2006, Number 2
<< Back Next >>
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc 2006; 44 (2)
Transoperative Tamponade due to Perforation with a Catheter for Central Blood Pressure: Report and Case Analysis
González-Arrieta ML, Grajales-y Marín N, Martínez-Huerta MA, Rendón-Arroyo ME, Rodríguez-Coria DF
Language: Spanish
References: 18
Page: 161-165
PDF size: 63.57 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Pericardial tamponade due to myocardial per-foration from central venous catheter is rather unusual, especially if it happens during a trans-operative period. When it comes up, it has a high mortality risk if the pericardial fluid is not drained at the proper time. At the Oncology Hospital of the National Medical Center, IMSS,
Mexico City (Hospital de Oncología del Centro Médico Nacional, Siglo XXI), at the Anesthesia Service, a case of tamponade in transoperative period came up, after a surgical procedure that lasted more than 6 hours, and that manifested itself with signs of cardiogenic shock that did not improve with treatment. The etiology was not diagnosed until a postmortem study. If it had been diagnosed on time, its clinical evolution would have been different with an opportune and correct treatment.
REFERENCES
1. Pine M, Holt K, Lou YB. Surgical mortality and type of anesthesia provider. AANA J 2003;71(2):109-116.
2. D’Erasmo EM, Bookless S, Howard JB. Adverse events with outpatient anesthesia in Massachusetts. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003;61(7):793-800.
3. Dimick JB, Cowan JA, Colletti Lisa M, Upchurch GR. Hospital teaching status and outcomes of complex surgical procedures in the United States. Arch Surg 2004;139:137-141.
4. Birkmeyer JD, Siewers A, Finlayson E, Stukel T, Lucas L, Batista I, et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 2002; 346(15):1128-1137.
5. Collier PE, Ryan JJ, Diamond DL. Cardiac tampo-nade from central venous catheters. Report of a case and review of the English literature. Angiology 1998;35:595-600.
6. Darling JC, Newell SJ, Dear PR. Placement of neonatal central venous catheter tips in the right atrium: a practice to be avoided? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Edition 2001;85(2):F146.
7. Ruesch S, Walder B, Tramer M. Complications of central venous catheters: internal jugular versus subclavian access. A systematic review. Crit Care Med 2002;30(2):454-460.
8. Booth SA, Norton B, Mulvey DA. Central venous catheterization and fatal cardiac tamponade. Br J Anaesth 2001;87:298-302.
9. Galloway S, Bodenham A. Long-term central venous access. Br J Anaesth 2004;92:722-734.
Rankine JJ, Thomas AN, Fluechter D. Diagnosis of pneumothorax in critically ill adults. Postgrad Med J 2000;76:399-404.
NavParkash SS. Transpectoral ultrasound-guided catheterization of the axillary vein: an alternative to standard catheterization of the subclavian vein. Anesth Analg 2004;99:183-187.
Slater J, Brown RJ, Antonelly TA, Menon Venu, Boland J. Cardiogenic shock due to cardiac free-wall rupture or tamponade after acute myocardial infarction: a report from the shock trial registry. JACC 2000;36(Suppl A):1117-1122.
Cserni G. Nodal staging of colorectal carcinomas and sentinel nodes. J Clin Pathol 2003;56:327-335.
Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-170-SSA1-1998. Dia-rio Oficial de la Federación, 14 de diciembre de 1998.
Gerry KC. Percutaneous interventional electro-physiology. BMJ 2003;327(7409):280-283.
Martínez-Huerta MA, González-Arrieta ML. Anes-tesia para mastectomía radical en un hospital onco-lógico. Rev Med IMSS 2003;41(2):127-131.
Ramus GV, Tonda L, Noussan P. Intrapericardial bleomycin in magement of malignant prericardical effusion and cardiac tamponade. Ann Oncol 2001; 12(Suppl 4):42.
Petr W, Pavel G. Pericardial involvement during the course of myocardial infarction: A long-term clinical and echocardiographic study. Chest 1995; 108(1):89-93.