2018, Number 3
<< Back Next >>
Revista Cubana de Obstetricia y Ginecología 2018; 44 (3)
Gestation rate and βHCG levels in frozen and fresh embryos transfer
Ramos GRC, Rodríguez RN, Blanes ZR, Hess MS
Language: Spanish
References: 39
Page: 1-16
PDF size: 194.45 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: In the cycles of ovulation stimulation, the endometrium is subjected to
supra-physiological hormone levels that would lead to morphological and biochemical
alterations and to an endometrial environment responsible for implantation failure and
lower success rates, in addition to an asynchrony with respect to the embryos to
transfer. However, this does not happen in frozen embryos transfer (Frozen ET), in
which embryos are transferred in an environment that has not suffered deleterious
hormonal effects of IVF / ICSI cycles.
Objective: To evaluate if the results are superior in frozen ET cycles and if fresh
embryos transfer (TE) can replace the transfer of frozen embryos, and to establish the
effectiveness of vitrifying all embryos or "freeze all", as it is known, and transfer them
in a second time.
Methods: We compared the epidemiological parameters and the treatment of assisted
reproduction, implantation rates, gestation and βHCG levels in 168 patients of cycles of
frozen ET and 200 patients of ET cycles, carried out from January 2015 to November
2016. The statistical analysis was performed with the Student's t-test, Chi-square, and
ANOVA. (Statistical package SPSS, version 20.0).
Results: There were significant differences in β-HCG serum value that was higher for
frozen ET. The positive pregnancy rate was higher for frozen ET, with higher probability
of βHCG positive in relation to the TE group. The evolutionary clinical gestation rate did
not present significant differences.
Conclusions: Although we found a significant difference in βHCG values in frozen ET,
the clinical pregnancy rate and obstetric results did not turn out to be different.
REFERENCES
Trounson A, Mohr L. Human pregnancy following cryopreservation, thawing and transfer of an eight-cell embryo. Nature. 1983; 305:707-709.
Zeilmaker GH. Two pregnancies following transfer of intact frozen-thawed embryos. Fertil Steril. 1984; 42(2):293-296.
Saragusty J, Arav A. Current progress in oocyte and embryo cryopreservation by slow freezing and vitrification. Reproduction. 2011; 141:1-19.
Vajta G, Nagy ZP. Are programmable freezers stillneeded in the embryo laboratory? Review on vitrification. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006; 12:779-96.
Evans J, Hannan NJ, Edgell TA, Vollenhoven BJ, Lutjen PJ, Osianlis T, et al. Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer: backing clinical decisions with scientific and clinical evidence. Hum Reprod Update. 2014; 20(6):808-21.
Konc J, Kanyó K, Kriston R, Somoskyi B, Cseh S. Cryopreservation of Embryos and Oocytes in Human Assisted Reproduction Biomed Res Int [Internet]. 2014; 9 pag. Disponible en: doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/307268
Zhang L, Yan LI, Zhi X, Yan j, Qiao J. Female Fertility: Is it Safe to "Freeze?". Chin Med J. 2015; 128:390-397.
Simopoulou M, Asimakopoulos B, Bakas P, Boyadjiev N, Tzanakaki D, Oocyte and embrio vitrification in the IVF laboratory: A comprehensive review. Folia Med. 2014; 56(3):161-9.
Wong KM, Mastenbroek S. Cryopreservation of human embryos and its contribution to in vitro fertilization success rates. Fertil Steril.2014; 102(1):19-26.
Groenewoud ER, Macklon NS, Cohlen BJ. The effect of elevated progesterone levels before HCG triggering in modified natural cycle frozenthawed embryo transfer cycles [Internet]. Reprod Healthc. 2017; 34:546 - 554. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.02.008
Sabry D, Nouh O, Marzouk S, Hassouna A. Pilot study on molecular quantitation and sequencing of endometrial cytokines gene expression and their effect on the outcome of in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle. J Adv Res. 2014; 5: 595- 600.
Haouzi D, Bissonnette L, Gala A, Assou S, Entezami F, Perrochia H, Dechaud H, Hugues HJ, Hamamah S. Endometrial Receptivity Profile in Patients with Premature Progesterone Elevation on the Day of hCG Administration [Internet]. Biomed Res Int. 2. Volume 2014, Article ID 951937, 10 pag. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/951937
Herington JL, Guo Y, Reese J, Paria BC. Gene profiling the window of implantation: Microarray analyses from human and rodent models. J Reprod Health Med. 2016; 2(2): s19-s25.
Bellver J, Martínez-Conejero JA, Labarta E, Alamá P, Horcajadas JA. Endometrial gene expression in the window of implantation is altered in obese women especially in association with polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2011; 95(7): 2335-2341.
Basirat Z, Adib H, Esmailzadeh S, Gholam S, Jorsaraei A, Hajian- Tilaki K, Pasha H, Ghofrani F. Comparison of pregnancy rate between fresh embryo transfers and frozen-thawed embryo transfers following ICSI treatment. Int J Reprod BioMed. 2016; 14(1):39-46.
Roque M, Lattes K, Serra S, Sola I, Geber S, Carreras R, Checa MA. Fresh embryo transfer versus frozen embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2013; 99(1):156-162.
Henningsen AK, Pinborg A, Lidegaard, Vestergaard C, Forman JL, Andersen AN. Perinatal outcome of singleton siblings born after assisted reproductive technology and spontaneous conception: Danish national sibling-cohort study. Steril. 2011; 95: 959-963.
Shih W, Rushford DD, Bourne H, Garrett C, McBain JC, Healy DL, Baker HW. Factors affecting low birthweight after assisted reproduction technology: difference between transfer of fresh and cryopreserved embryos suggests an adverse effect of oocyte collection. Hum Reprod 2008; 23 (7):1644-1653.
Rodriguez-Purata J, Lee J, Whitehouse M, Duke M, Grunfeld L, Sandler1 B, Copperman A, Mukherjee T. Reproductive outcome is optimized by genomic embryo screening, vitrification, and subsequent transfer into a prepared synchronous endometrium. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016; 33:401-412.
Simon C, Vladimirov IK, Castillon Cortes G, Ortega, Cabanillas S, Vidal C, et aI. Prospective, randomized study of the endometrial receptivity analysis (ERA) test in the infertility wok-up to guide personalized embryo transfer versus fresh or deferred embryo transfer. ASRN. 2016.
Roque M, Valle M, Guimarães F, Sampaio M, Geber S. Cost-Effectiveness of the Freeze-All Policy. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2015;19(3):125-130.
Vidal M, Vellvé K, González Comadran M, Robles A, Prat M, Torné M, et al. Perinatal outcomes in children born after fresh or frozen embryo transfer: a Catalan cohort study based on 14,262 newborns. Fertil Steril. 2017: 107(4):940947.
Thijssen A, Creemers, A, Van der Elst, W, Creemers, A, Vandormael E, et al. Predictive value of different covariates influencing pregnancy rate following intrauterine insemination with homologous semen: a prospective cohort study. Reprod Biomed Soc [Internet]. 2017; 34(5):463-472. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.01.016
Cuadernos ASEBIR: Criterios ASEBIR de Valoración Morfológica de Oocitos, Embriones Tempranos y Blastocistos Humanos. 2015: 3º Edición. Disponible en: http://asebir.com/cuadernos-asebir/criterios-asebir-de-valoracion-morfologicade-oocitos-embriones-tempranos-y-blastocistos-humanos/
Bdolah Y, Zemet R, Aizenman E, Lossos F, Abram TB, Shufaro Y. FrozenThawed Embryo Transfer Success Rate is Affected by Age and Ovarian Response at Oocyte Aspiration Regardless of Blastomere Survival Rate [Internet]. JBRA Asistencia Reprod. 2015; 19 (4): 210-5. Disponible en: 10.5935 / 1518-0557.20150041.
Solé M, Santaló J, Rodríguez I, Boada M, Coroleu B, Barri PN, Veiga A. Correlation between embryological factors and pregnancy rate: development of an embryo score in a cryopreservation programme [Internet]. J Assist Reprod Genet (2011) 28:129-136. Disponible en: DOI 10.1007/s10815-010-9498-0
O'Shea LC, Hughes C, Kirkham C, Mocanu EV. The impact of blastomere survival rates on the competition of embryo development Cryo-Thawed Day 2 [Internet]. 2016 Feb, 197: 98-102. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26722995 .
Gade EJ, Thomsen SF, Lindenberg S, Backer V. Female Asthma Has a Negative Effect on Fertility: What Is the Connection? ISRN Allergy [Internet]. Volume 2014, Article ID 131092, 6 pag. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/131092
Quartim C. Melo MA, Reis S. Estilo de vida y ambiente. Remohí J. Manual práctico de Esterilidad y Reproducción Humana. 4º edición. Madrid. Editorial panamericana; 2012. 13-23.
García Velasco JA. Epidemiología de la esterilidad. máster en reproducción humana IVI [Internet]. 2012. 9 pag. Disponible en: www.equipoivi.es/cursos/masterurjc2013/formacion/docdow.php?id=3&ver=1
Boulet SL, Mehta A, Kissin DM, Trends in reproductive use and outcomes associated with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. JAMA. 2015; 313 (3): 255 - 263.
Xing W, Lin H, Li Y, Yang D, Wang W, Zhang Q. Is the GnRH Antagonist Protocol Effective in Prevention of OHSS for Potentially Elevated Responders Undergoing IVF / ICSI? [Internet]. PLoS Uno. 2015: 10 (10). Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4607293/
33.- Herrero, L., Martínez, M. y García-Velasco, JA Estado actual de ovocitos humanos y la criopreservación de embriones. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 23:245-250.
Aflatoonian A, Mansoori Moghaddam F, Mashayekhy M, Mohamadian F. Comparison of early pregnancy and neonatal outcomes after frozen and fresh embryo transfer in ART cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2010; 27: 695 - 700.
Ku PY, Lee RK, Lin SY, Lin MH, Hwu YM. Comparison of the clinical outcomes between fresh blastocyst and vitrified-thawed blastocyst transfer. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012; 29 (12): 1353 - 6.
Kurt T, Bamhart. Are we ready to eliminate the transfer of fresh embryos in vitro fertilization? Fertil Steril. 2014; 102(1):1-2.
Borges E, Alemida Ferreira DP, Setti AS, Vingris LS, Figueira RC, Laconelli A. Strategies for the manegent of OHSS: Results from freezing-all cycles. Assist Reprod. 2016; 20(1):08-12.
38.Gomaa H, Baydoun R, Sachak S, Lapana I, Soliman S. Elective single embryo transfer: Is frozen better than fresh? Assist Reprod. 2016; 20(1):03-07.
Lessey B. Endometrial receptivity and the window of implantation. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2000 :14(5):775-88.