Occupational Epidemiology: Some Methodological Considerations

María Guadalupe Alvear-Galindo; María del Pilar Paz-Román

2006, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc 2006; 44 (3)

Occupational Epidemiology: Some Methodological Considerations

Alvear-Galindo MG, Paz-Román MP

Full text

How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 30
Page: 275-282
PDF size: 105.46 Kb.

ABSTRACT

During the last decade, occupational epidemiology has gained a great importance, not only because of the increase of pollutants and their noxiousness, but also because it has gone from the descriptive to the analytic level. The purpose of this work is to present what has been reported on epidemiological studies, different ways of characterizing and measuring occupational exposure, by emphasizing slants of exposure and selection measurement. In the reviewed studies, an interest in improving the exposure evaluation has been shown. The mainly reported measurement slants are the ways of measuring and classifying the exposure. The main designs were transversal with the use of matrixes to improve the evaluation of exposure. Conditions of hygiene and security were considered in order to control the quality of the information. This information was analyzed with different criteria. Some of the elements that hinder the research on occupational epidemiology are a mixed exposure, small populations, lack of exposure data, low levels of exposure and long periods of illness latency. Some breakthroughs in the strategies of epidemiological analysis and some other areas of knowledge have made possible a better understanding of work and health conditions of workers.

REFERENCES

1. Rothman K. Epidemiología moderna. Madrid, España: Díaz de Santos; 1987. p. 59-87, 365-390.
2. Flegal K, Keyl P, Nieto J. Differential misclassification arising from nondifferential errors in exposure measurement. Am J Epidemiol 1991; 134: 1233-1244.
3. Sven HI. En: Introduction to occupational epi-demiology. Lewis. USA; Publisher; 1992. p. 1-13.
4. Norell S. Diseño de estudios epidemiológicos. México: Siglo XXI; 1994. p. 18-33.
5. Checkoway H. Research methods in occupational epidemiology. Oxford University Press; 1989. p. 70-82.
6. Benke G, Sim M, Fritschi L, Aldred G. Beyond the job exposure matrix (JEM): the task exposure matrix (TEM). Ann Occup Hyg 2000;44(6):475-482.
7. Esmen NA, Hall TA, Stone RA, Marsh GM, Gula MJ, Gause CK. An investigation of secondary exposure misclassification effects of lifelong occupa-tional history in exposure estimation. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1999;60(2):175-181.
8. Williams PL, Frumkin H, Pierce ML, Manning CC, Elon L, Sanders AG. Reconstruction of occupational mercury exposures at a chloralkali plant. Occup Environ 2001;58(2):81-86.
9. Le Moual N, Bakke P, Orlowski E, Heederik D, Kromhout H, Kennedy SM, Rijcken B, Kauffmann F. Performance of population specific job exposure matrices (JEMs). European collaborative analyses on occupational risk factors for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with job exposure matrices (ECOJEM). Occup Environ Med 2000;57(2):126-132.
Heederik D, Attfield M. Characterization of dust exposure for the study of chronic occupational lung disease: a comparison of different exposure assessment strategies. Am J Epidemiol 2000;151(10): 982-990.
Rice C, Heineman EF. An asbestos job exposure matrix to characterize fiber type, length, and relative exposure intensity. Appl Occup Hyg 2003;18(7): 506-512.
Coughlin SS, Chiazze L Jr. Job-exposure matrices in epidemiologic research and medical surveillance. Occup Med 1990;5(3):633-646.
Kauppinen TP, Mutanen PO, Seitsamo JT. Mag-nitude of misclassification bias when using a job-exposure matrix. Scand J Work Environ Health 1992; 18(2):105-112.
Kauppinen T, Partanen T. Use of plant- and period-specific job-exposure matrices in studies on occupational cancer. Scand Work Environ Health 1988;14(3):161-167.
Bouyer J, Hemon D. Comparison of three methods of estimating odds ratios from a job exposure matrix in occupational case-control studies. Am J Epidemiol 1993;15;137(4):472-481.
Correa-Villaseñor A, Stewart WF, Franco-Marina F, Seacat H. Bias from nondifferential misclassification in case-control studies with three exposure levels. Epidemiology 1995;6(3):272-281.
Mannetje A, Fevotte J, Fletcher T, Brennan P, Legoza J, Szeremi M, Paldy A, Brzeznicki S, Gromiec J, Ruxanda Artenie C, Stanescu-Dumitru R, Ivanov N, Shterengorz R, Hettychova L, Krizanova D, Cassidy A, van Tongeren M, Boffetta P. Assessing exposure misclassification by expert assessment in multicenter occupational studies. Epidemiology 2003: 585-592.
Hauptmann M, Pohlabeln H, Lubirn JH, Jockel KH, Ahtens W, Bruske-Hohlfeld I, Wichmann HE. The exposure-time-response relationship between occupational asbestos exposure and lung cancer in two German case control studies. Am J Ind Med 2002;42(2):89-97.
Cordeiro R. Validity of occupational histories from proxy respondents. Rev Saude Publica 2000;34(5); 522-528.
Tielemans E, Heederik D, Burdorf A, Vermeulen R, Veulemans H, Kromhout H, Hartog K. Assessment of occupational exposures in a general population: comparison of different methods. Occup Environ 1999;23(4):145-151.
Lyon JL, Egger MJ, Robison LM, French TK, Gao R. Misclassification of exposure in a case-control study: the effects of different types of exposure and different proxy respondents in a study of pancreatic cancer. Epidemiology 1992;56(3):223-231.
Basso O, Olsen J, Bisanti L, Karmaus W. The per-formance of several indicators in detecting recall bias European Study Group on Infertility and Subfecundity. Epidemiology 1997;8(3):269-274.
Stewart PA, Zaebst D, Zey JN, Herrick R, Dosemeci M, Hornung R, Bloom T, Pottern L, Miller BA, Blair A. Exposure assessment for a study of workers exposed to acrylonitrile. Scand J Work Health 1998;24(Suppl 2):42-53.
Vetter R, Stewart PA, Dosemeci M, Blair A. Validity of exposure in one job as a surrogate for exposure in a cohort study. Am J Ind Med 1993;22(6):641-651.
Quinn MM, Smith TJ, Youk AO, Marsh GM, Stone RA, Buchanich JM, Gula MJ. Historical cohort study of US man-made vitreous fiber production workers: VII Exposure-specific job analysis. J Occup Med 2001;43(9):824-834.
Szklo M, Nieto J. Epidemiología intermedia. Con-ceptos y aplicaciones. España: Díaz de Santos; 2003. p. 107-151.
Rybicki BA, Peterson El, Johnson CC, Kortsha GX, Cleary WM, Gorell JM. Intra-and Inter.-rater agreement in the assessment of occupational exposure to metals. Int J Epidemiol 1998;27(2): 269-273.
Brener H. Correcting For exposure misclassification using an alloyed gold standard. Epidemiology 1996; 7(4):406-410.
Teschke K, Olshan AF, Daniels JL, De Roos AJ, Parks CG, Schulz M, Vaughan TL. Occupational exposure assessment in case-control studies: oppor-tunities for improvement. Occup Environ 2000; 59(9):575-593. Discussion 594.
Stewart PA, Lees PS, Francis M. Quantification of historical exposures in occupational cohort studies. Scad J Work Environ Health 1996;22(6): 405-414.