Bustamante QY, Karchmer KS

Language: Spanish
References: 20
Page: 62-66
PDF size: 131.34 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Surrogate motherhood is a technique of assisted reproduction that gives the opportunity to women with absence of functional uterus, homosexual couples and single men to reproduce. The success rate has been demonstrated in these cases but also the increase of obstetric complications in the gestational carriers. Given the increase in access to information, patients will demand this type of treatment so we have to know the definitions, as well as the rights of both the parents and the surrogate mother.

REFERENCES

1. Kapfhamer J, Van Voorhis B. Gestational surrogacy: a call for safer practice. Fertil Steril. 2016; 106 (2): 270-271.

2. Lasker SP. Surrogacy. Encyclopedia of global bioethics. Suiza, Springer International; 2016: 2760-2766.

3. Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Consideration of the gestational carrier: a comittee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2013; 99 (7): 1838-1841.

4. Christiansen K. Who is the mother? Negotiating identity in an Irish surrogacy case. Med Health Care Philos. 2015; 18 (3): 317-327.

5. Greenfeld DA. Effects and outcomes of third-party reproduction: parents. Fertil Steril. 2015; 104 (3): 520-524.

6. Patel NH, Jadeya YD, Bhadarka HK, Patel MN, Patel NH, Sodagar NR. Insight into different aspects of surrogacy practices. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2018; 11 (3): 212-218.

7. Código Civil para el estado de Tabasco. Disponible en: https: //congresotabasco.gob.mx/wp/wp-content/uploads/2019/02 /Codigo-Civil-para-el-Estado-de-Tabasco.pdf [fecha de consulta: 1 de junio de 2019].

8. Sadeghi MR. Surrogacy, an excellent opportunity for women with more threats. J Reprod Infertil. 2019; 20 (2): 63.

9. CNDH. Código Familiar del estado de Sinaloa. Disponible en: https://armonizacion.cndh.org.mx/Content/Files/DMVLV/LMF/SIN-CF.pdf [fecha de consulta: 01 de junio de 2019].

10. Söderström-Anttila V, Wennerholm UB, Loft A, Pingorb A, Aittomäki K, Romundstad LB et al. Surrogacy: outcomes for surrogate mothers, children and the resulting families- a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2016; 22 (2): 260-276.

11. Peters HE, Schats R, Verhoeven MO, Mijatovic V, De Groot CJM, Sandberg JL et al. Gestational surrogacy: results of 10 years of experience in the Netherlands. Reprod Biomed Online. 2018; 37 (6): 725-731.

12. Covington SN, Patrizio P. Gestational Carriers and Surrogacy. In: Sauver MV, ed. Principles of oocyte and embryo donation. Londres: Springer-Verlag. 2013: pp. 277-288.

13. Frankford DM, Bennington LK, Ryan JG. Womb outsourcing: commercial surrogacy in India. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2015; 40 (5): 284-290.

14. Bromfield NF, Smith K. Global surrogacy exploitation, human rights and international private law: a pragmatic stance and policy recommendations. Glob Soc Welf. 2014; 1 (3): 123-135.

15. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Recommendations for practices utilizing gestational carriers: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2017; 107 (2): e3-e10.

16. Ruiz-Robledillo N, Moya-Albiol L. Gestational surrogacy: psychosocial aspects. Psychosocial Intervention. 2016; 26 (3): 187-193.

17. Murugappan G, Farland LV, Missmer SA, Correia KF, Anchan RM, Ginsburg ES. Gestational carrier in assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril. 2018; 109 (3): 420-428.

18. Woo I, Hindoyan R, Landay M, Ho J, Ingles SA, McGinnis LK et al. Perinatal outcomes after natural conception versus in vitro fertilization (IVF) in gestational surrogates: a model to evaluate IVF treatment versus maternal effects. Fertil Steril. 2017; 108 (6): 993-998.

19. Baffone C. La maternidad subrogada: una confrontación entre Italia y México. Boletín Mexicano de Derecho Comparado. 2013; 137: 441-470.

20. Van Zyl L, Walker R. Surrogacy, compensation, and legal parentage: against the adoption model. J Bioeth Inq. 2015; 12 (2): 383-387.