza-Díaz C, Morocho-Zambrano A, Salazar-Vilchez J

Language: Spanish
References: 19
Page: 685-695
PDF size: 454.66 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Objective: To compare in-hospital mortality predictive capacity of quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) and Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) in adult patients admitted with suspected infection.
Material and Method: A descriptive, cross-sectional study was carried out from January to July 2017 with a non-experimental design in adult patients admitted with infection of different source to the Hospital General del Sur Dr. Pedro Iturbe from Maracaibo city, Venezuela, selected by an intentional sampling. We quantified the qSOFA and SIRS scores, comparing the characteristics of admission, days of stay and in-hospital mortality in the two groups.
Results: There were included 60 subjects, 51.6% were men; the most frequent infectious source was the urinary tract with 43.3%, the use of vasoactive agents was necessary in 40% of the patients, while in-hospital mortality occurred in 45% of cases. The quick SOFA score was associated with a greater percentage of in-hospital mortality compared to the SIRS score, also exhibiting a greater predictive capacity with sensitivity of 96%, specificity of 33%, positive predictive value of 54%, negative predictive value of 92%, positive likelihood ratio: 1.4, negative likelihood ratio: 0.1 and area under the curve of 0.77 (0.65-0.89).
Conclusion: The quick SOFA score showed greater sensitivity and specificity for in-hospital mortality compared to the SIRS.

REFERENCES

1. Vincent JL, Opal SM, Marshall JC, Tracey KJ. Sepsis definitions: time for change. Lancet 2013;381(9868):774-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61815-7.

2. Bone RC, Balk R, Cerra FB, et al. Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine. Chest 1992;101(6):1644-55. DOI: 10.1378/chest.101.6.1644

3. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 2016;315:801-10. doi:10.1001/ jama.2016.0287

4. Kempker JA, Wang HE, Martin GS. Sepsis is a preventable public health problem. Crit Care 2018;22:116. doi: 10.1186/ s13054-018-2048-3.

5. Muñana-Rodríguez JE, Ramírez-Elías A. Escala de coma de Glasgow: origen, análisis y uso apropiado. Enfermería Universitaria 2014;11(1):24-35. DOI: 10.1016/S1665- 7063(14)72661-2

6. Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43(3):304-377. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4683-6.

7. Seymour CW, Liu VX, Iwashyna TJ, et al. Assessment of clinical criteria for sepsis: for the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 2016;315:762-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0288.

8. Park HK, Kim WY, Kim MC, et al. Quick sequential organ failure assessment compared to systemic inflammatory response syndrome for predicting sepsis in emergency department. J Crit Care 2017;42:12-17. doi: 10.1016/j. jcrc.2017.06.020.

9. Sprung CL, Sakr Y, Vincent JL, et al. An evaluation of systemic inflammatory response syndrome signs in the Sepsis Occurrence in Acutely ill Patients (SOAP) study. Intensive Care Med 2006;32:421-427. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-005-0039-8

10. Churpek MM, Zadravecz FJ, Winslow C, et al. Incidence and prognostic value of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome and organ dysfunctions in ward patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2015;192(8):958-64. doi: 10.1164/ rccm.201502-0275OC.

11. Roa AC. The health system in Venezuela: a patient without medication? Cad Saúde Pública 2018;34(3):e00058517. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x00058517.

12. Churpek MM, Snyder A, Han X, et al. Quick sepsis-related organ failure assessment, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, and early warning scores for detecting clinical deterioration in infected patients outside the intensive care unit. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2017;195(7):906-911. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201604-0854OC.

13. Herrea G. Evaluación del Score SOFA y el Quick SOFA para el diagnóstico de la sepsis en pacientes del Hospital Nacional Daniel Alcides Carrión, 2016. (Tesis para optar al título de Médico Cirujano). Consultado: 30-08-2018.

14. Pedraza F, Monares E, Galindo C, et al. 200 días de qSOFA, detección temprana de sepsis y disminución del riesgo. Med Crit 2017;31(5):265-267.

15. Osborn TM, Phillips G, Lemeshow S, et al. Sepsis severity score: an internationally derived scoring system from the surviving sepsis campaign database*. Crit Care Med 2014;42(9):1969-76. doi: 10.1097/ CCM.0000000000000416.

16. Phillips GS, Osborn TM, Terry KM, et al. The New York Sepsis Severity Score: Development of a Risk-Adjusted Severity Model for Sepsis. Crit Care Med. 2018;46(5):674-683. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002824.

17. Sartelli M, Abu-Zidan FM, Catena F, et al. Global validation of the WSES Sepsis Severity Score for patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections: a prospective multicentre study (WISS Study). World J Emerg Surg 2015;10:61. doi: 10.1186/s13017-015-0055-0. eCollection 2015.

18. April MD, Aguirre J, Tannenbaum LI, et al. Sepsis clinical criteria in emergency department patients admitted to an intensive care unit: an external validation study of quick sequential organ failure assessment. J Emerg Med 2017; 52(5): 622-631. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2016.10.012.

19. Serafim R, Andrade J, Salluh J, Póvoa P. A Comparison of the Quick-SOFA and Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome criteria for the diagnosis of sepsis and prediction of mortality: A systematic review and metaanalysis. Chest 2018;153(3):646-655. doi: 10.1016/j. chest.2017.12.015