medigraphic.com
ISSN 2448-8909 (Print)

2019, Number 5

<< Back Next >>

Med Crit 2019; 33 (5)

Comparison of Berlin vs Kigali criteria for diagnosis of the acute respiratory insufficiency syndrome

Mouret HUEG, Mendoza RM, López GA, Cortés MA

Language: Spanish
References: 25
Page: 221-232
PDF size: 306.07 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Epidemiological studies about the incidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in different countries vary from 10.1 to 86.2 per 100,000 in the general population. The epidemiology of the ARDS has not been reported in general population, hospital or intensive care units (ICU) of developing countries. The Berlin definition may not allow the identification of ARDS in environments with limited resources, which is why the Berlin criteria modified by Kigali was proposed in order to diagnose ARDS, when these limitations exist.
Objectives: To measure the effectiveness in the early diagnosis of ARDS when comparing the Berlin criteria vs the modification of Berlin by Kigali.
Material and methods: A comparative, longitudinal, prospective study was done during the period of January 1, 2018 to May 30, 2018, in the patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of Hospital General La Villa. Forty-two patients were included, of which 8 were eliminated, the Berlin and Kigali criteria were evaluated in 34 patients upon admission; the time to complete both criteria was also measured. An analysis of variance test (ANOVA) was conducted to determine if there was a significant difference in the early diagnosis of the ARDS.
Results: Statistically significant differences were found in the required time for diagnosing ARDS with Kigali vs Berlin criteria, with times of 2.4 hours (SD: ± 0.45 hours) and 4.7 hours (SD: ± 1.4 hours) respectively, likewise a linear correlation was found by Pearson test of PaO2/FiO2 and SpO2/FiO2. Linear regression was performed, and a severity scale was proposed for ARDS using the SpO2/FiO2 index.
Conclusions: According to the results, the Kigali scale represents a reliable method and can be considered as a potential alternative for the diagnosis of ARD, besides it can be comparable with the Berlin scale.


REFERENCES

  1. Bellani G, Laffey JG, Pham T, Fan E, Brochard L, Esteban A, et al. Epidemiology, patterns of care, and mortality for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in intensive care units in 50 countries. JAMA. 2016;315(8):788-800.

  2. Herridge MS, Moss M, Hough CL, Hopkins RO, Rice TW, Bienvenu OJ, et al. Recovery and outcomes after the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in patients and their family caregivers. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42(5):725-738.

  3. Sweeney RM, McAuley DF. Acute respiratory distress syndrome, seminar. Lancet. 2016;388(10058):2416-2430.

  4. Riviello ED, Kiviri W, Twagirumugabe T, Mueller A, Banner-Goodspeed VM, Officer L, et al. Hospital incidence and outcomes of ARDS using the Kigali modification of the Berlin definition. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;193(1):52-59.

  5. Brun-Buisson C, Minelli C, Bertolini G, Brazzi L, Pimentel J, Lewandowski K, et al. Epidemiology and outcome of acute lung injury in European intensive care units. Results from the ALIVE study. Intensive Care Med. 2003;30(1):51-61.

  6. Wang CY, Calfee CS, Paul DW, Janz DR, May AK, Zhuo H, et al. One-year mortality and predictors of death among hospital survivors of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40(3):388-396.

  7. Bellani G, Laffey JG, Pham T, et al, and on behalf of the LUNG SAFE Investigators and the ESICM Trials Group. The LUNG SAFE Study: a presentation of the prevalence of ARDS according to the Berlin Definition. Crit Care. 2016; 20(1): 268

  8. Fan E, Dowdy DW, Colantuoni E, Mendez-Tellez PA, Sevransky JE, Shanholtz C, et al. Physical complications in acute lung injury survivors: a two-year longitudinal prospective study. Crit Care Med. 2014;42(4):849-859.

  9. Buregeya E, Fowler RA, Talmor DS, Twagirumugabe T, Kiviri W, Riviello ED. Acute respiratory distress syndrome in the global context. Glob Heart. 2014;9(3):289-295.

  10. Shyamsundar M, Attwood B, Keating L, Walden AP. Clinical review: the role of ultrasound in estimating extra-vascular lung water. Crit Care. 2013;17(5):237.

  11. Angus DC. The acute respiratory distress syndrome: what’s in a name? JAMA. 2012;307(23):2542-2544.

  12. Lichtenstein D, Goldstein I, Mourgeon E, Cluzel P, Grenier P, Rouby JJ. Comparative diagnostic performances of auscultation, chest radiography, and lung ultrasonography in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Anesthesiology. 2004;100(1):915.

  13. Riviello ED, Kiviri W, Twagirumugabe T, Mueller A, Banner-Goodspeed VM, Officer L, et al. Hospital incidence and outcomes of the acute respiratory distress syndrome using the Kigali modification of the Berlin definition. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;193(1):52-59.

  14. Needham DM, Yang T, Dinglas VD, Mendez-Tellez PA, Shanholtz C, Sevransky JE, et al. Timing of low tidal volume ventilation and intensive care unit mortality in acute respiratory distress syndrome. A prospective cohort study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;191(2):177-185.

  15. Amato MB, Meade MO, Slutsky AS, Brochard L, Costa EL, Schoenfeld DA, Stewart TE, et al. Driving pressure and survival in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(8):747-755.

  16. Guérin C, Reignier J, Richard JC, Beuret P, Gacouin A, Boulain T, et al. Prone positioning in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(23):2159-2168.

  17. Papazian L, Forel JM, Gacouin A, Penot-Ragon C, Perrin G, Loundou A, et al. Neuromuscular blockers in early acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(12):1107-1116.

  18. ARDS Definition Task Force, Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, Ferguson ND, Caldwell E, et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin definition. JAMA. 2012;307(23):2526-2533.

  19. Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutrición 2016.

  20. Lichtenstein DA, Mezière GA. Relevance of lung ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute respiratory failure: the BLUE protocol. Chest. 2008;134(1):117-125.

  21. Baston C, West TE. Lung ultrasound in acute respiratory distress syndrome and beyond. J Thorac Dis. 2016;8(12):E1763-E1766.

  22. Chiumello D, Froio S, Bouhemad B, Camporota L, Coppola S. Clinical review: Lung imaging in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients an update. Crit Care. 2013;17(6):243.

  23. Bilan N, Dastranji A, Ghalehgolab Behbahani A. Comparison of the SpO2/FiO2 Ratio and the PaO2/FiO2 ratio in patients with acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome. J Cardiovasc Thorac Res. 2015;7(1):28-31.

  24. Rice TW, Wheeler AP, Bernard GR, Hayden DL, Schoenfeld DA, Ware LB, et al. Comparison of the SpO2/FiO2 ratio and the PaO2/FiO2 ratio in patients with acute lung injury or ARDS. Chest. 2007;132(2):410-417.

  25. Venegas SA, Cortés MJ, Flores LE, Colín RJ. Correlación de SpO2/FiO2 vs PaO2/FiO2 para monitoreo de la oxigenación en pacientes con trauma de tórax. Rev Asoc Mex Med Crit y Ter Int. 2018;32(4):201-207.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com