Tulga A, Ayşe ŞF, Ömür DD

Language: English
References: 23
Page: 63-72
PDF size: 212.09 Kb.

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this preliminary study is to evaluate the push-out bond strength (PBS) of experimental dentin posts (EDPs) obtained from human and bovine teeth sterilized by autoclaving and gamma radiation. Eighty-four mandibulary premolars were obturated and divided into three post groups: the glass fiber group (Fb) human EDP group (Hm) and the bovine EDP group (Bv). Three subgroups (n=12) were obtained for each EDP groups according to the sterilization methods; no sterilization (Cnt), steam autoclaving (Aut), and gamma radiation (Rad) a total dose of 25 kGy. All posts were cemented to root canals using a dual cured resin cement (Panavia SA). After the micro slices (1mm in thickness) were obtained of each subgroup, PBS test was performed. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison tests (α=.05). The post type and sterilization method was significantly effective on the PBS values according to the ANOVA (P‹.001). No sterilization apllied EDP groups showed significantly higher PBS values than the sterilized groups (P‹.001). Bv_Cnt (9.42 ±1.31) showed significantly lower PBS values than both Fb (12.36 ±1.54) and Hm_Cnt (11.06 ±1.38) groups (P‹.001). Both steam autoclaving and gamma radiation affect the PBS values and fracture modes of EDPs negatively. The bovine EDPs are not as effective as human EDPs with regard to the PBS to the root dentin.

REFERENCES

1. Kathuria A., Kavitha M., Khetarpal S. Ex vivo fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors restored with fiberreinforced composite posts and experimental dentin posts. J Conserv Dent 2011; 14: 401-5.

2. Ambica K., Mahendran K., Talwar S., Verma M., Padmini G., Periasamy R. Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance under static and fatigue loading of endodontically treated teeth restored with carbon fiber posts, glass fiber posts, and an experimental dentin post system: an in vitro study. J Endod 2013;39: 96-100.

3. Diana H. H., Oliveira J. S., Ferro M. C. D. L., Silva-Sausa Y. T., Gomes E. A. Stress distribution in roots restored with fiber posts and an experimental dentin post: 3D-FEA. Braz Dent J 2016; 27: 223-227.

4. Swarupa C. H., Sajjan G. S., Bhupahupathiraju V. L., Anwarullahwarullah A., Sashikanth V. Y. Biological dentin post for intra radicular rehabilitation of a fractured anterior tooth. J Clin Diagn Res 2014; 8: 242-243.

5. Kumar B. S., Kumar S., Mohan Kumar N. S., Karunakaran J. V. Biological post. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2015; 7: 721-724.

6. Soares C. J., Rodrigues M. P., Faria-E-Silva A. L. et al. How biomechanics can affect the endodontic treated teeth and their restorative procedures? Braz Oral Res 2018;32: 169-183.

7. Sculean A., Windisch P., Chiantella G. C. Human histologic evaluation of an intrabony defect treated with enamel matrix derivative, xenograft, and GTR. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2004; 24: 326-333.

8. ArRejaie A., Al-Harbi F., Alagl A. S., Hassan K. S. Platelet-rich plasma gel combined with bovine-derived xenograft for the treatment of dehiscence around immediately placed conventionally loaded dental implants in humans: Cone beam computed tomography and three-dimensional image evaluation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2016; 31: 431-438.

9. Yassen G. H., Platt J. A., Hara A. T. Bovine teeth as substitute for human teeth in dental research: a review of literature. J Oral Sci 2011; 53: 273-272.

10. Tagami J., Tao L., Pashley D. H., Horner J. A. The permeability of dentine from bovine incisors in vitro. Arch Oral Biol 1989;34: 773-777.

11. Tate W. H., White R. R. Disinfection of human teeth for education purposes. J Dent Educ 1991; 55: 583-585.

12. Pantera E. A., Schuster GS. Sterilization of extracted human teeth. J Dent Educ 1990; 54: 283-285.

13. White J. M., Goodis H. E., Marshall S. J., Marshall G. W. Sterilization of teeth by gamma radiation. J Dent Res 1994; 73: 1560-1567.

14. Brauer D. S., Saeki K., Hilton J. F., Marshall G. W., Marshall S. J. Effect of sterilization by gamma radiation on nano-mechanical properties of teeth. Dent Mater 2008; 24: 1137-40.

15. Sano H., Ciucchi B., Matthews W. G., Pashley DH. Tensile properties of mineralized and demineralized human and bovine dentin. J Dent Res 1994; 73: 1205-1211.

16. Akkayan B., Gülmez T. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87: 431- 437.

17. Vastel L., Meunier A., Siney H., Sedel L., Courpied J. P. Effect of different sterilization processing methods on the mechanical properties of human cancellous bone allografts. Biomaterials 2004; 25: 2105-2110.

18. Zicari F., De Munck J., Scotti R., Naert I., Van Meerbeek B. Factors affecting the cement-post interface. Dent Mater 2012; 28: 287- 297.

19. Galhano G., Melo R. M., Valandro L. F., Bottino M. A. Comparison of resin push-out strength to root dentin of bovine- and humanteeth. Indian Dent Res 2009; 20: 332- 336.

20. Schilke R., Lisson J. A., Bauss O., Geurtsen W. Comparison of the number and diameter of dentinal tubules in human and bovine dentine by scanning electron microscopic investigation. Arch Oral Biol 2000; 45: 355- 361.

21. Jiang R., Xu Y., Lin H. Effects of two disinfection/sterilization methods for dentin specimens on dentin permeability. Clin Oral Investig 2019; 23: 899-904.

22. Sperandio M., Souza J. B., Oliveria D. T. Effect of gamma radiation on dentin bond strength and morphology. Braz Dent J 2001; 12: 205-208.

23. Cheung D. T., Perelman N., Tong D., Nimni M. E. The effect of gamma-irradiation on collagen molecules, isolated alpha-chains and crosslinked native forces. J Biomed Mater Res 1990; 24: 581- 589.