medigraphic.com
ISSN 2992-8036 (Electronic)
ISSN 2306-4102 (Print)
Órgano Oficial del Colegio Mexicano de Ortopedia y Traumatología

2019, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Acta Ortop Mex 2019; 33 (3)

Biomechanics of the lumbar spine: a clinical approach

Lomelí‑Rivas A, Larrinúa‑Betancourt JE

Language: Spanish
References: 23
Page: 185-191
PDF size: 159.66 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The study of Biomechanics of the lumbar spine with clinical approach allows the physician related to locomotive sciences, to have a better interpretation of the clinical and radiological findings in order to carry out a treatment or a prediction of a medical problem with greater scientific foundation. The lumbar vertebral segment is studied from a biomechanical point of view in an integrated way, correlating with other body regions. The structures analyzed are the vertebrae, the intervertebral disks, the ligament and muscular system. The method of study goes from the static of the column to the dynamic, which includes the kinetic and kinematic aspects. The contradiction in the study of the lumbar spine is that the disorders of this body region are of the most frequent in the general and specialized medical consultation and, however, is not enough provided to the financial funds to carry out research.


REFERENCES

  1. Adams MA. Biomechanics of back pain. Acupunct Med. 2004; 22(4): 178-88.

  2. Newell N, Little JP, Christou A, Adams MA, Adam CJ, Masouros SD. Biomechanics of the human intervertebral disc: A review of testing techniques and results. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017; 69: 420-34.

  3. Miele VJ, Pandjabi MM, Benzel EC. Anatomy and biomechanics of the spinal column and cord. Hand Clin Neurol. 2012; 109: 31-43.

  4. Panjabi MM. A hypothesis of chronic back pain: ligament subfailure injuries lead to muscle control dysfunction. Eur Spine J. 2006; 15(5): 668-76.

  5. Jaumard NV, Welch WC, Wilkenstein BA. Spinal facet joint biomechanics and mechanotransduction in normal, injury and degenerative conditions. J Biomech Eng. 2011; 133(7): 071010.

  6. Cheng FD, Yang N, Jun CG, Yun PH, Chunqin Z. Biomechanical response of lumbar facet joints under followed preload: a finite element study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disord. 2016; 17: 126. doi: 10.1186/s 12891-016-0980-4.

  7. Chan SCW, Ferguson SJ, Gantenbein-Ritter B. The effects of dynamic loading on the intervertebral disc. Eur Spine J. 2011; 20(11) 1796-812.

  8. Setton LA, Chen J. Cell mechanics and mechanobiology in the intervertebral disc. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004; 29(3): 2710-23.

  9. Schellenberg F, Schmid N, Häberle R, Hörterer N, Taylor WR, Lorenzetti S. Loading conditions in the spine, hip and knee during different executions of back extension exercises. BMC Sport Sci Med Rehabil. 2017; 9: 10. doi: 10.1186/s13102-017-0074.0.

  10. Enoka RM. Dynamic analysis. In: Enoka RM. Neuromechanics of the human movement. 3rd ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, USA 2002.

  11. Nordin M, Frankel VH. Basic biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system. 3rd ed. Baltimore Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001.

  12. Nachemson A. Toward a better understanding of back pain: a review of the mechanics of the lumbar disc. Rheumatol Rehabil. 1975; 14(3): 129-43.

  13. Wilke HJ, Neef P, Caimi M, Hoogland T, Claes LE. New in vivo measurements of pressures in the intervertebral disc in daily life. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999; 24 (8): 755-62.

  14. Sato K, Kikuchi S, Yonezawa T. In vivo intradiscal pressure measurement in healthy individuals and in patients with ongoing back problems. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999; 24(23): 2468-74.

  15. Klein JA, Hickey DS, Huskins DW. Radial bulging of the annulus fibrosus and the function and failure of the intervertebral disc. J Biomech. 1983; 16(3): 211-7.

  16. Hansen L, de Zee M. Anatomy and biomechanics of the back muscles in the lumbar spine with reference to: biomechanical modeling. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006; 31(17): 1888-99.

  17. Narimani M, Arjmand N. Three-dimensional primary and coupled range of motions and movement coordination of the pelvis lumbar and thoracic spine in standing posture using inertial tracking device. J Biomech. 2018; 69: 169-74.

  18. Inoue M, Mizuno T, Sakakibara T, Kato T, Yoshikawa T, Inaba T, et ál. Trajectory of instantaneous axis of rotation in fixed lumbar spine with instrumentation. J Ortho Surg Res. 2017; 12(1): 177.

  19. Schmidt H, Heuer F, Claes L, Wilke HJ. The relation between the instantaneous center of rotation and facet joint forces: a finite element analysis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2008; 23(3): 270-8.

  20. Liu Z, Tsai TY, Wang S, Wu M, Zhong W, Li JS, Cha T, et ál. Sagittal plane rotation center of lower lumbar spine during a dynamic weight-lifting activity. J Biomech. 2016; 49(3): 371-5.

  21. Shin JH, Wang S, Yao Q, Wood KB, Li G. Investigation of coupled bending of the lumbar spine during dynamic axial rotation of the body. Eur Spine J. 2013; 22(12): 2671-7.

  22. Hartman RA, Yurube T, Ngo K, Merzlak NE, Debski RE, Brown BN, et ál. Biological responses to flexion/extension in spinal segments ex-vivo. J Orthop Res. 2015; 33(8): 1255-64.

  23. Iatridis JC, Kang J, Kandel R, Risbud MV. New horizons in spine research: disc biology, spine biomechanics and pathomechanisms of back pain. J Orthop Res. 2016; 34(8): 1287-8.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com