2019, Number 2
<< Back Next >>
Odovtos-Int J Dent Sc 2019; 21 (2)
Fluoride Release of Giomer and Resin Based Fissure Sealants
Şişmanoğlu S
Language: English
References: 34
Page: 45-52
PDF size: 166.53 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Fissure sealants are applied to teeth to prevent caries development. The presence of the fissure
sealant creates a protective barrier, which prevents plaque accumulation to the pits and fissure. They
have a significant role in preventing pit and fissure caries. The aim of this study was to evaluate the
time-dependent fluoride ion release of giomer- and resin-based fissure sealants. Fissure sealants were
divided into 4 groups: BeautiSealant (Shofu, Japan), Clinpro Sealant (3M ESPE, USA), Helioseal F (Ivoclar
Vivadent, Liechtenstein), Fissurit F (Voco, Germany). Disk shaped samples were prepared for each sealant
material tested, and they were transferred into polyethylene vials containing 5 ml of deionized water.
Fluoride ion diffusion was determined on days 1,2,3,7,14,21, and 28 (n=7). The fluoride concentration in
these samples was analyzed using a pre-calibrated spectrophotometer in parts per million (ppm). These
experiments were performed in triplicates at room temperature. ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD test were used
for statistical analysis. BeautiSealant was released the highest amount of fluoride on day 1 (5.33 ppm),
followed by a sudden decrease on the day 2 (2.17ppm). The burst effect was observed only in this group.
Clinpro Sealant, Fissurit F and HelioSeal F groups presented fluoride release of 2.69, 2.94 and 2.91 ppm
on the first day, respectively, without a significant difference (p›0.05). After the first week, a constant
fluoride release level has been reached. The fluoride release for the three resin-based fissure sealants
was slightly lower than that for the giomer-based. After the first week, materials exhibited no significant
difference and reached a plateau. The usage of a high and prolonged fluoride-releasing fissure sealant
material should be considered by clinicians, particularly in patients with caries risk.
REFERENCES
Mejŕre I., Lingström P., Petersson L. G., Holm A., Twetman S., Källestĺl C., et al. Caries preventive effect of fissure sealants: a systematic review. Acta Odontol Scand. 2003; 61 (6): 321-30.
Ahovuo-Saloranta A., Hiiri A., Nordblad A., Mäkelä M., Worthington H. V. Pit and fissure sealants for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth of children and adolescents. In: Ahovuo-Saloranta A, editor. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2008. p. CD001830.
Simonsen R. J. Pit and fissure sealant: review of the literature. Pediatr Dent. 2002; 24 (5): 393-414.
Krämer N., Schmidt M., Lücker S., Domann E., Frankenberger R. Glass ionomer cement inhibits secondary caries in an in vitro biofilm model. Clin Oral Investig. 2018; 22 (2): 1019-31.
Kuşgöz A., Tüzüner T., Ulker M., Kemer B., Saray O. Conversion degree, microhardness, microleakage and fluoride release of different fissure sealants. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2010; 3 (8): 594-9.
A. Alsaffar, D. Tantbirojn, A. Versluis, S. Beiraghi. Protective effect of pit and fissure sealants on demineralization of adjacent enamel. Pediatr Dent. 2011; 33 (7): 491-5.
Campus G., Carta G., Cagetti M. G., Bossů M., Sale S., Cocco F., et al. Fluoride concentration from dental sealants. J Dent Res. 2013; 92 (7): S23-8.
Ulusu T., Odabaş M. E., Tüzüner T., Baygin O., Sillelioğlu H., Deveci C., et al. The success rates of a glass ionomer cement and a resin-based fissure sealant placed by fifthyear undergraduate dental students. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2012; 13 (2): 94-7.
Azarpazhooh A., Main P. A. Pit and fissure sealants in the prevention of dental caries in children and adolescents: a systematic review. J Can Dent Assoc. 2008; 74 (2): 171-7.
Kavaloglu Cildir S., Sandalli N. Compressive strength, surface roughness, fluoride release and recharge of four new fluoride-releasing fissure sealants. Dent Mater J. 2007; 26 (3): 335-41.
Poulsen S., Laurberg L., Vaeth M., Jensen U., Haubek D. A field trial of resin-based and glass-ionomer fissure sealants: clinical and radiographic assessment of caries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2006; 34 (1): 36-40.
Muller-Bolla M., Lupi-Pégurier L., Tardieu C., Velly A. M., Antomarchi C. Retention of resin-based pit and fissure sealants: A systematic review. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2006; 34 (5): 321-36.
Petersson G. H., Bratthall D. The caries decline: a review of reviews. Eur J Oral Sci. 1996; 104 (4): 436-43.
Bahadure R., Pandey R., Kumar R., Gopal K., Singh R. An estimation of fluoride release from various dental restorative materials at different pH: In vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2012; 30 (2): 122.
Naoum Ellakwa F. Martin M. Swain S. A., Naoum S., Dip G., Ellakwa A., Elizabeth Martin F., Swain M. Fluoride release, recharge and mechanical property stability of various fluoride-containing resin composites. 2011; 36 (4): 422-32.
Dionysopoulos D., Koliniotou-Koumpia E., Helvatzoglou-Antoniades M., Kotsanos N. Fluoride release and recharge abilities of contemporary fluoride-containing restorative materials and dental adhesives. Dent Mater J. 2013; 32 (2): 296-304.
Mousavinasab S. M., Meyers I. Fluoride release by glass ionomer cements, compomer and giomer. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2009; 6 (2): 75-81.
Bayrak G. D., Sandalli N., Selvi-Kuvvetli S., Topcuoglu N., Kulekci G. Effect of two different polishing systems on fluoride release, surface roughness and bacterial adhesion of newly developed restorative materials. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2017; 29 (6): 424-34.
Garcia-Godoy F., Abarzua I., De Goes M. F., Chan D. C. Fluoride release from fissure sealants. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1997; 22 (1): 45-9.
Helvatjoglu-Antoniades M., Karantakis P., Papadogiannis Y., Kapetanios H. Fluoride release from restorative materials and a luting cement. J Prosthet Dent. 2001; 86 (2): 156-64.
de Araujo F. B., García-Godoy F., Cury J. A., Conceiçăo E. N. Fluoride release from fluoride-containing materials. Oper Dent. 1996; 21 (5): 185-90.
Yamazaki H., Litman A., Margolis H. C. Effect of fluoride on artificial caries lesion progression and repair in human enamel: Regulation of mineral deposition and dissolution under in vivo-like conditions. Arch Oral Biol. 2007; 52 (2): 110-20.
Hellwig E., Lennon Á. M. Systemic versus topical fluoride. Caries Res. 2004; 38 (3): 258-62.
Karantakis P., Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M., Theodoridou-Pahini S., Papadogiannis Y. Fluoride release from three glass ionomers, a compomer, and a composite resin in water, artificial saliva, and lactic acid. Oper Dent. 2000; 25 (1): 20-5.
Preston A. J., Mair L. H., Agalamanyi E. A., Higham S. M. Fluoride release from aesthetic dental materials. J Oral Rehabil. 1999; 26 (2): 123-9.
Lee S. Y., Dong D. R., Huang H. M., Shih Y. H. Fluoride ion diffusion from a glassionomer cement. J Oral Rehabil. 2000; 27 (7): 576-86.
Neelakantan P., John S., Anand S., Sureshbabu N., Subbarao C. Fluoride release from a new glass-ionomer cement. Oper Dent. 2011; 36 (1): 80-5.
Strother J. M., Kohn D. H., Dennison J. B., Clarkson B. H. Fluoride release and re-uptake in direct tooth colored restorative materials. Dent Mater. 1998; 14 (2): 129-36.
Eliades G., Kakaboura A., Palaghias G. Acid-base reaction and fluoride release profiles in visible light-cured polyacid-modified composite restoratives (compomers). Dent Mater. 1998; 14 (1): 57-63.
Hicks M. J., Flaitz C. M., Garcia-Godoy F. Fluoride-releasing sealant and caries-like enamel lesion formation in vitro. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2000; 24 (3): 215-9.
Jensen M. E., Wefel J. S., Triolo P. T., Hammesfahr P. D. Effects of a fluoridereleasing fissure sealant on artificial enamel caries. Am J Dent. 1990; 3 (2): 75-8.
Eichmiller F. C., Marjenhoff W. A. Fluoridereleasing dental restorative materials. Oper Dent. 1998; 23 (5): 218-28.
Paschoal M. A. B., Gurgel C. V., Rios D., Magalhăes A. C., Buzalaf M. A. R., Machado M. A. de A. M. Fluoride release profile of a nanofilled resin-modified glass ionomer cement. Braz Dent J. 2011; 22 (4): 275-9.
Salmerón-Valdés E. N., Scougall-Vilchis R. J., Alanis-Tavira J., Morales-Luckie R. A. Comparative study of fluoride released and recharged from conventional pit and fissure sealants versus surface prereacted glass ionomer technology. J Conserv Dent. 2016; 19 (1): 41-5.