Viniegra-Velázquez L

Language: Spanish
References: 18
Page: 155-166
PDF size: 129.96 Kb.

ABSTRACT

The reductionist empiricism (RE) underlying the current scientific habitus by imposing mechanistic causality (MC) as an explanatory principle of life sciences has obscured the understanding of the life process by equating it with that of a machine. The shapes ideas can take within knowledge are analyzed: as paradigms (anthropocentric and of disjunction, reduction and simplification), implicit logics of human ways of thinking and acting, and as comprehensive-explanatory theories. It is proposed that, by dismissing the ideas, the RE supplants the biological significance of what is observed by the statistical significance of the MC and the linear and probabilistic mathematics. It is argued that objectivity does not derive from experimental control, but from an interpretative framework pertinent to the type of events being studied and that the conviction that objectivity lies in the method of observation constitutes a myth of the RE that circumvents paradigms and its influence. Contextual causality is proposed and contrasted with the MC to highlight its limitations to explain the ungraspable biological complexity. The coincidence of the ongoing collapse of civilization and the apotheosis of reductionist science justifies dismissing it as mostly indifferent, ominous, impotent, accommodating or complicit with the dominance of profit interests without limits that degrade everything. It is concluded that it is time for resolutions: integrate with forces that aim, in various ways, to counteract this dominance and preserve our common habitat or to continue with the suicidal individualist complicity of “each their due and every man for himself.”

REFERENCES

1. Lichtenberg GC. Aforismos. México: FCE; 1995. p. 195.

2. Kuhn TS. La estructura de las revoluciones científicas. México: FCE; 1971.

3. Morin E. El pensamiento subyacente. En: El Método IV. Las ideas. Madrid: Cátedra;1998. p. 216-44.

4. Viniegra VL. El paradigma antropocéntrico. La educación y la crítica del conocimiento. México: Invipress-Hospital Infantil de México; 2015. p. 48‑50.

5. Viniegra-Velázquez L. El papel de las ideas en el conocimiento y las ciencias de la vida. Rev Invest Clin. 2014;66:181-93.

6. Viniegra VL. Acerca de la significación biológica. El pensamiento teórico y el conocimiento médico. México: UNAM; 1988. p. 51-92.

7. Piaget J. Adaptación vital y psicología de la inteligencia. México: Siglo XXI; 1978.

8. Margulis L. Symbiotic planet. A new look at evolution. New York: Basic books; 1998.

9. Margulis L, Sagan D. Captando genomas. Una teoría sobre el origen de las especies. Barcelona: Kairós; 2003.

10. Lovelock J. Gaia. Una nueva visión de la vida sobre la tierra. Madrid: Editorial Hermann Blume; 1983.

11. Lovelock J. Las edades de Gaia. Barcelona: Tusquets; 1993.

12. Lovelock J. La tierra se agota. El último aviso para salvar nuestro planeta. Barcelona: Planeta; 2011.

13. Canguilhem G. Máquina y organismo. El conocimiento de la vida. Barcelona: Anagrama; 1976. p. 15-43.

14. Maturana RH. Biología del fenómeno social. La realidad: ¿objetiva o construida? I. Fundamentos biológicos de la realidad. Barcelona: Anthropos; 1995. p. 3-18.

15. Viniegra-Velázquez L. El orden cultural, la enfermedad y el cuidado de la salud. Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex. 2017;74:397-406.

16. Viniegra-Velázquez L. La historia cultural de la enfermedad. Rev Invest Clin. 2008;60:527-44.

17. Viniegra-Velázquez L. ¿Deben ser las matemáticas el núcleo explicativo del conocimiento médico? Rev Invest Clin. 2001;53:93-103.

18. Bauman Z. Tiempos líquidos. Vivir en una época de incertidumbre. México: Tusquets editores; 2008. p. 154-5.