Villanueva-Bonilla C, Ríos-Gallardo ÁM

Language: English
References: 49
Page: 155-161
PDF size: 153.79 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Reading comprehension is the goal of all reading and constitutes one of the fundamental axes of cognitive development in early childhood. The learning problems are manifested essentially in the school environment and significantly hinder academic activities that include reading and writing processes. This review identifies and compares published research on intervention processes in children with learning difficulties, specifically addressing dyslexia and dysgraphia. We selected eight studies in Spanish at a Latin American level and 23 studies in English at a global level. In conclusion, the current state of empirical research published in Spanish in intervention processes in children with learning difficulties is fewer in number in the past 10 years compared to literature in English, as evidenced by the search. The comparison established with literature published in English and worldwide indicates progressive advances of the Latin American literature in the subject addressed by this review, specifically in intervention programs focused on specific difficulties associated with learning disorders.

REFERENCES

1. Bruner J. Desarrollo Cognitivo y Educación. Madrid: Morata; 1998.

2. Pinzás J. Metacognición y Lectura. Lima: Fondo Editorial PUCP; 2003.

3. Talero C, Espinosa A, Vélez A. Dificultad del aprendizaje de la lectura en las escuelas de una localidad de Bogotá. Acta Neurol Colomb. 2005; 21:280-8.

4. Ardila A, Rosselli M. Neuropsicología Clínica. México: Manual Moderno; 2007.

5. Matute E, Ardila M, Roselli A. Trastorno de la lectura. In: Roselli M, Matute y ME, Ardila A, editors. Neuropsicología del Desarrollo Infantil. México: Manual Moderno; 2010. p. 139-60.

6. Matute E, Roselli A, Ardila M. Trastorno de la expresión escrita. En: Roselli A, Matute y ME, Ardila A, editors. Neuropsicología del Desarrollo Infantil. México: Manual Moderno; 2010. p. 161-80.

7. Paris SG, Paris AH. Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educ Psychol. 2001;36:89-101.

8. Álvarez-Otero B, Monereo C. Evaluación del conocimiento estratégico de los alumnos a través de tareas auténticas de escritura en clase de ciencias naturales. Av Psicol Latinonot. 2010;28:251-64.

9. Lopera F. Dificultades del aprendizaje. In: Díaz R, Cornejo W, editors. Neurología Infantil. Medellín: Universidad de Antioquia; 2002. p. 224-42.

10. Rivas A. América Latina Después de PISA: lecciones Aprendidas de la Educación en Siete Países (2000-2015). Argentina: Fundación CIPPEC; 2015.

11. Aponte-Henao M, Zapata-Zabala ME. Caracterización de las funciones cognitivas de un grupo de estudiantes con trastornos específicos del aprendizaje en un colegio de la ciudad de Cali, Colombia. Psychologia. 2013;7:23-34.

12. Sattler J, Weyandt L. Discapacidades específicas para el aprendizaje. Evaluación infantil: aplicaciones Conductuales y Clínica. Vol. 2. México: El Manual Moderno; 2003. p. 293-349.

13. Pardo NA. Prevalencia del Trastorno Específico de la Lectura en una Muestra de Instituciones Educativas de la Localidad 19 de Bogotá. Colombia: Universidad Nacional de Colombia; 2015.

14. Defior S, Serrano F. Dislexia en español: bases para su tratamiento y diagnóstico. Dislexia definición e intervención en hispanohablantes. En: Matute E, Guajardo S, editors. Dislexia: definición e Intervención en Hispanohablantes. México: Manual Moderno; 2012. p. 15-35.

15. Artigas-Pallarés J. Dislexia: enfermedad, trastorno o algo distinto. Rev Neurol. 2009;48:63-9.

16. Portellano Pérez J. La Disgrafía. España: Editorial Paidós; 1985.

17. Dueñas M. Tengo un Hijo Disléxico. Madrid: Temas de Hoy; 1987.

18. Fabelo S, del Carmen M. Prevención de las disgrafías escolares: necesidad de la escuela actual para la atención a la diversidad: una mirada desde Cuba. Nóesis Rev Ci Soc Humanit. 2006;15:117-33.

19. Cadavid-Ruiz N, Rosas R, Quijano-Martínez MC, Tenorio M. El juego como vehículo para mejorar las habilidades de lectura en niños con dificultad lectora. Pensamiento Psicol. 2015;12:23-38.

20. Flórez-Romero R, Restrepo MA, Schwanenflugel P. Promoción del alfabetismo inicial y prevención de las dificultades en la lectura: una experiencia pedagógica en el aula de preescolar. Av Psicol Latinonot. 2009;27:79-96.

21. Córdova E. Intervención de la lectoescritura en una niña con dislexia. Pensamiento Psicol. 2014;12:55-69.

22. Vargas A, Villamil W. Diferencias en el rendimiento lector entre dos grupos de niños de transición debidas a una intervención promotora del alfabetismo emergente en el aula. Rev Colomb Psicol. 2007;16:65-76.

23. Castilla C, Amaya MY, Amaya YP, Laguna YV. Influencia del juego como pilar de la educación en el desarrollo del lenguaje oral y escrito por medio de los juegos de mesa. Rev Iberoam Psicol. 2014;7:39-48.

24. Duque-Aristizábal C. Exploración de la comprensión inferencial de textos narrativos en niños de preescolar. Rev Colomb Psicol. 2010;19:21-35.

25. Morales D, de Delia J, Mota MC, García EZ. La práctica social del lenguaje como base para la enseñanza de la lectoescritura. Rev Iberoam Psicol. 2012;5:59-66.

26. Valenzuela MJ, Ruiz IM, Ríos MD. Intervención temprana de la lectoescritura en sujetos con dificultades de aprendizaje. Rev Latinoam Psicol. 2011;43:35-44.

27. Grajo LC, Candler C. An occupation and participation approach to reading intervention (OPARI) Part II: pilot clinical application. J Occup Ther Sch Early Interv. 2016;9:86-98.

28. Grajo LC, Candler C. An occupation and participation approach to reading intervention (OPARI) Part I: defining reading as an occupation. J Occup Ther Sch Early Interv. 2016;9:74-85.

29. Baldi S, Nunzi M, Brina CD. Efficacy of a task-based training approach in the rehabilitation of three children with poor handwriting quality: a pilot study. Percept Mot Skills. 2015;120:323-35.

30. Tucci R, Savoia V, Bertolo L, Vio C, Tressoldi PE. Efficacy and efficiency outcomes of a training to ameliorate developmental dyslexia using the online software reading trainer®. BPA Appl Psychol Bull. 2015;64:53-60.

31. Qian Y, Bi HY. The effect of magnocellular-based visual-motor intervention on Chinese children with developmental dyslexia. Front Psychol. 2015;6:1-7.

32. Fusco N, Germano GD, Capellini SA. Efficacy of a perceptual and visual- motor skill intervention program for students with dyslexia. Codas. 2015;27:128-34.

33. Horowitz-Kraus T. Differential effect of cognitive training on executive functions and reading abilities in children with ADHD and in children with ADHD comorbid with reading difficulties. J Atten Disord. 2015;19:515-26.

34. Horowitz-Kraus T. Improvement in non-linguistic executive functions following reading acceleration training in children with reading difficulties: an ERP study. Trends Neurosci Educ. 2015;4:77-86.

35. Horowitz-Kraus T, DiFrancesco M, Kay B, Wang Y, Holland SK. Increased resting-state functional connectivity of visual and cognitive-control brain networks after training in children with reading difficulties. Neuroimage Clin. 2015;8:619-30.

36. Horowitz-Kraus T, Holland SK. Greater functional connectivity between reading and error-detection regions following training with the reading acceleration program in children with reading difficulties. Ann Dyslexia. 2015;65:1-23.

37. Moreau D, Waldie KE. Developmental learning disorders: from generic interventions to individualized remediation. Front Psychol. 2016;6:1-8.

38. Horowitz-Kraus T, Toro-Serey C, Difrancesco M. Increased resting-state functional connectivity in the cingulo-opercular cognitive-control network after intervention in children with reading difficulties. PLoS One. 2015;10:1-21.

39. Habib M, Lardy C, Desiles T, Commeiras C, Chobert J, Besson M, et al. Music and dyslexia: a New musical training method to improve reading and related disorders. Front Psychol. 2016;7:26.

40. Flaugnacco E, Lopez L, Terribili C, Montico M, Zoia S, Schön D, et al. Music training increases phonological awareness and reading skills in developmental dyslexia: a randomized control trial. PLoS One. 2015; 10:e0138715.

41. Jeffes B. Raising the reading skills of secondary-age students with severe and persistent reading difficulties: evaluation of the efficacy and implementation of a phonics-based intervention programme. Educ Psychol Pract. 2016;32:73-84.

42. Fraga-Gonzalez G, Zaric G, Tijms J, Bonte M, Blomert L, Leppanen P, et al. Responsivity to dyslexia training indexed by the N170 amplitude of the brain potential elicited by word reading. Brain Cogn. 2016;106:42-54.

43. McArthur G, Castles A, Kohnen S, Larsen L, Jones K, Anandakumar T, et al. Sight word and phonics training in children with dyslexia. J Learn Disabil. 2015;48:391-407.

44. McArthur G, Kohnen S, Jones K, Eve P, Banales E, Larsen L, et al. Replicability of sight word training and phonics training in poor readers: a randomised controlled trial. Peer J. 2015;2015:1-21.

45. Bonacina S, Cancer A, Lanzi PL, Lorusso ML, Antonietti A. Improving reading skills in students with dyslexia: the efficacy of a sublexical training with rhythmic background. Front Psychol 2015;6:1510.

46. Cancer A, Bonacina S, Lorusso ML, Lanzi PL, Antonietti A. Rhythmic reading training (RRT): a computer-assisted intervention program for dyslexia. In: Giakoumis D, Lopez G, Matic A, Serino S, Cipresso P, editors. 5th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Paradigms for Mental Health, Mind Care 2015. Tokyo, Japan: Springer Verlag; 2016. p. 249-58.

47. Wolff U. Effects of a randomized reading intervention study aimed at 9-year-olds: a 5-year follow-up. Dyslexia. 2016;22:85-100.

48. Heim S, Pape-Neumann J, van Ermingen-Marbach M, Brinkhaus M, Grande M. Shared vs. specific brain activation changes in dyslexia after training of phonology, attention, or reading. Brain Struct Funct. 2015; 220:2191-207.

49. Multhauf B, Buschmann A. Parent training programme for dyslexia recognising changes in children’s behaviour. LOGOS Interdiszip. 2016;24:4‑14.